Asia Studios Massage

Trump administration accidentally texts reporter war plans

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,181
10,024
113
As did the Biden admin. It has been established that this is the standard procedure they were trained on to use.

Damn right they were stupid. My question is, if they have the tech, and you need to show proof if an actual dedicated system in place, why not use it.

So what is this system you claim they have, and didn't the previous admin use it?

My answer is, they don't.
That system records their coms so they used signal to avoid potential disclosure
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
35,007
66,873
113

Yup.
So... nothing supporting your position.

Unless your position is "other people used Signal, too"?
That would be silly, though, since it would mean you think "someone in the government ever used signal" is the important issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,340
5,395
113

Yup.
So... nothing supporting your position.

Unless your position is "other people used Signal, too"?
That would be silly, though, since it would mean you think "someone in the government ever used signal" is the important issue.
That was my point. That the previous administration authorized its use. And the only reason, at the end of the term, to suddenly issue a warning would be because they found people using it wrongly. To cover their own asses. It's amazing how you can't read between the lines.

You are Obtuse again and failing to come up with something. Just arguing for arguing sake. You take everything at face value when it comes from a Democrat.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Valcazar

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,461
17,607
113
That was my point. That the previous administration authorized its use. And the only reason, at the end of the term, to suddenly issue a warning would be because they found people using it wrongly. To cover their own asses. It's amazing how you can't read between the lines.

You are Obtuse again and failing to come up with something. Just arguing for arguing sake. You take everything at face value when it comes from a Democrat.
Authorizing Signal to use is one thing; I DON'T SEE ANYWHERE the Biden administration claiming to use Signal for military operations being okay, DO YOU? Do you have any proof besides your BUtt facts that any admin besides this current bumbling one that Signal was ever used for military purposes?? I can answer this one for you, NO YOU DON'T! Stop making assumptions and declaring your silly assumptions to be fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,340
5,395
113
Authorizing Signal to use is one thing; I DON'T SEE ANYWHERE the Biden administration claiming to use Signal for military operations being okay, DO YOU? Do you have any proof besides your BUtt facts that any admin besides this current bumbling one that Signal was ever used for military purposes?? I can answer this one for you, NO YOU DON'T! Stop making assumptions and declaring your silly assumptions to be fact.
I never said they did. What was claimed and refuted was the Biden administration never authorized its use PERIOD.

And considering how they hid his cognitive decline, arguably one of the largest national security breaches in US history, thinking their sudden warning, at the end of the term, was to CYA conversations that should not have happened on Signal, is entirely appropriate.

It would be quite plausble they used it and the conversation deletion mode to discuss his senility as an example. No doubt Ukraine and Israeli war conversation occured as well.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,461
17,607
113
I never said they did. What was claimed and refuted was the Biden administration never authorized its use PERIOD.

And considering how they hid his cognitive decline, arguably one of the largest national security breaches in US history, thinking their sudden warning, at the end of the term, was to CYA conversations that should not have happened on Signal, is entirely appropriate.

It would be quite plausble they used it and the conversation deletion mode to discuss his senility as an example. No doubt Ukraine and Israeli war conversation occured as well.
If I was given a dollar for every time you assume and try to pass it on as fact, I'd have Elon Mush FU money.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,340
5,395
113
If I was given a dollar for every time you assume and try to pass it on as fact, I'd have Elon Mush FU money.
If I had one for everytime you were naive about the Democrats I'd be the sole owner of the stock exchange.

How is Schumer doing? Did you like his support of Trump's budget resolution?
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,461
17,607
113
If I had one for everytime you were naive about the Democrats I'd be the sole owner of the stock exchange.

How is Schumer doing? Did you like his support of Trump's budget resolution?
The Dems really have no control levers since the electorate in the US are dimwits. This will change in less than 2 years.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,470
100,173
113
If I had one for everytime you were naive about the Democrats I'd be the sole owner of the stock exchange.

How is Schumer doing? Did you like his support of Trump's budget resolution?
I do. Leftie Dems tried to make headway in overthrowing Schumer for the vote. But Rachel Bitecofer - among others - pointed out that the WH rules unchecked on an emergency basis while Congress is vacated and most Dems supported Schumer for that reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kherg007

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,340
5,395
113
The Dems really have no control levers since the electorate in the US are dimwits. This will change in less than 2 years.
He voted with the GOP. Have you not seen this?



He can't even go out in public. Half of his own party want to oust him.

The Democrats could have said no unless you guarantee no funding cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Instead they went with what Wall St wanted.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,461
17,607
113
He voted with the GOP. Have you not seen this?



He can't even go out in public. Half of his own party want to oust him.

The Democrats could have said no unless you guarantee no funding cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Instead they went with what Wall St wanted.
He doesn't want the government shut down while they wait to regain power. IS that not putting American's first, unlike the POS in the whitehouse who was crying like a little bitch that congress didn't shut it down during the Biden administration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,340
5,395
113
He doesn't want the government shut down while they wait to regain power. IS that not putting American's first, unlike the POS in the whitehouse who was crying like a little bitch that congress didn't shut it down during the Biden administration.
It's capitulating again. Allowing them to destroy the social safety net. Because they are controlled opposition who received as much money from the oligarchs. They will stand by and do nothing. And reverse nothing as well.

It's going to get worse. The GOP are going to destroy the poor and middle class and the Democratic Party will stand by and watch. They are useless to the people.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,461
17,607
113
It's capitulating again. Allowing them to destroy the social safety net. Because they are controlled opposition who received as much money from the oligarchs. They will stand by and do nothing. And reverse nothing as well.

It's going to get worse. The GOP are going to destroy the poor and middle class and the Democratic Party will stand by and watch. They are useless to the people.
Ah I see, you are already angling your arguments of nonsense and bullshit to prepare for the downfall of the American economy all due to one man and the cowardly republicans who will not stand up for themselves but you, you are preparing to also blame the Dems who do not control the house, the senate or the Whitehouse yet you want to place blame at their feet. You are so obnoxious with your narrative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,340
5,395
113
Ah I see, you are already angling your arguments of nonsense and bullshit to prepare for the downfall of the American economy all due to one man and the cowardly republicans who will not stand up for themselves but you, you are preparing to also blame the Dems who do not control the house, the senate or the Whitehouse yet you want to place blame at their feet. You are so obnoxious with your narrative.
Lol. Who lost the election because of their candidates again?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts