You have no evidence of it though.Lol. I understand humans. That warning was put out BECAUSE THEY WERE USING IT FOR TRANSMISSION OF CLASSIFIED INFO. They wouldn't have felt the need to otherwise.
That's the way humans work. And they tend to ignore warnings too.
Considering how they lied about Biden's cognitive decline, which was a far greater national security problem, forgive my skeptical thinking.You have no evidence of it though.
The most likely explanation is that they looked at Signal, and said okay that's great convenient tech for staff to tell their spouse they will be late for dinner, but reminded everyone to use the proper tech for sensitive data within the government. Ie SCIF's and so on.
If anyone did ignore it, they would be brought in line by someone who knows better and face consequences. Unfortunately the group on that Signal chat are idiots and none of them knew better.
Why do you make assumptions without any proof? Even now after seeing what a POS the Trumputin administration is, your natural inclination is to shit on the democrats with assumptions and But facts pulled out of your ass.It's not an allegation. Why put a warning in 2023 if they HADN'T USED IT THAT WAY?
Is case you didn't read, I have said it's inexcusable. Watz should be fired and arguably charged. One of the group members was in Moscow at the time and could easily have been hacked. It's actually larger than him.Why do you make assumptions without any proof? Even now after seeing what a POS the Trumputin administration is, your natural inclination is to shit on the democrats with assumptions and But facts pulled out of your ass.
So it’s the both-sides-ism thing?Is case you didn't read, I have said it's inexcusable. Watz should be fired and arguably charged. One of the group members was in Moscow at the time and could easily have been hacked. It's actually larger than him.
My point is it's a continuance of the hubris of top level officials that they are above the law. If a notice was put out not to use it it clearly means it was used in this way before.
It doesn't in any way excuse them. It merely points out my continuing point that both parties need a house cleaning. No one gets a break.
If you don't want me to point this out, don't extole the virtues of the Democratic Party where none exist.
It's the, both sides need to go thing. Both leaderships are bought and paid for, incompetent and corrupt.So it’s the both-sides-ism thing?
The law never applies to the right wing according to butler.So it’s the both-sides-ism thing?
You are using something that was created in your mind to once again fit your silly Dem-bashing agenda.If you don't want me to point this out, don't extole the virtues of the Democratic Party where none exist.
Lol. How is Schumer doing lately?You are using something that was created in your mind to once again fit your silly Dem-bashing agenda.
You know what happens next.As did the Biden admin. It has been established that this is the standard procedure they were trained on to use.
Wait.Damn right they were stupid. My question is, if they have the tech, and you need to show proof if an actual dedicated system in place, why not use it.
So what is this system you claim they have, and didn't the previous admin use it?
My answer is, they don't.
And your proof of this " Signal became a go to App" is based on what?Apparently they don't. That's the point. Signal became a go to App.
That people used Signal at any time isn't proof it was what was used for classified communication.Think about it. If there was a dedicated cabinet lvl system, that is the one they would use. But Signal was used by the previous admin as well. And we have no idea what they transmitted either on it.
So this is now "everyone in the previous administration was using Signal to avoid presidential record requirements" ?It's just they at least were smart enough not to include reporters. Or the reporters never reported if they were.
Email was in use before this administration. Paper notepads and whiteboards were in use before this administration. Doesn't mean they can use them inappropriately for sensitive data.
You are reaching conclusions about the approved uses of Signal without evidence. To me, that document warns them on how to properly use Signal and avoid less secure alternatives if they really are using a messenger app.
There is no way that they don't have other policies that restrict what channels or storage they approve for different levels of information classification.
That is InfoSec 101, familiar in any org dealing with confidential data. That is where the DOD memo comes in and says channels like Signal are not approved for non-public information.
And your proof of this " Signal became a go to App" is based on what?
(Or are you just talking about the Trump admin?)
That people used Signal at any time isn't proof it was what was used for classified communication.
So this is now "everyone in the previous administration was using Signal to avoid presidential record requirements" ?