WASHINGTON −
The Atlantic magazine on Wednesday published the full text chain from
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and other top
Trump officials detailing operations to carry out U.S. military airstrikes in a Signal chat group with a reporter present after the White House denied "war plans" had been shared.
Among other details, Hegseth disclosed the timing of planned airstrikes by U.S. attack jets and armed drones on militant Houthi targets in Yemen on March 15, according to an account by The Atlantic's editor-in-chief,
Jeffrey Goldberg. Goldberg was inadvertantly added to a group chat, called "Houthi PC Small Group," where
President Donald Trump's top national security officials discussed hitting Iran-backed Houthi sites.
The report includes screen shots of the group texts, which detail drone targets, sequencing of the attacks and the type of weaponry used.
Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.
Goldberg and fellow Atlantic reporter Shane Harris said the magazine had previously withheld publicizing Hegseth's texts out of concern for the sensitive nature of the information. Goldberg had been mistakenly invited to the chat by Trump's national security adviser,
Mike Waltz, and was observing the group's conversations, unbeknownst to the 18 Trump officials in the chat.
But after Trump officials insisted Tuesday that no classified material was shared in the chat ‒ and downplayed the gravity of the breach ‒ the magazine's journalists said they decided to disclose the messages to let people "reach their own conclusions."
According to a story
published by Goldberg on Wednesday morning, Hegseth at 11:44 a.m. on March 15 ‒ about 30 minutes before the first airstrikes ‒ sent an update to the group that read: "TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is FAVORABLE. Just CONFIRMED w/CENTCOM we are a GO for mission launch.”
More: Trump admin scrambles to defend group text leak as investigations begin: recap
Hegseth then detailed the timeline for the airstrikes in texts:
- “1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)”
- “1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)”
More: Timeline shows how journalist was inadvertently added to secret military group chat
Hegseth later wrote:
- “1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)”
- “1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets)”
- “1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched.”
- “MORE TO FOLLOW (per timeline)”
- “We are currently clean on OPSEC”—that is, operational security.
- “Godspeed to our Warriors.”
White House still argues no 'war plans' were discussed
Trump's White House on Tuesday continued to dispute the initial Atlantic report about "war plans" being discussed in the chat, noting that The Atlantic's headline describes the information as "attack plans," not war plans like Monday's initial story.
"The Atlantic has conceded: these were NOT 'war plans,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. "This entire story was another hoax written by a Trump-hater who is well-known for his sensationalist spin."
USA TODAY
Get unlimited digital access to USA TODAY and premium Sports+ storiesOne month free
Get it now
Waltz,
in a statement on the release of the messages, said: "No locations. No sources & methods. NO WAR PLANS. Foreign partners had already been notified that strikes were imminent. BOTTOM LINE: President Trump is protecting America and our interests."
More: But her e-mails? Here is how Trump's team reacted to a Hillary Clinton security breach
Shorty after Hegseth's initial updates the day of the attack, according to The Atlantic,
Vice President JD Vance texted the group, “I will say a prayer for victory.”
Waltz then provided updates on real-time conditions of the target sites, according to The Atlantic.
“VP. Building collapsed. Had multiple positive ID. Pete, Kurilla, the IC, amazing job," Waltz wrote, referring to Hegseth; General Michael E. Kurilla, the commander of Central Command; and the intelligence community, or IC.
Waltz later texted: "Typing too fast. The first target – their top missile guy – we had positive ID of him walking into his girlfriend’s building and it’s now collapsed.”
Waltz, Vance and CIA Director John Ratcliffe each took turns in the chat applauding the success of the operations.
(L-R) National Security Agency Director General Timothy Haugh, Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe and Defense Intelligence Agency Director Jeffrey Kruse prepare to testify during an annual worldwide threats assessment hearing at the Longworth House Office Building on March 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. The hearing held by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence addressed top aides inadvertently including Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief for The Atlantic magazine, on a high level Trump administration Signal group chat discussing plans to bomb Houthi targets in Yemen.© Kayla Bartkowski, Getty Images
Hegseth alerted group chat of more Yemen attacks to come
Later, Hegseth wrote: “CENTCOM was/is on point," before telling the group more strikes would be coming. “Great job all. More strikes ongoing for hours tonight, and will provide full initial report tomorrow. But on time, on target, and good readouts so far.”
Trump and his administration have scrambled to minimize the fallout after the Signal chat fiasco by downplaying the gravity of the breach, touting the success of the military operation and lashing out at the reporter.
Yet Goldberg's account raised new questions about why Trump's national security team would use
a commercial phone app to discuss sensitive plans to conduct airstrikes on Iran-backed Houthi sites in Yemen.
It also exposed what appears to be recklessness for Waltz to inadvertently invite a journalist into a chat group that included top administration officials including Vance, Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others.
More: 'It's embarrassing': Trump national security adviser Waltz takes responsibility for war plan leak
Reporter shares screengrab showing Waltz's invitation to chat
Waltz told Fox News on Tuesday he took “full responsibility" for the reporter's presence in the Signal chat of Trump administration officials. "I take full responsibility. I built the group," Waltz said on "The Ingraham Angle." "It's embarrassing. We're going to get to the bottom of it."
Yet Waltz told reporters he’s never met Goldberg and will investigate "how the heck" he got into the Signal chat group ‒ even though Goldberg has said he was invited by Waltz.
Among the screenshots published in Wednesday's Atlantic story is one detailing Goldberg's initial introduction to the Signal chat. It reads: "Mike Waltz added you to the group."
Trump on Tuesday attacked Goldberg as a "total sleazebag," argued no classified information was shared in the Signal chat and defended Walz, saying he has no reason to apologize. “It’s just something that can happen," Trump said of the breach. "You can even prepare for it, and it can happen.”