PLXTO

TRUMP WINS

drewstar

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2009
682
450
63
run away
I am furious about China interference in our election so no sympathy for China mis-information spreaders
evil, traitorous and disgraceful
Youre not too bright when Ive been nothing but pro Canadian.

Acting like you are the sole source of approved information when plenty of educated Asian Canadians who grew up in Canada while having seen both cultures in depth understand US/China relations much more than you - to think the US isnt threatened by China is akin to having Liberal level IQ.

Now buzz off junior.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
3,224
2,756
113
Youre not too bright when Ive been nothing but pro Canadian.

Acting like you are the sole source of approved information when plenty of educated Asian Canadians who grew up in Canada while having seen both cultures in depth understand US/China relations much more than you - to think the US isnt threatened by China is akin to having Liberal level IQ.

Now buzz off junior.
Looks like you finally met John Larue. :)
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,555
2,259
113
So invent reasons and conspiracy theories to discredit them?
Sorry for not responding sooner.

Having an opinion that a group like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has a bias towards expanding the labor pool by any means of immigration is not a conspiracy theory. The USCOC represents employers and is a major lobbyist.

You can disagree with my perspective, but I'm not spreading innuendo of secret machinations to influence Washington.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,639
3,203
113
Youre not too bright when Ive been nothing but pro Canadian.
since when does my intelligence depend on your actions
moron

look
China has been interfering in Canadian elections
unless you are brain dead you have to know the evil slime doing this are perceived as traitors and the very worse criminals by Canadians
if you don't understand this there is something very wrong
Chinese disinformation >> same objective, no difference


Acting like you are the sole source of approved information when plenty of educated Asian Canadians who grew up in Canada while having seen both cultures in depth understand US/China relations much more than you - to think the US isnt threatened by China is akin to having Liberal level IQ.
look stupid you post something so ridiculous it could only be
1. stupid beyond description or
2. intentionally trying to spread disinformation

no country diddles with their domestic cost of borrowing to screw over another country
not by increasing, nor by decreasing interest rates
it is an astounding ridiculous concept


yet you claimed the US is trying to screw over poor China by raising interest rates ?????? WTF

your "I had a typo" there is a missing 'Not' i meant lowering rate " routine was just as ridiculous

when one lie is followed by another lie, i know i am dealing with ... a liar and an untrustworthy person

Now buzz off junior.
listen
do not address me again
do not quote me
stay away from me
 

drewstar

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2009
682
450
63
since when does my intelligence depend on your actions
moron

look
China has been interfering in Canadian elections
unless you are brain dead you have to know the evil slime doing this are perceived as traitors and the very worse criminals by Canadians
if you don't understand this there is something very wrong
Chinese disinformation >> same objective, no difference




look stupid you post something so ridiculous it could only be
1. stupid beyond description or
2. intentionally trying to spread disinformation

no country diddles with their domestic cost of borrowing to screw over another country
not by increasing, nor by decreasing interest rates
it is an astounding ridiculous concept


yet you claimed the US is trying to screw over poor China by raising interest rates ?????? WTF

your "I had a typo" there is a missing 'Not' i meant lowering rate " routine was just as ridiculous

when one lie is followed by another lie, i know i am dealing with ... a liar and an untrustworthy person



listen
do not address me again
do not quote me
stay away from me
Il address whatever I feel like addressing, you dont run this forum fool.

Just look at your unhinged responses, I got my popcorn ready just to see you predictably lose it like an unhinged liberal.

News flash, if you cant take it dont dish out insults like theyre going out of style.

This has nothing to do with foreign interference its a completely separate discussion.

You have outed yourself as a Chinaphobe quite literally.

And countries absolutely enact policies to suppress rival countries, get out of your bubble itll do you some good.

Imagine thinking Im some China spy because I call a spade a spade when I just got my MAGA and F Trudeau hats lol.

Try enrolling in some counselling sessions, itll help with all that intellectual superiority mindset of yours.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,639
3,203
113
Sorry for not responding sooner.

Having an opinion that a group like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has a bias towards expanding the labor pool by any means of immigration is not a conspiracy theory. The USCOC represents employers and is a major lobbyist.

You can disagree with my perspective, but I'm not spreading innuendo of secret machinations to influence Washington.

it is very naïve for anyone to think any govt department is free from bias and cleaner than grannies nightie
stunningly naive in fact as the departments leadership are appointed by ......... politicians
politicians who owe and grant favours , politicians in the US spend a massive amount of time 'gaining support" which is really gathering campaign donations and trading favours... to aid them in their "law making decisions"
pretending appointments within the bureaucracy are not used as trading cards is so naive

look no further than the EPA or NASA who got stacked with climate change fanatics
that does not happen by accident .......(Al Gore)

seriously, they are quite open about stacking the Supreme court but would not dare stack the EPA or the department of commerce?
very naive
 
Last edited:

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,639
3,203
113
Il address whatever I feel like addressing, you dont run this forum fool.

