what forum is that?
thx
r/sugarlifestyleforum
r/sugarlifestyleforum: A forum where SDs and SBs discuss the sugar lifestyle, share experiences, and learn from one another
what forum is that?
thx
thank your/sugarlifestyleforum
r/sugarlifestyleforum: A forum where SDs and SBs discuss the sugar lifestyle, share experiences, and learn from one anotherwww.reddit.com
They’re called salt daddiesafter quickly reading through 50 page + of conversation it sounds like most of the guys here just want the best bang for the buck. The term sugar daddy and sugar baby has really changed throughout the years.
If you meet a woman off seeking and the first meet is in a hotel room then you found an escort who uses seeking lolI came across this thread a week or so ago. I was intrigued mainly by the fact seeing a SB would feel less transactional, so I gave it a go. I'm tall, not devilishly handsome but not bad looking either, and I have a decent career, so I've been getting tons of DMs from the ladies. I will say that I'm weeding out most, and am only interacting with a small handful that are coming across more genuine.
I ended up meeting a girl last week at a hotel, and I was quite happy with the experience.
I tried to meet up with another one, but dodged a bullet when she asked me to etransfer her before buzzing me up to her apartment.
Then if a woman is meeting a man off seeking and the first meet is in a hotel room she found a John who uses seeking?If you meet a woman off seeking and the first meet is in a hotel room then you found an escort who uses seeking lol
This is common knowledge among all veterans. Go do some research on our Reddit Sugar related sub. 99.9% of the time in this scenario she's an escort, ESPECIALLY in cities where it's legal, aka TorontoThat’s not the case all the time. SBs know that SD’s priority is having sex. If SD allows good allowances and has no place to host, then SB is agreed to be hosted in a hotel. They know that they will be asked for sex at the end. It doesn’t matter they do sex at the first meeting or later as long as they are agreed on arrangement.
Yes, that's the common view among the sugar community. Go check out sugarlifestyleforum on Reddit.Then if a woman is meeting a man off seeking and the first meet is in a hotel room she found a John who uses seeking?
I have spent enough time on that subreddit before they banned me for life and now I can only read lol so I am quite aware of it.This is common knowledge among all veterans. Go do some research on our Reddit Sugar related sub. 99.9% of the time in this scenario she's an escort, ESPECIALLY in cities where it's legal, aka Toronto
A lot of SBs and SDs would take an issue with that. They like to talk a big game abut how this would be beneath them...until the money would have to change hands lolGuys sugaring is just glorified prostitution let be real here
Why would you offer 1,000 to someone you've never met. Especially if you're experienced.You can consider this is an escorting but I met many girls in this situation in the past. They are not escort but they are willing to do sex at the first meeting. If you provide good amount of money(1k +) and offer them to host in 5 star hotel and they like you, there are girls who are willing to do that, at least in the past. Because you are potentially wealthy man and this is an opportunity for them, they dont wanna miss.
So if you take a prostitute our for dinner and a movie and then sex it would be the same price as a one hour booking?I agree with you. In fact, this is just prostitution. I believe all SBs are aware of it. They just manipulate themselves to believe this is a dating with a rich guy. They need money , they know SDs want sex, they try to find an excuse to do this.
Preaching to the choir with me, I'm just stating what it's like and how the discussions go in some of the biggest forums regarding that lifestyle. And, what you described is sugar to most people five years ago. Still, all information available to the women draws the line that this is escorting and real sugar-based relationships involve "some" outside dates.You can consider this is an escorting but I met many girls in this situation in the past. They are not escort but they are willing to do sex at the first meeting. If you provide good amount of money(1k +) and offer them to host in 5 star hotel and they like you, there are girls who are willing to do that, at least in the past. Because you are potentially wealthy man and this is an opportunity for them, they dont wanna miss.
it’s like putting lipstick on a pig. Still a pig. So it’s still an escort no matter how much some want to ‘sugar’ coat It.You can consider this is an escorting but I met many girls in this situation in the past. They are not escort but they are willing to do sex at the first meeting. If you provide good amount of money(1k +) and offer them to host in 5 star hotel and they like you, there are girls who are willing to do that, at least in the past. Because you are potentially wealthy man and this is an opportunity for them, they dont wanna miss.
Don’t fool yourself lol she’s just a pay per meet prostitute.So if you take a prostitute our for dinner and a movie and then sex it would be the same price as a one hour booking?
My SBs have been "pay per meet" not "pay per hour" the way a prostitute does.
I'd say you are not wrong if you are assessing her morals, but PPM prostitutes don't really exist in western countries.Don’t fool yourself lol she’s just a pay per meet prostitute.
My point was that if you are paying then she’s a prostitute.I'd say you are not wrong if you are assessing her morals, but PPM prostitutes don't really exist in western countries.
again, I don't entirely disagree, but we are going into semantics now. And there are shades of grey. What if she is a "kept woman" who has had just one or a maybe couple of daddies for the last 5 years?My point was that if you are paying then she’s a prostitute.
Absolutely but let’s not forget it’s all about giving out the money at the end of it. I had an arrangement about 15 years ago with a rather sweet lady. What I thought was a connection was really a relationship depending on what I could offer financially. So the way I sum it up is, at the end of the day it’s just about the money. If I never provided I had to accept she never would have been ‘interested’. You live and learn.again, I don't entirely disagree, but we are going into semantics now. And there are shades of grey. What if she is a "kept woman" who has had just one or a maybe couple of daddies for the last 5 years?
Bottom line is: labels are less important than substance. And the substance is: what is the most enjoyable way to get our dicks wet? Everyone decides for themselves






