For the first time in the country’s history, Justin Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act, unleashing new powers

[bver_hunter]

Denial is a powerful thing

Bahahahahahahaha. You have lost the argument. So zip up!!

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Bahahahahahahaha. You have lost the argument. So zip up!!

Dont forget to wear your mask when you hop in your Hyundai tonight

 

[pavel bure]

Once again you and Nasty just cannot comprehend that when You have several points in a graph, you just cannot pick or choose two points that are within the "Polling Error" to label them as a trend. The polling percent error is normally around 3 percentage points. If a slight dip occurs that is within this 3 percentage points, then clearly it is not "going South fast" as Nasty clearly stated below in that Post. It was 42% on Jan 22nd and then 40% on Feb 22nd. The 2% points difference are within the percent error. So barnacle justify this statement?

The OVERALL TREND is a steady 40% if You Average it since April 21st of last year. Take a look at the graph below:

Trudeau Tracker -

Tracking Prime Minister Trudeau The Freeland Factor: Among potential Trudeau replacements, can ex-minister save a sinking Liberal ship? The Federal Liberals’ New Year’s Eve Nightmare: Party vote intent sinks to 16%, Trudeau approval at all-time low End of year review: While Trudeau’s future is...

angusreid.org

Maybe You get it now barnacle!!

But any comment from You with regards to nasty's following post as you purportedly are policing this name calling on politicians:

The polling error is 3% with a 95% confidence limits. A margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level means that if we fielded the same survey 100 times, we would expect the result to be within 3 percentage points of the true population value 95 of those times. Taking it into consideration then there is no downward trend even from Jan 22nd of last year. Accordingly, from January 22nd it is then correct to state that there is no real trend. I agree with You bver_hunter that the overall trend according to that particular poll is a steady trend especially as the majority of Canadians also supported this Emergency Act.

 

[pavel bure]

Dont forget to wear your mask when you hop in your Hyundai tonight

Do you have the registration of everyone's licence plate. Did not know that bver_hunter loves a Hyundai. What do you drive?

 

[saxon]

OK, so here's my take on all of this:

1) Emergency powers are not required, the police can deal with all this without resorting to bank accounts, crimes bringing children there etc.
2) Nobody should ever be able to prevent other people from moving around public places, unless they have a permit. If they do, with a bit of a warning , they should be forcibly removed. Given a ticket, like a parking ticket., unless of course they get violent, then they can and should be charged criminally.

3) Who does this include? A N Y B O D Y.

Truckers blocking key access points at the border.
Truckers blocking city streets.
Illegal overnighters in public parks.
Native people blocking bridges.
Native people people blocking rail lines.
Native people blocking roads in Caledonia.
Unions blocking access to factories and workplaces.
People marching down the Gardiner to support causes in other countries or for any other reason.
People blocking the pride parade until their demands are met.

You can't pick and choose who you apply the law to, based on which side you 'like'.

The NDP have stated they will support the use of the Emergencies Act but only if it’s not used against Indigenous, climate or union protesters. So Singh is playing favourites and that makes this whole thing a joke.

 

[bver_hunter]

Dont forget to wear your mask when you hop in your Hyundai tonight

I always wear my mask when required to do so, including when passengers from outside my household are also present in my car. Is that an issue with You?
Obviously, I do not wear my mask in the "Hyundai", unless you gift me one!! Okay?

 

[barnacler]

It is only an assertion that you do not make coherent arguments if you are stupid at math, but if you are a math genius then that is merely a true statement that really does not need to be said.

What math are you referring to, and which argument?

Your sentence was clearly an unsupported assertion, because it asserted something with no evidence or reasoning.