Israel at war

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
The fact remains that:

South Africa created it and set the terms. It was discrimination of their own citizens based on skin colour. In ANY country of the world no non-citizens get the same rights as legitimate citizens do.

Are Gazans treated differently than Israelis? Sure. But come up with another term because "by definition" it is not apartheid.

Oh! And by the way, the fact that Israel has instituted measures against Gaza that are oppressive DID NOT HAPPEN IN A VACUUM (Back at ya'.). Rockets were being fired from Gaza.
That's so sad, shack.

Even Israelis say Israel is apartheid. Israel lost this debate years ago and your denials are just sad and stupid. 'use another term', 'we won't let them become citizens so they don't count', 'sure we treat them differently'. I'd laugh if you weren't serious and using it as justification to support killing children.

New all population Israeli-Palestinian survey: 45% of those living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea believe “apartheid” is an appropriate description of the regime
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
No the Crime of Apartheid can be committed anywhere and citizenship is not a criteria.
So Canada, not allowing an American to vote in Canadian elections or get healthcare like OHIP is apartheid? Your posts are getting stupider and stoopider.

Citizenship is a central component. S. Africa discriminated only on their own citizens.

Please tell me which citizens of countries outside of S. African borders did their policy include.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
Nobody in my world supports genocide or the war on Palestinians.
Its just here on this board, that skews very right, that its a problem.

Even here how many Israel supporters are there?
5?
10?
Let's just say that you're outnumbered 10:1

You are an unwelcomed pariah.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
No the Crime of Apartheid can be committed anywhere and citizenship is not a criteria.
Of course it is. That policy and definition was invented by S. Africa and it was intended to differentiate between citizens. Nobody who was a citizen of another country was affected.

Please show me where what I said is not accurate.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
Only if both sides are held to the law, the occupation and apartheid ended and full human rights given to Palestinians can this cycle of violence end.
Do you ever get tired of being wrong.

If Hamas surrenders and releases all their hostages that would be the quickest end to the violence.

Why do you support the unnecessary deaths of more and more Gazans?
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
The crime of apartheid is defined by the 2002 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court as inhumane acts of a character similar to other crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime".
The crime of apartheid was defined in the 50's by the S. African legislature who invented and instituted it.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
There is something called a ceasefire.

There is something called a release of hostages.

They are very different.

Release the hostages.
Tell that to Netanyahu, Hamas offered but he decided to invade instead.
Besides, you don't even know how many of those killed on Oct 7 were by the IDF obeying the Hannibal Directive.
You really should be pissed at Netanyahu.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
Never have and never will.

Fortunately Israel treats all of their citizens equally.
And won't give people citizenship based on race.
Still apartheid, buddy.
Your argument is so stupid that even mitch wouldn't fall for it.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,155
113
Never have and never will.
You have definitely been defending genocide here.

The plague spreading vermin need to be eradicated and the whole civilized world know it.

I look at it not necessarily as a war crime. It is simply war. Bad shit happens to innocent people during wars. And stuff like this has been going on for thousands of years and has been used hundreds of times.

It's a modern day version of a siege. Surround and isolate the city. Cut the city off from the rest of civilization. It's an old tactic.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,424
9,979
113
Toronto
You are playing very loose with your words. Where have I justified Hamas' tactics? Hamas' tactics is to kill unsuspecting civilians.
So killing people is bad but taking civilian hostages is OK. What kind of person are you?

You refuse to say that Hamas should release all the hostages which is the same as saying that you approve of Hamas continuing to keep all those hostages.

Why do you support Hamas' continuation of a war crime when you boldly claim that you are against war crimes.

You are being a bald-faced liar. You are justifying and supporting the taking of civilian hostages.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts