I don't understand why you are continually being belligerent towards JosephineJuan, I’m not cockblocking you so ignore what I say
Nice try.Nah you were too busy unsuccessfully pushing multiple agendas at the same time so you were unable to express your point in a clear, concise manner and it got lost in translation. But I get it, blame the other guy. It's ok we understand you and your motives here.
What was Trump found guilty of?Guilty of what?
No it’s not obviousI don't understand why you are continually being belligerent towards Josephine
guys do it here but it's not the same for you
we do not take it seriously, at least I don't
but it's obvious that you are actually causing her unpleasantness at best
what's the point?
guys do love a good cat fightThis thread summed up:
View attachment 375917
I resent this meme even thought I laughed because it shouldn’t even be a fight. That’s like Jake Paul and Mike Tyson ughThis thread summed up:
View attachment 375917
than consider this a "news flash"No it’s not obvious
Well you're kind of taking a heel turn...Oracle ducks for cover.I resent this meme even thought I laughed because it shouldn’t even be a fight. That’s like Jake Paul and Mike Tyson ugh
and the only reason I keep answering for myself is because everyone is acting like I’m some monster
It's not just that, they go at one another with so much passion and condescension while using ostentatious and sesquipedalian language (ROFL), that if it happened in a real life it would end up in a hot and violent lesbian sex (let the old cat fantasise, you guys).guy do love a good cat fight
how really need to go to jail is a person responsible to putting his tan. My blind cat would make a better job applying it...Pretty much felony jaywalking.
I don't think you are a monster. But I don't think we should talk to each other like that. It's already hard in this business with all the jealousy ect that I just refuse to go there with you. It's not me playing victim it's just me asking you to stop this. It's not pretty.I resent this meme even thought I laughed because it shouldn’t even be a fight. That’s like Jake Paul and Mike Tyson ugh
and the only reason I keep answering for myself is because everyone is acting like I’m some monster
you are not a monstereveryone is acting like I’m some monster
Lool, if you think you're a monster here try to go with your opinion to r/politics. Monster will seem like a praise to you there.and the only reason I keep answering for myself is because everyone is acting like I’m some monster
He did not falsify business records?Pretty much felony jaywalking.
no really tell meWell you're kind of taking a heel turn...Oracle ducks for cover.
that's exactly why it's a memeI resent this meme even thought I laughed because it shouldn’t even be a fight.
Oh, Kelly, in a real fight i will put my bets on JosephineI resent this meme even thought I laughed because it shouldn’t even be a fight. That’s like Jake Paul and Mike Tyson ugh
So apply the rule of law, and deport violent criminals.
And strengthen border security at the same time. I am not proposing an open border.
For the 11M pre-existing illegal immigrants, this so called rule of law has not been applied for many decades.
It is legally complicated as well as they have ties to the land now.
So deporting them under the guise of applying the rule of law, is not really about the application of the rule of law if we are being honest.
The real intent is far right blood and soil nationalism.
When your choice is between helping someone who is otherwise an upstanding citizen become legal residents vs destroying their families, choosing the latter, is not an intent to apply rule of law, but to purposefully hurt people.
Hence dangerous.
Instead, as you have suggested, in your second point here, give them a legal path to citizenship (or another status that is legal).
Combined with deportation of criminals and stronger borders, it would reduce illegal immigration in the future while avoiding a humanitarian crisis in the present.
Nothing radical here.
It is quite common to enact new laws, repeal old ones, modify old ones.
I am proposing to enact new ones and modify old ones and then apply them.
It does not go against your strict "rule of law" argument.
Beyond this I am not going to keep repeating this.
I believe I have said this enough number of times