Don't be an idiot.
If you call for ceasefire that's a call for all parties to stop fighting.
Then investigate and charge all who committed war crimes and/or terrorism.
Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
If you call for ceasefire that's a call for all parties to stop fighting.
Then investigate and charge all who committed war crimes and/or terrorism.
Generally no.
This would be a first time but these crimes are as bad as you can get.
Last edited:
Out of 8 billion? LOL.
Like I've said before, you're clearly a fringe element.
Regardless, I was talking about TERB. You have a well-deserved bad reputation for being a hateful person. And it's because of the views you espouse that, as even you said, the world hates. That's how you're widely viewed here.
Do you think that Gaza's or Hamas' situation will improve once this current conflict is done with?
Or will the Oct. 7 attack result in another setback for your side? A stupidly repetitious and avoidable setback.
Please enlighten us with your instincts and political savvy. Most likely your answer will just be more questions. You seem incapable of giving a straight answer.
Lol, Terbs clown and village idiot opens his yap again. No it’s not. Else the protest, post such as yours would seek to put as much pressure on Iran, Hamas PIJ etc
Ok, idiot.
how do you propose to ensure the ceasefire last more than a “few days” this time. And if/when it doesn’t what will you do. Other than whine more about Israel and expect them to rollover.
Maybe. I think Nazi Germany would dissagree, as would many others…
How will you ensure they keep the peace, and what will you do when they don’t? And is there anything you can point at, that suggest there’s hope for it to begin with?
Israels loss of status continues to unfold.You are part of a tiny, angry, racist group.
Can you name a time in history when the strategy you're proposing Israel employs has been successful? I can't. In fact, every time I can think of this strategy being used, it's only made things worse.
Besides, you're basically proposing the same strategy Israel has been employing for decades: hitting back harder and harder. Israel has proven that for every Israeli citizen killed by Hamas, they will kill multitudes of Palestinians. Yet Hamas' power hasn't waned. As I said above, Israel's strategy of hit harder than we get hit has made Hamas stronger and increased support for them amongst Palestinians.
Is there a reason you think if they keep hitting harder and harder it will eventually work when that has not had the desired effect up until now? And unless you can name when this worked in history, is there any reason why you think this strategy will work for Israel when it's never worked for anyone else?
Except they won't accept a 2 state solution. Ever.
This is only going to end with a winner.
At its face value, you are correct. However, it is a fair counterpoint to the many Palestinians who claim to have the right to the land based on ancient history.
It's the same argument but coming from the other side.
Where is the proper starting point in time? I don't think it's been established.
The correct solution is not to stop until there is unconditional surrender. Ceasefires don't work, negotiated settlements don't work. Just delay things. The animosity festers and grows.
Pretty much the Sri Lankin example is the one needed here imo.
Israeli decided to escalate and bomb Lebanon deeper than before. Hezbollah responded in kind and hit an Israeli city, Kiryat Shimona
The vast majority of people here are denigrating YOU and your views.
You are on the fringes.
You don’t know that peace has lasted?
“you don’t know”
Nor do you. But what does history tell you. As I said, you can’t point to anything that suggest yet another peace agreement will last. Do you have anything, anything at all. Thats suggest this time it will and Hamas, any other terrorist group in the area, or state will abide by it.
And what do you propose Israel do if history repeats itself.
Last edited:
How about 1948 when the U.N. decided the borders? That sounds like the most fair date.
Israel acquired those borders by negotiated world consensus. No violence/force was involved.
Every single time.
If their strategy would not have worked, they'd have been driven into the sea with each Arab attack.
The Israelis are not dinks.
A better question would be, when has the Palestinian strategy been successful? Which aggression furthered their cause?
