Holding me accountable for someone else's opinion, including the UNs, is bullshit.What's the bullshit here?
That's my point: I've condemned Hamas at every point. I've called for their execution for war crimes.If there are no condemnation of Hamas...
It's not opinion or assumption to say that if the attacks against Gaza are retribution they are war crimes. First Hague Convention, Second Treaty, 29 July 1899: Laws and Customs of War on Land, Article 50. Fourth Geneva Convention, 12 August 1949: Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Article 33. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions, Protocol II, 8 June 1977: relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts, Article 6.this conflict is historical and look at it on the view on what were committed in between....a terrorist act and retribution...those 2 aren't alike...you can make your own assumption...what you have is an opinion....
There is no part of The Hague or Geneva Conventions, or any other law of armed conflict, that absolves an armed force for committing a war crime of its own if it's own done in response to a war crime by someone else. The parties that structured these treaties operated on the assumption that they were dealing with adults and that the "But he started it!" argument used by toddlers and children would not be considered.