Again - instead of deflecting with idiotic photos that prove absolutely nothing (except in your simple mind) - what proof do you have that Putin is in any way, shape or form afraid of Trump and would not have started the war if Trump was President in 2020?
Trump/Zelensky deal turns into Jerry Springer episode
- Thread starter nottyboi
- Start date
Perhaps this is in the form of argument that mitch might appreciate.
We forget, but this was all public knowledge.
from 2018
foreignpolicy.com
from 2018
How Russian Money Helped Save Trump’s Business
After his financial disasters two decades ago, no U.S. bank would touch him. Then foreign money began flowing in.
foreignpolicy.com
Interesting.
I didn't think you would go all in on "no peace deal is worth the paper it is printed on" given you constantly saying they need to make a peace deal with Putin, but here you are.
Please don't let our idiotic PM use this event as the opportunity to
give another billion to Zelensky.
That's kind of a normal swing in midterms especially with a slim House majority.
The U.S. has been due for a slowdown/recession. If that pushes out into late 2026, it would certainly hurt the Republicans.
Quick side note.
Why do you call it "The Ukraine"?
Just noticed you seem to do that all the time.
The feeling is mutual. I guess you can hide behind the British on this point.
It seems that Saagar is a good friend of Vance's, so he's basically just scrambling to cover his friend's ass.
He should care. He'll still be in office after mid-term elections.
Just wait. When Canada becomes the 51st state, Mitch will be appointed governor by Trump.
Why wouldn't it apply, Earp?
Finns, Latvians and Swedes seem pretty fucking convinced it applies. Guess they're not as smart as you then?
It's pretty obvious regardless of political perspective who is merely aping talking points and who has distinctive viewpoints.
That might be true, but I'm not sure that is certain. Nor is it certain Ukrainians will support further conscription. Both sides seem to have manpower issues.
Sounds like you and others want to roll the dice on furthering a war of attrition. It's a valid opinion.
People have noticed that he's just trying to bail out his friend.
That said, it is pretty obvious that the Administration thinks that utilateralism (they aren't isolationists) does appeal to their fanbase.
They think they came off well here, portraying what they wanted to portray.
