TRUMP WINS
- Thread starter hungry
- Start date
Lol I have resilient vaginal walls. Also I included me after work snooze<begin newfie accent here> By the Jeezus I sure hope yer after using a lot of that New Foundland petroleum lube or that kitty of yours will be some smokin' after 20 hours of work. How any miles does that put on the old crotchometer?
And God knows yer not a Newfoundlander... no respectable Newfie ever worked that long!
Lol my last customer left early so I’m drinking wine. We didn’t get anywhere bc he was wearing his sunglasses the whole time and i was internally cackling
Except one side doesn't believe in men participating in women's sports, and the other doesn't require someone to provide ID to cast their vote.
Indeed they are.
and if you think I can’t demonstrate how justified they were then you have underestimated me sir
An old buddy of mine used to say that shoes should be made of pussy skin.... it never wears out even after thousands of miles!
Nah, that's because of posts like this, where you argue you show cognitive empathy but really show a more psychopathic attempt to belittle another person's feelings instead of empathizing with them. Cognitive empathy still requires empathy.Imma win
that’s why you guys call us psychopaths
I wish you wouldn't
it will lead to no good
is it that important to you to prove that you are better and smarter
I will admit that your first reply post was very insightful
but the way you went about showcasing your exceptional knowledge on this subject was hurtful
Last edited:
So apply the rule of law, and deport violent criminals.
And strengthen border security at the same time. I am not proposing an open border.
For the 11M pre-existing illegal immigrants, this so called rule of law has not been applied for many decades.
It is legally complicated as well as they have ties to the land now.
So deporting them under the guise of applying the rule of law, is not really about the application of the rule of law if we are being honest.
The real intent is far right blood and soil nationalism.
When your choice is between helping someone who is otherwise an upstanding citizen become legal residents vs destroying their families, choosing the latter, is not an intent to apply rule of law, but to purposefully hurt people.
Hence dangerous.
Instead, as you have suggested, in your second point here, give them a legal path to citizenship (or another status that is legal).
Combined with deportation of criminals and stronger borders, it would reduce illegal immigration in the future while avoiding a humanitarian crisis in the present.
Nothing radical here.
It is quite common to enact new laws, repeal old ones, modify old ones.
I am proposing to enact new ones and modify old ones and then apply them.
It does not go against your strict "rule of law" argument.
Beyond this I am not going to keep repeating this.
I believe I have said this enough number of times
Last edited:
Trump has started to twist the knife into Repugs that he feels didn't back him up enough. LMAOI
I find this enjoyable, very enjoyable.
Mike Pompeo, Nikki Haley and Ben Shapiro all feel the blade going in and being twisted and I love it!!!
Trump TWISTS THE KNIFE: Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro PUBLICLY HUMILIATED!
I find this enjoyable, very enjoyable.
Mike Pompeo, Nikki Haley and Ben Shapiro all feel the blade going in and being twisted and I love it!!!
Trump TWISTS THE KNIFE: Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro PUBLICLY HUMILIATED!
It doesn’t require it. It’s nice to have. And I am very selective about that
cognitive empathy just means attributing the correct intentions and beliefs in an almost logical way and i have that on full blast
doesn’t mean ill have similar feelings about it
and you think a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist is the person to implement rule of law?
The rule of law only applies as long as it is convenient for them.
Yes, cognitive empathy still means you show empathy.
Your post showed an attempt at showing supremacy, not empathy by claiming that you knew what the 'correct intentions' of her post were.
That's the antithesis of empathy.
Because she was the weaker one, I was wrong? Look more closely. Was she signaling that from the time she entered the thread? Or in her initial interactions with me. You are a f f e c t i v e
plain as day
Absolutely.
The two other ladies in this thread lack that, thus they have resorted to playing the victim and projecting. Textbook left wing tactics.
he would be good with thatIt's kinda crazy that you're incapable of looking in our own backyard as an example of what unmitigated mass immigration does. I suppose we should just eliminate borders all together and put up a 'come one, come all' sign.
until they came into his house
then we would see how "welcoming" he really is
Last edited:
The liberal/democrat cult doesnt tolerate alternative views that oppose their dystopian ideology. Their sense of moral superiority is not logic based, but often driven from emotion and selective empathy.It's kinda crazy that you're incapable of looking in our own backyard as an example of what unmitigated mass immigration does. I suppose we should just eliminate borders all together and put up a 'come one, come all' sign.
You're not going to convince anyone you're showing empathy in any form like that.
All you're doing is confirming my claim that empathy is a key difference between right and left wingers.
