Did the chief suggest any other way to eliminate hamas?
Did the chief suggest any other way to eliminate hamas?
you can pretend to be outraged all you like but the truth is that this was always part of the Hamas game plan.
Read whose mind? Gallant? I am not reading his mind, but I am saying there is doubt as to what he, and by extension Israel is doing in Gaza.
I agree your statement was not unequivocal, however, for the reasons I pointed out, the fact you suspect he was referring to Palestinians when it so very clear he was referring only to Hamas, I stand by what I said in my post.We are fighting human animals" - not sure who he was referring to exactly - Hamas or the civilians there, but given my observation of Israeli attitudes towards the Palestinians in general, I am leaning towards interpreting this as collective punishment.
did I misread the last paragraph of your post?Where is my statement claiming that? You're asking me to defend a statement I never made. That's called a strawman.
I said the attacks on Japan weren't purely punitive or they would be illegal. I didn't say Israel's attacks were. However, I only got involved in a thread responding to someone who implied they were, which is why I have considered relevant to bring up.
Its quite clear that the leader of the IDF was referring to the people of Gaza, not just Hamas.It is clear that he is referring to the "human animals" who carried out the atrocities of Oct. 7. That was a brutal and atrocious Hamas attack and Israel has explicitly said that they are going after and fighting Hamas. I find it hard to even consider that he was referring to the civilians but the fact that you are actually inclined to believe "human animals" meant the civilians, shows that you have a very strong bias against Israel.
Probably the same thing they thought in 2008, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2021 and 2022.Maybe I am missing it but I would love to see the Hamas leader sit down for a press conference and explain what was going on in their tiny minds when they decided to enact October 7th?
What did they think they would achieve?
Have they achieved it?
What did they think would happen?
Did it happen?
Did they really think it through and consider the possibility of the outcome?
When they launched a raid into Israel, did they prepare by making sure the hospitals food and water supplies would be ok?
Shine on you crazy Diamond....
Explain please.
Accepted. Thanks for hearing me out.It isn't clear to me, given Israeli attitudes. It could have just been rhetoric, or just a bad choice of words, but was something more tacit being said? Its possible. But then again, may be not. We'd have to wait and see.
Mandela was listed as a terrorist.Did the chief suggest any other way to eliminate hamas?
The videos are posted.And that includes how could he be so stupid as to call Palestinians animals in a public statement? He was repeating the official policy of the Israeli government which is to eradicate the sub-human animals of Hamas, who committed sub-human atrocities. It's unfathomable to think otherwise, except under certain circumstances.
There is zero doubt as to what he meant.
“So” lots of people here with experience or expertise in different areas. How often do you listen to people with that in finance or economics?DM, genuinely has military experience. If you read his posts, you'd know this.
Watch the videos and hear what he says.So basically you are purporting to have the ability to read his mind based on your small sample size. What percentage of Israelis have that view? Any polls to reference or just your admittedly anecdotal evidence?
Even if he did mean the civilians, who had nothing to do with the attack and committed no sub-human atrocities so why should he mean them, do you think that he'd be stupid enough to call the civilians that in a public statement? Seriously?
I don't doubt that many Israelis have a bias against Palestinians, but to assume that bias is extreme enough to be calling them sub-human animals (I forget the exact wording) exists among the vast majority of Israelis such that you can readily assume the minister was referring to Palestinians and not simply Hamas (the perpetrators that the IDF says that they're going after) in itself is further example of an anti-Israeli bias.
Without scientific polling to back up your point about most Israelis considering Palestinians animals, then, as I said, you are claiming to have the ability to read minds because he most certainly did not say Palestinians. The Israeli government's (in who's capacity he is speaking for) official policy is going after and eliminating HAMAS. Not Palestinians. It is nothing more than conjecture on your part.
I don't think your misread it, but maybe you missed the context of it. Or perhaps I wasn't clear about the context. But I'm happy to clarify.did I misread the last paragraph of your post?
What was Hamas thinking? For over three decades, it has had the same brutal idea of victory | AP NewsProbably the same thing they thought in 2008, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2021 and 2022.
That they were resisting the illegal occupation and illegal blockade.
CBC posted a quote from Hamas in the first few days saying that this time they were responding to a massive increase in settler terrorist attacks, more land theft and the storming of the Al Aqsa, which is pretty much what they responded to in 2021.
Israel has not held peace talks in a decade.
Its a 75 year old occupation.
That's the problem.
Especially when you project your hateful and spiteful way of thinking onto someone else.Its quite clear that the leader of the IDF was referring to the people of Gaza, not just Hamas.
Israel started off by cutting off all water, food and power to Gaza.I don't think your misread it, but maybe you missed the context of it. Or perhaps I wasn't clear about the context. But I'm happy to clarify.
That paragraph references the sections above it. Someone else has claimed that Israel was justified in purely punitive attacks. I didn't say their attacks were purely punitive, I merely said they weren't justified in carrying out purely punitive attacks. It was a response to someone else's comments, not a condemnation of my own.
I've called them war crimes, and I believe they are. I think it's possible they violate the non-reciprocity portion of the laws of armed conflict (meaning I think it's possible they are purely punitive), but I'm not sure. I am certain enough to satisfy myself, however, that the Israeli attacks would not meet the threshold of a proportional proportionality analysis to be justified and for that reason I call them war crimes. But whether they are purely punitive or whether Israel simply doesn't care about the Palestinian civilians I can't say. The ICC is looking into that and in generally I believe the ICC does an excellent job in investigations and manages to remain unbiased, so I'll happily accept whatever timing they reach if they declare the attacks didn't violate non-reciprocity.
They were air-detonated so I don't think flatness would have had any bearing on it. I've never heard that myself, but if you have a source I'd love to read it. This is a summary of all the major points that went into the decision as far as I believe:As far as I recall one of the main factors considered in case of Hiroshima and nagasaki was that the ground was flat there which would help the wave of destruction to go further
Why wouldn't you ask the same of Israel?
I knew you would go on the attack once the videos were posted.Especially when you project your hateful and spiteful way of thinking onto someone else.
It is a pleasure to discuss the topic with someone rational and willing to listen to someone else's point of view (kautilya) instead of gaslighting, twisting words and accusing others every single time of supporting genocide and apartheid for daring to see things differently than you.
I thanked kautilya for what I considered a mutually respectful, yet potentially delicate debate.
Instead you continue to prove my point that you instigate more nasty, dishonest and accusatory discussions than anybody else BY FAR.
YOU ARE A DETRIMENT TO TERB.