Sexy Friends Toronto

Israel at war

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,408
1,702
113
What's the bullshit here?
Holding me accountable for someone else's opinion, including the UNs, is bullshit.

If there are no condemnation of Hamas...
That's my point: I've condemned Hamas at every point. I've called for their execution for war crimes.

this conflict is historical and look at it on the view on what were committed in between....a terrorist act and retribution...those 2 aren't alike...you can make your own assumption...what you have is an opinion....
It's not opinion or assumption to say that if the attacks against Gaza are retribution they are war crimes. First Hague Convention, Second Treaty, 29 July 1899: Laws and Customs of War on Land, Article 50. Fourth Geneva Convention, 12 August 1949: Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Article 33. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions, Protocol II, 8 June 1977: relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts, Article 6.

There is no part of The Hague or Geneva Conventions, or any other law of armed conflict, that absolves an armed force for committing a war crime of its own if it's own done in response to a war crime by someone else. The parties that structured these treaties operated on the assumption that they were dealing with adults and that the "But he started it!" argument used by toddlers and children would not be considered.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
16,556
8,049
113
Holding me accountable for someone else's opinion, including the UNs, is bullshit.
That's my point: I've condemned Hamas at every point. I've called for their execution for war crimes.
It's not opinion or assumption to say that if the attacks against Gaza are retribution they are war crimes. First Hague Convention, Second Treaty, 29 July 1899: Laws and Customs of War on Land, Article 50. Fourth Geneva Convention, 12 August 1949: Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Article 33. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions, Protocol II, 8 June 1977: relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts, Article 6.

There is no part of The Hague or Geneva Conventions, or any other law of armed conflict, that absolves an armed force for committing a war crime of its own if it's own done in response to a war crime by someone else. The parties that structured these treaties operated on the assumption that they were dealing with adults and that the "But he started it!" argument used by toddlers and children would not be considered.
You call for Hamas execution...by who? Sounds like an empty promise....
Israel are not fighting adults only...
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,935
11,812
113
Toronto
I was calling it a war crime, because Yoav Gallant, while announcing this said - "We are fighting human animals" - not sure who he was referring to exactly - Hamas or the civilians there,
It is clear that he is referring to the "human animals" who carried out the atrocities of Oct. 7. That was a brutal and atrocious Hamas attack and Israel has explicitly said that they are going after and fighting Hamas. I find it hard to even consider that he was referring to the civilians but the fact that you are actually inclined to believe "human animals" meant the civilians, shows that you have a very strong bias against Israel.
 

kyleb899

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2011
1,324
658
113
lost the respect of rebel news , it a free Palentine protests
the people want a cesefire and stop genocide .
is Rebel news with the mainstream media now , i remember back in the covid lockdowns , they were all agiaist the lockdowns and vaccine mandates
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,357
10,375
113
As I said, probably blown up by Israeli bombs. It’s happened to 8000 other people.
8000 people according to hamas ministry of health?
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
16,556
8,049
113
But that is why I mentioned Israeli attitudes as personally observed behaviours within my own friends circle. There is enormous racism within Israel towards the Palestinians, and Israel itself is objectively, a racist and apartheid state, which is undeniable, even if some of those measures were instituted as security measures.

I also posted several videos on another thread called the "Ask Project". Give it a watch. Those are street interviews by Corey Gil-Shuster, who is Canadian-Israeli, and teaches in Israel, in the area of Conflict Management. It gives you an idea of racism within Israel. Now the Palestinians are no slouches either. However, prevailing Israeli attitudes, combined with observed behaviours within my own friends circle, and videos of regular people I have watched online, definitely creates doubt on what Yoav Gallant was referring to. So it isn't as "clear" as you think it is, which is why there is an investigation that is ongoing.

The only correct position in this conflict is to be pro-Israel, pro-Palestine and anti-Hamas.

But we also have to acknowledge the oppression of the Palestinians, the stealing of their lands etc., which Israel is 100% guilty of.

Mine therefore, is a neutral position, not a biased one.
There was no stolen lands....The land where Israel is sitting now was half of what it used to be....the other half as Jordan...Palestinians (arabs) as well as the Jews and arabs in Israel have co-existsed long before the British Mandate...with the conflicts erupting from time to time....Notice how there are no historical Palestinian earlier than 1800s? So for them to claim they are the rightful inhabitants of Palestine is quite audacious...rejecting the 2-state also shows you where their minds are towards the Jews...."there can never be any other options to the problems of palestinians other than cleansing the land of jews...how many jews in iraq? Iran? Syria? Egypt? Lebanon? I would call it "racism" towards palestinian...it's acknowledging how much the other side hates you but at least they're not denying it....
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts