Frightened mouseI'm sure you'll be laughing all the way to the Hague.
What this line of debate says is that you know Israel is apartheid, is going to the courts of it but think that the US can hold everyone off forever.
Frightened mouseI'm sure you'll be laughing all the way to the Hague.
What this line of debate says is that you know Israel is apartheid, is going to the courts of it but think that the US can hold everyone off forever.
Yes, the one Hamas refused to extend. Hamas even fire rockets before that ceasefire had ended.You mean when Israel agreed to a ceasefire and 105 hostages were released?
...
Yet the UN said Israel has accepted. Netanyahu is talking for an internal political audience but had already authorized the negotiators to make that ceasefire deal.Its Israel that is opposed to a ceasefire.
...
Hamas and previous Palestinian leaderships have rejected any peace involving Jews for 100 years. When are you going to accept they are responsible for much of the ramifications?Israel chose to be apartheid and now must deal with the ramifications.
End of story.
Deal with it Shazi.
Irgun were terrorists and opposed by mainstream zionist groups and when Israel was formed, Irgun was forcibly disarmed by the state....
Irgun were terrorists before there were Palestinian terrorists.
...
Clearly, the intent is to influence world opinion and hence influence the conflict. You cannot deny that.And what will those protests accomplish? Nothing. They will effect no change in policy.
And that's what people do when they donate to AIPAC. It's good that you endorse their donations to support Israel. It's all perfectly kosher.If you want to fight and die for Israel, you're welcome to. If you want to donate all your wealth to Israel, you're welcome to.
Same goes for any other foreign country. I don't.
Actually, it's a huge piece of turf. It is historical proof showing how the UN works when there is actual apartheid. No such workings, meaning resolutions like #1761, have been passed against Israel. Deal with it.You keep holding on to that tiny bit of turf,
The problem in the past has been the man turning us against one another. We have been unable to see the truth, because we have fighting for ten square feet of ground, our turf, our little piece of turf. That's crap, brothers! The turf is ours by right, because it's our turn. All we have to do is keep up the general truce. We take over one borough at a time. Secure our territory... secure our turf... because it's all our turf!Actually, it's a huge piece of turf.
That is conjecture, Genostradamus.I'm sure you'll be laughing all the way to the Hague.
He alwaaayys diverts when he's losing a debate. The only exception is when he chooses to just lie outright.The problem in the past has been the man turning us against one another. We have been unable to see the truth, because we have fighting for ten square feet of ground, our turf, our little piece of turf. That's crap, brothers! The turf is ours by right, because it's our turn. All we have to do is keep up the general truce. We take over one borough at a time. Secure our territory... secure our turf... because it's all our turf!
Can you dig it suckas
Now watch Frankie desperately try to turn this about Trump or about some pro Hamas thing or to paint me a homophobe [ironic isn't that] or some other utterly clueless nonsense.
Netanyahu was the one that declared that truce would end when they said it would and wouldn't be extended.Yes, the one Hamas refused to extend. Hamas even fire rockets before that ceasefire had ended.
You've spent 9 months demanding a ceasefire while also saying Hamas shouldn't accept any of the ceasefires.
Its Netanyahu that refuses to end the war, even if the hostages were returned.Yet the UN said Israel has accepted. Netanyahu is talking for an internal political audience but had already authorized the negotiators to make that ceasefire deal.
Too bad Hamas refused once again, sending a whole new set of demands instead.
There were no peace offers, basketcase.Hamas and previous Palestinian leaderships have rejected any peace involving Jews for 100 years. When are you going to accept they are responsible for much of the ramifications?
Irgun became part of the Israeli government.Irgun were terrorists and opposed by mainstream zionist groups and when Israel was formed, Irgun was forcibly disarmed by the state.
But Irgun was formed in in 1931, after the anti-Jewish riots in 1919, 1920, and 1929.
Shazi, can we take it from your posts that if the UN ever issues a resolution declaring Israel apartheid you will agree with them and cease supporting Israel?Actually, it's a huge piece of turf. It is historical proof showing how the UN works when there is actual apartheid. No such workings, meaning resolutions like #1761, have been passed against Israel. Deal with it.
As hard as you try, you cannot lie or divert your way around documented history. Based on your history, you'll probably try to tell us #1761 never really happened.
Not yet, Shazi.That is conjecture, Genostradamus.
What is not conjecture is that no resolution of apartheid have been levied against Israel.
So if anyone takes your home they can declare its theirs by right, because its their turn?That's crap, brothers! The turf is ours by right, because it's our turn.
Like I said, conjecture. As for now, nothing concrete.Not yet, Shazi.
So we can tale it from your posts, with the multitude of "evidence" you have contributed to this point and what you claim the ICC and ICJ have already had for months, if the UN passes no resolution in the next 4-6 weeks you will admit that Israel is not an apartheid state.Shazi, can we take it from your posts that if the UN ever issues a resolution declaring Israel apartheid you will agree with them and cease supporting Israel?
Will you agree to this?