I don’t think it’s good reasoning to say “loyal to Trump, therefore must be dumb or cruel”
You’re basically saying,
One’s loyalties entails a transference of traits to oneself from the person receiving loyalty. E.g. A is loyal B, B is dumb, so by extension A is dumb too.
Appointments to government should not be chosen by considering loyalties
Why would either of those two statements be true or obvious? They’re super contentious. Maybe you can shore them up more.
I can see reasons why he chose these people tbh, it’s not hard to fathom
…but ya they are definitely provocative choices lmao, that’s what is just hilarious
Dumb or cruel. Or perhaps both. Maybe even smart and cruel lol.
He picked them so he does not have to face the issues he did in his first term.
He wants loyalists everywhere that will do his bidding, be yes men so he can behave like a dictator.
Essentially he wants to undermine the checks and balances that exist and greatly increase the powers of the office of the presidency.
This is a dangerous slippery slope.
Fascism is a process. This is how it starts.
So what would be the character of the person who is willing to be loyal to Trump and his policies (many of which I consider to be cruel and/or dumb)?
Dumb or cruel.
But having said that, whether or not these picks will actually be effective in executing their nefarious agenda is TBC.