That’s your racism, not anyone else’s. Whovever taught you this narrative has played you for a fool.
Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
and yet you justify the slaughter of Jews without knowing anything about them and whether they are zionists or secular or anything else. Your Jew hatred is obvious to anyone who reads your posts.
It also says 95% say they will never forgive or forget what Israel has done and that 97% no dislike the US.
It also says they think they will be victorious.
What do you think is Israel's endgame with this attack?
What do you think will happen afterwards?
Except that's not what people supporting Palestinian rights are saying at all.
Its very specifically about Israeli policy and the zionist movement.
There have been clear as day calls for the removal of Palestinians from West Bank and Gaza, both by poster(s) here and by officials in the Israeli government. That's a lot different than migrants from Mexico entering the US.
I've only criticized the IDF and Israeli government, and their tactics against the mostly civilian population of Gaza. So I'm not exactly sure why you think that is "incendiary language" meant to "stir up Jew hatred".
Were all Palestinians involved in the incidents you posted, or just a small group?Thanks! Please quote the source for your 2.2M Palestinians. I might need to update my % from 1.1% dead to a neglible <0.5% dead otherwise. 'cause you know, <0.5% in an urban warefare situation is SOOOOOO very unique that we must call it genocide and ethnic cleansing
It is not the policy of the government of Israel that Palestinians be removed. They were advised to leave the north in order to avoid casualties. That is the opposite of ethnic cleansing. The idf does not target civilians . It targets tunnels and command and control and rocket launchers which your hero’s in Hamas have embedded in hospitals etc. regrettably . Hamas has both discouraged and actively prevented many Palestinians from leaving the north. Any loss of civilian life is a tragedy but are you aware of some bounty which would allow 1200 civilians to be slaughtered and 240 to be taken hostage and do nothing. The problem here is Hamas not the Palestinian people who have been held captive by Hamas which has diverted resources and billions in aide to enriching their leaders and building tunnels and rockets rather than a country.
Where did I say it's acceptable? I have pointed out time and again...collateral damage is unacceptable but the outrage in this conflict has some underlying agenda...specially when there are cries of "genocide" when the deaths here are nowhere near "genocidal" levels...this isn't even close to the Black September massacre of palestinians by Jordan...you notice the pattern though? no outrage...why is this different despite the deaths of palestinians are result of retaliation by Israel, from Hamas...the deaths of palestinian civilians no matter the number was AVOIDABLE..until October 7 happened....
Reality isn't your thing, is it?THAT's your criticism?
IDF estimated around 20,000 dead around the same time the numbers from Gaza were around 10,000. Since you don't trust the numbers out of Gaza, you must believe the IDF estimate of about 2x the casualties. Knowing there's 2x the amount of dead Palestinian babies must make you so very happy.
if you have read my posts I have always said that crtisim and hatred of the state of Israel and its policies (and there is much to criticize) is not necessary antisemitism. Calls for the river to the sea is.
Hamas releases 2 female hostages as ceasefire extends to a 7th day: Full coverage of Israel-Hamas war (yahoo.com)
It appears that the ceasefire pause has been extended. Hopefully it will keep being extended with more and more hostage/prisoners being exchanged.
This despite the killing of 3 innocent Israelis at a bus stop in Jerusalem yesterday, which Hamas has admitted was carried out by members of their military wing.
Thankfully Israel chose to not let that act of murderous and vile Hamas aggression scuttle the deal.
Anyways here we are closing in on 10,000 posts in this thread. How high can we go?
It appears that the ceasefire pause has been extended. Hopefully it will keep being extended with more and more hostage/prisoners being exchanged.
This despite the killing of 3 innocent Israelis at a bus stop in Jerusalem yesterday, which Hamas has admitted was carried out by members of their military wing.
Thankfully Israel chose to not let that act of murderous and vile Hamas aggression scuttle the deal.
Anyways here we are closing in on 10,000 posts in this thread. How high can we go?
So IDF estimated they killed about 20k of Hamas terrorists...they didn't say palestinians...
They have destroyed 47% of all housing in the north.
That's because, like most of the zionists on this board, they don't think there are civilian Palestinians, just 'terrorists'.
That's how you get people to go along with genocide, you say you aren't killing people, you're killing 'terrorists'.
Last edited:
Calls for 'river to the sea' are not antisemitic, its a call for freedom for Palestinians from river to sea.
Basketcase and canadaman both argued saying 'Free Palestine' is antisemitic, this is the same.
Demanding equality is not antisemitic.
Absurd. It has one meaning and every one knows it. Your attempts to try and whitewash it is just more evidence of your Jew hatred.I think the slogan has been hijacked and misinterpreted to push Israeli propaganda. From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free, is simple enough to mean, that Palestinians will have freedom throughout the land of present day Israel, Gaza and the West Bank. That is not a genocidal slogan. It is simply misinterpreted as such to both deny the Palestinians statehood and justify Israeli oppression. So stop misinterpreting things and resorting to rhetoric. If you want to discuss issues, discuss it honestly.
What does it mean?
To Palestinian and Israeli observers alike, different interpretations over the meaning of the slogan hang on the term “free”.
Nimer Sultany, a lecturer in law at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London, said the adjective expresses “the need for equality for all inhabitants of historic Palestine”.
“Those who support apartheid and Jewish supremacy will find the egalitarian chant objectionable,” Sultany, a Palestinian citizen of Israel, told Al Jazeera.
Freedom here refers to the fact that Palestinians have been denied the realisation of their right to self-determination since Britain granted the Jews the right to establish a national homeland in Palestine through the Balfour Declaration of 1917.
“This continues to be the crux of the problem: the ongoing denial of Palestinians to live in equality, freedom and dignity like everyone else,” Sultany said.
‘From the river to the sea’: What does the Palestinian slogan really mean?
Critics have called its use anti-Semitic amid Israel’s war on Gaza. But the slogan has more complex roots.www.aljazeera.com
Netanyahu's career is over as soon as there is a ceasefire, he's going to kill Palestinians as long as he can.
From the river to the sea means freedom from the death camp of Gaza.
It's not Israeli "policy", but they do it anyways.
Israelis Who Left Gaza Settlements in 2005 Want to Return
Until 2005, some 9,000 Israelis lived in 21 settlements inside the Gaza Strip
www.voanews.com
Israeli settlers aren’t pausing the expulsion and dispossession in the West Bank
***
www.haaretz.com
