For the first time in the country’s history, Justin Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act, unleashing new powers
- Thread starter Claudia Love
- Start date
Canadian ATMs Now Asking Your Political Views Before Allowing You To Withdraw Money
CANADA—Under orders from the Supreme Chancellor of the People's Republic of Canada Justin Trudeau, all bank ATMs across the provinces will now require anyone attempting to withdraw money from their accounts to take a small quiz on their political beliefs.babylonbee.com
Fixed it for you. The Emergencies Act Bill was introduced to Parliament by Attorney General Perrin Beatty, on behalf of the Mulroney Government, to deal with the Oka Crisis.
You cannot comprehend what he said. Here goes:
So he just took a single point where it was within the polling error. Hence any Scientist will tell you that You just cannot consider that as the "downward trend". Look at the whole picture from the time he was won the elections back in 2019. maybe now You get it!!
Happening right now.........Resist tyranny!
IDK, O-guy!
That exhortation has all the hallmarks of May 1, 1945 in Der Fuhrerbunker in Berlin. You know, when the 12 year old Hitler Youth kiddies were being urged to Save Germany by throwing themselves under the tracks of the Soviet tanks!
You still don't get it, a trend can be from whatever starting point you choose. In this case he said the trend was down FROM that point, he never said he only used one data point.
Starting points of course are crucial in observing data. He was discussing what happened AFTER a certain event occurred, so he is quite right to observe the trend after that point.
It doesn't prove causality, but nowhere did he say that the trend consisted of only one data point as you mysteriously cling to.
LOL, your sentence merely made a statement, an ASSERTION, that I do not make coherent arguments, with no evidence or reasoning whatsoever, hence it itself was not a coherent argument.
It is only an assertion that you do not make coherent arguments if you are stupid at math, but if you are a math genius then that is merely a true statement that really does not need to be said.
How many data points are on the graph subsequent to the start of the protests?
The trend actually looks increasing over the last 5 points or so.
Looks like the anti-vaxxers just did Trudeau the favour of justifying the emergencies act.
Just when it looked like it was all done...
vancouversun.com
Just when it looked like it was all done...
Pacific Highway border reopens after vaccine mandate protests Saturday
RCMP said most protesters and vehicles had departed the Pacific Highway border crossing late Saturday after another day of border protests
vancouversun.com
Mr Nasty at play once again!! I put together numerous legal documentations. In those contracts and legalized statements we have to address the registered client as "You" and not you.Any reason why you keep capitalizing "You"??
Well, no big deal if it is stated so on this board except to individuals that trivialize it.
Once again you and Nasty just cannot comprehend that when You have several points in a graph, you just cannot pick or choose two points that are within the "Polling Error" to label them as a trend. The polling percent error is normally around 3 percentage points. If a slight dip occurs that is within this 3 percentage points, then clearly it is not "going South fast" as Nasty clearly stated below in that Post. It was 42% on Jan 22nd and then 40% on Feb 22nd. The 2% points difference are within the percent error. So barnacle justify this statement?
The OVERALL TREND is a steady 40% if You Average it since April 21st of last year. Take a look at the graph below:
Trudeau Tracker -
Tracking Prime Minister Trudeau ‘Generational fairness’?: Seven-in-ten Gen Z, Millennials say Trudeau’s government not working in their interest April 24, 2024 No Bounce: Liberals’ hoped-for support surge in wake of under-40 targeted spending blitz has yet to materialize April 23, 2024 Load More
angusreid.org
Maybe You get it now barnacle!!
But any comment from You with regards to nasty's following post as you purportedly are policing this name calling on politicians:
Denial is a powerful thingOnce again you and Nasty just cannot comprehend that when You have several points in a graph, you just cannot pick or choose two points that are within the "Polling Error" to label them as a trend. The polling percent error is normally around 3 percentage points. If a slight dip occurs that is within this 3 percentage points, then clearly it is not "going South fast" as Nasty clearly stated below in that Post. It was 42% on Jan 22nd and then 40% on Feb 22nd. The 2% points difference are within the percent error. So barnacle justify this statement?
The OVERALL TREND is a steady 40% if You Average it since April 21st of last year. Take a look at the graph below:
Trudeau Tracker -
Tracking Prime Minister Trudeau ‘Generational fairness’?: Seven-in-ten Gen Z, Millennials say Trudeau’s government not working in their interest April 24, 2024 No Bounce: Liberals’ hoped-for support surge in wake of under-40 targeted spending blitz has yet to materialize April 23, 2024 Load More
Maybe You get it now barnacle!!
But any comment from You with regards to nasty's following post as you purportedly are policing this name calling on politicians
