TRUMP WINS

Previous Thread Next Thread
Shaquille Oatmeal

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
5,708
5,776
113
JohnLarue said:
it is not just the democrats. it is your left ideology that needs re-evaluation (ie respect for the rule of law, what defines success etc.)
Sure Reagan would be appalled with Trump but after watching the current loonie left he would have puked in disgust

if you don't buy that well......... the electorate agrees which is far more important and should be sobering issue
if you want to lose again keep pretending you have the right to identify as a cat


If your potential date rejects you in favour of Quasimodo, a new suit , haircut and breath mints is not going to cut it , you have bigger problems
claiming Quasimodo to be ugly wont work either
Click to expand...
But the country rejected Trump in 2020.
Was that a rejection of the right?
So did anything change with the right since then?
No.
So this election is not a rejection of the left, but rather the result of a vapid campaign by the democrats.
 
JuanGoodman

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
4,970
4,536
113
JohnLarue said:
it is not just the democrats. it is your left ideology that needs re-evaluation (ie respect for the rule of law, what defines success etc.)
Sure Reagan would be appalled with Trump but after watching the current loonie left he would have puked in disgust

if you don't buy that well......... the electorate agrees which is far more important and should be the sobering issue
if you want to lose again keep pretending you have the right to identify as a cat or boarders are meaningless


If your potential date rejects you in favour of Quasimodo, a new suit , haircut and breath mints is not going to cut it , you have bigger problems
claiming Quasimodo to be ugly wont work either
Click to expand...
unfortunately the left has become completely tone deaf to the real issues that are affecting everybody

and for a good reason

they are the major cause of the harsh reality we are in now
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: ezpzezpz, jimidean2011, roddermac and 1 other person
J

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,671
4,175
113
Shaquille Oatmeal said:
But the country rejected Trump in 2020.
Was that a rejection of the right?
So did anything change with the right since then?
No.
So this election is not a rejection of the left, but rather the result of a vapid campaign by the democrats.
Click to expand...

no
the democrats lost this election and they lost to a nasty mean-spirited vindictive prick

If your potential date rejects you in favour of Quasimodo, a new suit , haircut and breath mints is not going to cut it , you have bigger problems
 
Shaquille Oatmeal

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
5,708
5,776
113
JohnLarue said:
no
the democrats lost this election and they lost to a nasty mean-spirited vindictive prick

If your potential date rejects you in favour of Quasimodo, a new suit , haircut and breath mints is not going to cut it , you have bigger problems
Click to expand...
Address the 2020 loss.
Why did the nasty mean spirited prick lose to this guy below:
 
J

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,671
4,175
113
Shaquille Oatmeal said:
Address the 2020 loss.
Click to expand...
ancient history
Why did the nasty mean spirited prick lose to this guy below:
Click to expand...
1. slow response to the pandemic
2. the prick does have an off putting personality
3. a big pile of mysterious votes which I cant explain, nor can you, odd how the 2020 vote count was such an anomaly
4. The electorate still had some confidence in the democrats (that's gone now)

your missing the point

if your potential date rejects you in favour of Quasimodo, a new suit , haircut and breath mints is not going to cut it , you have bigger problems
time for the loonie left to re-evaluate
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76 and jimidean2011
Shaquille Oatmeal

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
5,708
5,776
113
JohnLarue said:
ancient history

1. slow response to the pandemic
2. the prick does have an off putting personality
3. a big pile of mysterious votes which I cant explain, nor can you, odd how the 2020 vote count was such an anomaly
4. The electorate still had some confidence in the democrats (that's gone now)

your missing the point

if your potential date rejects you in favour of Quasimodo, a new suit , haircut and breath mints is not going to cut it , you have bigger problems
time for the loonie left to re-evaluate
Click to expand...
We had a vaccine in 9 months.
No debate on point 2.
There were no mysterious votes. The election had a higher turn out.
True. And this is the reason. They need to fix this for 2028.
 
L

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,374
10,371
113
Shaquille Oatmeal said:
Harris: "Do not come"
Trump: "I'm gonna come"
Bernie: "We must come together"
Biden: "Come on man"
Click to expand...
Republican voters: “Trump can cum in our ass as long as we can cum on libs”
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill and Shaquille Oatmeal
D

drewstar

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2009
682
450
63
JohnLarue said:
jumping from one pile of steaming bullshit to a different pile of steaming bullshit does nothing to improve your credibility

US interest rate policy is strictly used to influence domestic price stability
it is controlled by the Federal reserve which is non political


no rational economist in the western world would ever state us interest rate policy was used to 'screw' over another country


besides
" US increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."

doesn't appear grammatically correct by adding a "not" as if this was the typo you now claim

" not US increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
or
" US not increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
or
" US increased their interest rates not in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
or
" US increased their interest rates in not an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."
or
" US increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China not this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."

it just does not fit or make sense

the only place this statement makes any sense is if it is Chinese propaganda misinformation

so we are back to
there are only two possible reasons why you would state
" US increased their interest rates in an attempt to screw over China this year, even at the expense of their own ppl."

1. you have zero economic training and have not read any business news for 2 years and are stupid beyond belief
2. you cut and pasted translated Chinese propaganda and did not proof read your post

i do not believe you to be stupid beyond belief, but you tell us
which is it ?
Click to expand...
Wow tough guy you are :)

Unfortunately for you I could care less of your condescending opinion. Cheers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom