This is the route the UN should go.Like I said, conjecture. As for now, nothing concrete.
This is the route the UN should go.Like I said, conjecture. As for now, nothing concrete.
No, Shazi, I'm not putting a time limit on it.So we can tale it from your posts, with the multitude of "evidence" you have contributed to this point and what you claim the ICC and ICJ have already had for months, if the UN passes no resolution in the next 4-6 weeks you will admit that Israel is not an apartheid state.
That's the opinion of an individual. It proves nothing. No resolutions like #1761 have passed.This is the route the UN should go.
Silly question.They can donate their money directly to Israel. What do they need AIPAC for?
Genostradamus. LOLNo, Shazi, I'm not putting a time limit on it.
I fully expect that Biden will live another 4-6 weeks and veto any such resolution.
Every accusation by a Ziontologist is a confession.He alwaaayys diverts when he's losing a debate. The only exception is when he chooses to just lie outright.
I love how you equate donating to Israel to donating to cancer. Overdetermined.Silly question.
Why do people donate to the Cancer Society when they can give money directly to cancer patients? Because giving money to an organization ensures that the money can be used in a co-ordinated manner more efficiently. Regardless, people can donate their money wherever they want. AIPAC is a legal entity.
Yet.That's the opinion of an individual. It proves nothing. No resolutions like #1761 have passed.
Yes the crowd was pro-Israel from the start 61-39. But it ended 66-34. Which means that the Murray/Hausdorff team won over 5% more.Doesn't mean much. The debate is being hosted in a very pro-Israel country, Canada and the debate itself was hosted by an organization that was established by someone Jewish, so not sure about the diversity of the audience invited to the debate. Especially because the majority were pro-Israeli to start with as evidenced by them being 61% for the motion even before the debate started.
Why do the donors of AIPAC not give that money straight to Israel?Silly question.
Why do people donate to the Cancer Society when they can give money directly to cancer patients? Because giving money to an organization ensures that the money can be used in a co-ordinated manner more efficiently. Regardless, people can donate their money wherever they want. AIPAC is a legal entity.
Frankie/Geno posts anything he sees on twitter as actual facts. He's brainwashed by social media whores.You've posted so many lies and fake, unsubstantiated photos, Geno, that you have no credibility. Your images are all photoshopped propaganda.
BTW, if you had a good, cutting name for me you'd stick with. When I mention Geno, everybody automatically knows that I'm referring to you. It's perfect, because you've accused so many of us as supporting genocide that it no longer has any resonance. Just like the boy who cried wolf, you've overused it.
Geno, I sometimes forget what your actual handle is.
Its who you quote from on the xitter.Frankie/Geno posts anything he sees on twitter as actual facts. He's brainwashed by social media whores.
Don't people donate to the cancer society in the hope of providing a cure. Patients also have need for money but they don't do medical research.Silly question.
Why do people donate to the Cancer Society when they can give money directly to cancer patients? Because giving money to an organization ensures that the money can be used in a co-ordinated manner more efficiently. Regardless, people can donate their money wherever they want. AIPAC is a legal entity.
So are you saying AIPAC buying politicians is supposed to cure something?Don't people donate to the cancer society in the hope of providing a cure. Patients also have need for money but they don't do medical research.
If I wanted to help people with cancer I am guessing there would be other go to groups that focus on that.
.Yet.
And there has not been a trial at the ICC and ICJ.
Already answered.Why do the donors of AIPAC not give that money straight to Israel?
Sure there are differences. The point is that the donor is free to decide where their money will best be served based on what their priorities are.Don't people donate to the cancer society in the hope of providing a cure. Patients also have need for money but they don't do medical research.
If I wanted to help people with cancer I am guessing there would be other go to groups that focus on that.