I'm sure that the fact that pre-67, the West Bank was Jordanian and in their peace treaty they gave Israel authority over the West Bank doesn't enter your calculations.
You were specifically saying that you were sure the leader of the Israeli military wasn't talking about the people of Gaza when he used the term 'human animal', even though you clearly hadn't checked.
You are lying again.
Which means there can be no two state solution that you would ever agree to.
They have. In one the said that they were willing to sacrifice Palestinian people to meet their goals (though I have no idea how they thought attacking 1400 civilians would help them) In another they claimed that they were only going after military targets then stormed out when the host challenged them on it.
Your claims are moronic and motivate3d simply by an obsessive hatred of Jews living in the middle East. There is no 'back' because Palestinians haven't ever ruled the land to begin with. A Palestinian state should be created but that won't happen as long as people like you and Hamas think violence will create peace.
So you only want to talk about one side of a conflict? Sorry but racism from both sides is part of what prevents peace so trying to blame only one side is useless.
And attacks on Jews driving in the West Bank has been a daily event for decades. Of course you don't want to talk about Palestinains perpetuating the conflict.
I'm not anti-LGBT, I am only anti certain parts of the LBGT movementBut you always post anti-LGBTQ stuff on other threads.
Mandela was NEVER listed as aterrorist by Canada.
No contradiction unless you have an alternate version of history. The region is currently rule by Israel. before that it was Jordan, the Brits, the Ottomans, Abbasids, Ayyubid , Crusaders, Byzantines, Romans, .... Except for very brief periods between empires, the last independent Kingdom in the region was Judea.
You can say this about the videos Hamas posted of their training and from the Oct 7 attack but you still pretend they don't exist.
Once again Frank pretends attacks targeting civilians are an appropriate response to political disagreements.
We know exactly what Israel has been thinking. Every time they move towards peace, they are subjected to violence from groups openly dedicated to the elimination of Israel's Jewish presence.
That tends to happen in response to another state declaring war by slaughtering a bunch of civilians. This is the only conflict in history where people think the people being attacked are responsible for feeding their attackers people.
Hate has a home everywhere.
Some of the Settlements were Jewish towns established in the 1920s until the were ethnically cleansed by the Jordanian army and that includes the Old City of Jerusalem where Jews were a large group from before zionism was a thing. If people think that Palestinian descendants have a right to go to their family's former home, why shouldn't Jewish descendants be treated differently?
