no need to go that far. The age of consent in Canada was raised from 14 to 16 in May 2008.100 years ago 15 and 16 year olds get married and start families
no need to go that far. The age of consent in Canada was raised from 14 to 16 in May 2008.100 years ago 15 and 16 year olds get married and start families
Due to backlog the system need to hire more judges, this will eventually lead to having more supervisors to look over them.You didn't use the word, but you implied there's tacit agreement between the three parties not the kill the golden goose, rock the boat or however you wan to describe it. How does the bench makes extra cash from this agreement?
Did these 3 roles include the executioner?I never mentioned a conspiracy. They have a good thing going right now. They all make loads of extra cash over the old system of Toronto police force where the police played all three roles right at the side of the road. They were fair and for the most part impartial. Now it is a money grab due to backlogs.
Hahahaha!!!how to get banned in 30 posts or less .....
I dealt with many roadside cops in my younger days. They would go back to cruiser and see if you were on their radar or if you were charged before. Then they would usually come back and ask you a few more questions and let you off with a warning or a small fine. They were respected more now than the paper pushers we have now.Did these 3 roles include the executioner?
Right in the articlesSo I'm guessing he'll have to register as a sex-offender as well.
No more trips to the US for him
The last thing I would think of shoving down your throat is bullshit !
Are you or have you ever been a 15 year old male ? I have yet to see any case in which the 15 year old involved with a teacher - ratted on the teacher. I don't argue the frailties of a 15 year old girl because I don't know them. I do know a 15-18 year old male so having someone suggest that we throw out facts just so that we can follow a social trend to lump males and females as identical is -if I may be delicate - naive. Ditto to accept carte blanche religious moral based code that extends to the dictation of sexual behaviour in adults - yes - I will question parts of it.
How am I a hypocrite ? I have been consistent in my stance that 15 -18 year old males are not the child fodder of sex perverts - they are sexually mature beings that have in many cultures including western until Victorian times capable of marriage. I am a male - I know. Unless you are suggesting women washrooms, women's fashions and every other cultural recognition of a different sexual psyche is hypocritical - I think you are off base.
Ya, mine did. But clearly yours did not keep you from being banned. Thanksmy education level kept me out of jail. yours?
Getting listed as a sex-offender is the worst part. 20 days in jail is a cakewalk compared to that.Right in the articles
Yes, to each other, or to someone close in age. But not to a 39 year old.100 years ago 15 and 16 year olds get married and start families
I'm getting that feeling as well. Too many here see this as acceptable. I wonder if they would think the same way if it were their 15 year old daughter drinking and having sex with a 39 year old off-duty police officer.this thread is making me want to leave this board..smh
A year and a half later I would certainly think they would have done so.Pedophile site has already listed him as a pedo: http://stoppedophiles.ca/convicted-ON.html
This wasn't your good student daughter sitting in your living room. This is your runaway daughter who is sexually very promiscuous, looks older than she is, and is in repeated trouble with the law.I'm getting that feeling as well. Too many here see this as acceptable. I wonder if they would think the same way if it were their 15 year old daughter drinking and having sex with a 39 year old off-duty police officer.
Hearsay, and irrelevant. Would you be okay with your 15 year old daughter drinking and having sex with a 39 year old off-duty police officer? I thought not.This wasn't your good student daughter sitting in your living room. This is your runaway daughter who is sexually very active and in repeated trouble with the law.
Not at all.Hearsay, and irrelevant.
That's not at all what happened here. Would you feel the same way if it were your 15 year old daughter drinking and having sex with a 39 year old off-duty cop? I thought not.Not at all.
I've always been troubled by the Strict Liability aspect of "Statutory Rape" to me there seems precious little justice in a set of case facts where the girl is say a month shy of her 16th birthday, the guy she is having a sexual encounter with is say a month past his 22st birthday. She told him and testifies to the same at trial as do five of the most trustworthy of witnesses that she told him she was 17, and had a extremely realistic fake ID as to the same and everyone the police can find assume she's at least 20. The girl is perfectly willing to say she has a reputation longer than your arm, and absolutely none of this matters because she was younger than 16 and he was more than five years older than she.
And all of the above assumes a Canadian type progressive "Statutory Rape" law this can really get bad when 18 is 18 and you can actually charge both 17 year-olds in a consensual relationship with "Statutory Rape."