Just look at your unhinged responses, I got my popcorn ready just to see you predictably lose it like an unhinged liberal.

News flash, if you cant take it dont dish out insults like theyre going out of style.

This has nothing to do with foreign interference its a completely separate discussion.

You have outed yourself as a Chinaphobe quite literally.

Try enrolling in some counselling sessions, itll help with all that intellectual superiority mindset of yours.
you liked what i posted and clicked the like button many times
yet after i catch you spreading misinformation my response suddenly become unhinged????
you are just babbling more bullshit

your not very bright
now get lost
 
Last edited:

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,442
92,651
113
I was disappointed with the storming of the Capitol.

It was so flaccid. They just like walked in so dispassionately. Then left. They could’ve done something cooler like steal some documents or some shit 🤣
They pooped in the hallways and smeared poop on the walls.

It gets no cooler than hate-pooping. :poop:
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,555
2,259
113
They pooped in the hallways and smeared poop on the walls.

It gets no cooler than hate-pooping. :poop:
They literally took a giant, steaming coup in the hallway.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: mandrill

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,555
2,259
113
it is very naïve for anyone to think any govt department is free from bias and cleaner than grannies nightie
stunningly naive in fact as the departments leadership are appointed by ......... politicians
politicians who owe and grant favours , politicians in the US spend a massive amount of time 'gaining support" which is really gathering campaign donations and trading favours... to aid them in their "law making decisions"
pretending appointments within the bureaucracy are not used as trading cards is so naive

look no further than the EPA or NASA who got stacked with climate change fanatics
that does not happen by accident

seriously, they are quite open about stacking the Supreme court but would not dare stack the EPA or the department of commerce?
very naive
JL, you might have read into this that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a branch of the government. The USCOC is a private organization that represents employers. My take is they are nothing but biased. That's their job.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,639
3,203
113
JL, you might have read into this that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a branch of the government. The USCOC is a private organization that represents employers. My take is they are nothing but biased. That's their job.
i stand corrected
i thought it was a branch of the US government
U.S. Chamber of Commerce..... sounds so.... govt like

damn , dead wrong for the third time this year, .........good thing its November
the fourth time if you include my AI mix up yesterday

hold on
i mistook the United States Department of Commerce for the the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
so technically not dead wrong

3 & 1/2 times then and the "damn" gets downgraded to a "darn it"

the stacking of govt departments still occurs though

thank you for pointing out my mistake in a polite manner
some would have viciously attacked me for that ... payback is a bitch
 
Last edited:

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,555
2,259
113
As a native Hong Konger, China is most certainly not a developing nation. The infrastructure there absolutely crushes what we have in North America and Europe. The one child policy is also no longer enforced, most in the west are unaware of this.
China is an economic miracle. However, it needs far more growth to provide Western standards of living to a broader population across more of the country. The inevitable decline in population will be a drag on domestic demand. It's inevitable because the trends are baked in twenty years hence.

Sinophiles generally have a deep-seated belief in Beijing's ability to manage growth and navigate through downturns. The heavy investment/export phase is the easiest phase. It's a well-worn path followed by many industrializing countries. It's also generally easier for autocratic or oligarchic societies to implement. The first step is for the government to encourage investment and modern management techniques by liberalizing aspects of the economy in order to kick-start growth. Then the government continually reinforces a strong feedback loop between domestic profits and capital intensity (build-up). The government retains control of certain sectors and directly/indirectly subsidizes producers and capital investment at the expense of domestic consumption.

China is now facing its first great post-industrialization challenge. Economic theory suggests strong central government planning cannot effectively steer the economy through the next phase. The theory supports the view that the economy has to become more democratized. That's the sticky point because further liberalization of the economy would ultimately conflict with Beijing's power and authority.

China is a great economic story. One might even believe that China's unique form of economic development is truly extraordinary. However, I can tell you the unrelenting growth could not continue indefinitely without a bump. China has hit a rocky patch. Beijing has very difficult choices to make.

US increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl. For lack of a better term, US needs China needs more than China needs them with trading as an example.
I'm not sure I follow the U.S. interest rate conspiracy. If anything, China earns a greater return on U.S. If you are saying the Fed's money printing in 2020-2022 was good for China, I probably would agree with that. I would not say it was good for the U.S. and its people to continue with a loose monetary policy.

Generally, trading relations are mutually beneficial. (There are instances where smaller countries trade for goods and commodities that they can't produce in scale and absolutely need.) China needs U.S. demand to run its economy. For structural reasons noted above, they have been unsuccessful in stimulating domestic demand. For obvious reasons, people mistakenly get lost in the banker/borrow analogy. It's far more complicated.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,555
2,259
113
i thought it was a branch of the US government
U.S. Chamber of Commerce..... sounds so.... govt like
I think that's what they are shooting for from an image perspective. The USCOC wants to appear to be above economic special interests.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts