Climate Change

[Frankfooter]

look dropout ,
a 1 degree c change = a 1 degree C change be it measured in a solid, liquid or gas, be it measured in Toronto, Nunavik, Paris, a farmers field in Brazil, the north pole, the south pole , at the top of mount Everest, in the troposphere , in the stratosphere , in the mesosphere , on the moon or in deep space

You're still missing the point.
Yes, you can measure change in different places but no, that change will not be the same on the surface as it will be at 10km up in the air.

Like you think if you put your hand over a candle and reported the anomaly after blowing the candle out. With your hand right over the candle you'd notice a massive shift in temperature but if you were 10m away and blew that candle out you'd notice almost no difference.

Surface vs troposphere

But even more importantly, lets look at your chart and why it stops at 2012.

Note that, as usual, you are rehashing debunked, 6 year old claims.

 

[JohnLarue]

]You're still missing the point.
Yes, you can measure change in different places but no, that change will not be the same on the surface as it will be at 10km up in the air.

yes it is, you blithering fool

a 1 degree c change = a 1 degree C change be it measured in a solid, liquid or gas, be it measured in Toronto, Nunavik, Paris, a farmers field in Brazil, the north pole, the south pole , at the top of mount Everest, in the troposphere , in the stratosphere , in the mesosphere , on the moon or in deep space


you do not even understand the greenhouse gas theory
google search

In which atmosphere layer does most of the greenhouse effect occur?

the troposphere

Explanation: The greenhouse effect happens almost entirely in the troposphere, which is the layer closest to the Earth.Mar 23, 2016

case closed

explain how an Atmospheric Gas CO2 manages to heat up the surface faster than the Atmosphere ?
be sure to explain how your morons theory obeys the laws of Thermodynamics , the Stephan Law and conservation of energy




you climate models are junk as is all the propaganda based on them

 

[Frankfooter]

FYI this is taught in grade 10, so you can blame your scientific ignorance on your decision to drop out of high school

You do realize that you would fail grade 10 science with your failed theories about the greenhouse effect and warming.
Your attempt to use apple and orange comparisons between surface and troposphere would fail.
Your use of intentionally out of date charts would fail.

You would fail high school science, larue.

https://www.dcp.edu.gov.on.ca/en/sci-tech-key-changes

 

[JohnLarue]

You would fail high school science, larue.

my diplomas, degrees say otherwise

you are a science know nothing , high school drop out

you do not even understand the greenhouse gas theory
yet you have been a lying, abusive, obnoxious pusher of false propaganda on the subject
life has a way of evening the score on despicable people.
you will have a lot to answer for

google search

In which atmosphere layer does most of the greenhouse effect occur?

the troposphere

Explanation: The greenhouse effect happens almost entirely in the troposphere, which is the layer closest to the Earth.Mar 23, 2016

case closed

explain how an Atmospheric Gas CO2 manages to heat up the surface faster than the Atmosphere ?
be sure to explain how your morons theory obeys the laws of Thermodynamics , the Stephan Law and conservation of energy

you climate models are junk as is all the propaganda based on them

 

[K Douglas]

The insanity of climate alarmism is put on full display
A professor no less

Since withdrawn "not because I regret it" but because "people took it the wrong way."


How did he expect people to take "the culling of the human population" ?



View attachment 325820

The global warming movement is rooted in anti-population theory. The UNEP was founded by Maurice Strong who was a population control advocate

 

[JohnLarue]

The global warming movement is rooted in anti-population theory. The UNEP was founded by Maurice Strong who was a population control advocate

pure evil

 

[Frankfooter]

my diplomas, degrees say otherwise

you are a science know nothing , high school drop out

you do not even understand the greenhouse gas theory
yet you have been a lying, abusive, obnoxious pusher of false propaganda on the subject
life has a way of evening the score on despicable people.
you will have a lot to answer for

you climate models are junk as is all the propaganda based on them

You are the one here claiming increasing CO2 will not warm the planet through the greenhouse effect.
That fails you in high school and makes you a laughing stock to all scientists.

What was your degree in, phys ed?

 

[Frankfooter]

The global warming movement is rooted in anti-population theory. The UNEP was founded by Maurice Strong who was a population control advocate

Wacko theory, kirk.

 

[JohnLarue]

You are the one here claiming increasing CO2 will not warm the planet through the greenhouse effect.

that's right ......saturation of the 15 micron wavelength
C02 has been at 4, 000 ppm and life on the planet thrived

our climate system is far too complex to be controlled by a trace gas at 400 parts per million
the blue planet is 70% covered in water, natures universal coolant

That fails you in high school

Ahh. ....... No
??? How the hell would you know what is tested in high school ? you dropped out to avoid the tests , you know fuzzy math & logic

and makes you a laughing stock to all scientists.

wrong again
wacked out fear mongering irrational, dishonest activists are likely not big fans, but I do not let that deprive me of any sleep

What was your degree in, phys ed?

wrong again
degrees not degree
science requires attention to detail, and reading comprehension frankfooter
your decision to drop out of high school was a poor decision

why are you always wrong ?

don't you get tired of being wrong all the god damn time ?


explain how an Atmospheric Gas CO2 manages to heat up the surface faster than the Atmosphere ?
be sure to explain how your morons theory obeys the laws of Thermodynamics , the Stephan Law and conservation of energy

note how the satellite anomalies have been independently verified by weather balloon anomalies

 

[Frankfooter]

that's right ......saturation of the 15 micron wavelength
C02 has been at 4, 000 ppm and life on the planet thrived

What was the temperature of the planet when CO2 levels were 4,000 ppm, larue?

 

[JohnLarue]

Wacko theory, kirk.

yes the catastrophic AGW theory is proving to be more and more wacko everyday

speaking of wackos

 

[Frankfooter]

yes the catastrophic AGW theory is proving to be more and more wacko everyday

speaking of wackos

 

[HungSowel]

my diplomas, degrees say otherwise

What diplomas and degrees do you have?

 

[JohnLarue]

What diplomas and degrees do you have?

the ones hanging on my wall

 

[Frankfooter]

the ones hanging on my wall

You got it here?

 

[JohnLarue]

You got it here?

again you seem very confused about simple concepts such as singular vs. plural
that concept was taught to you in grade school long before you dropped out
you must have that kid who was sitting in the back of the class eating the Elmer's paste glue rather than learning

 

[Frankfooter]

again you seem very confused about simple concepts such as singular vs. plural
that concept was taught to you in grade school long before you dropped out
you must have that kid who was sitting in the back of the class eating the Elmer's paste glue rather than learning

Clearly you can't have a degree in the sciences.
Definitely not in eng lit, or anything in the humanities or arts.
So its most likely phys ed.

 

[JohnLarue]

Clearly you can't have a degree in the sciences.
Definitely not in eng lit, or anything in the humanities or arts.
So its most likely phys ed.

too funny
know many phys ed grads who are able to describe the absorption mechanism of electromagnetic radiation by organic molecules with dipole moments?
you are not very bright

 

[Frankfooter]

too funny
know many phys ed grads who are able to describe the absorption mechanism of electromagnetic radiation by organic molecules with dipole moments?
you are not very bright

Do I know any chemical engineers with real degrees who think the greenhouse effect isn't real?
There's no way you could pass with your theories.

 

[JohnLarue]

Do I know any chemical engineers with real degrees who think the greenhouse effect isn't real?

I have never stated the greenhouse theory is invalid
water vapour has a dipole moment and absorbs infrared radiation at multiple frequencies

water is such an amazing molecule >> Natures universal temperature regulator

catastrophic AGW is however not at all supported by empirical evidence

why would I point out the greenhouse effect is almost entirely occurring in the troposphere if the greenhouse theory was invalid ?
you really should stop misrepresenting others.... that is the behaviour of an ill mannered child

There's no way you could pass with your theories.

too funny
what makes you think the physical laws of nature I agree with are my theories ?
I can not take credit for the work of Plank, Stephan , Boltzmann and so many other brilliant scientists

you are not very bright