The Porn Dude
Toronto Escorts

Toronto Maple Leafs 2013/14 Season

Bargnani_

Bargnani_
Apr 28, 2008
1,821
0
0
There was no specific post but just a trend that I seem to notice. It's like when somebody plays for the Leafs all the critics come out but once they leave and have a modicum of success it's like they should have never let him go.

He was decent for the Leafs and I liked him but I don't think anybody looked at him as a bellwether of a team's fortunes as you seemed to imply in your above post. Did you feel that having Scrivens last year was an indication of what type of organization the Leafs were/are?
What ? Read my post carefully ... I was talking about the Oilers organization .

... Do you think a team in Alberta could have used this Alberta kid this year ? LA's picks up of this guy shows why they are where they are and why the Oilers are where they are .
 

Dawgger

Active member
Jan 3, 2005
4,578
0
36
Ben Scrivens posts his 3rd should out of the season last night ... He is number 1 in LA for awhile till Quick gets back from injury ... Do you think a team in Alberta could have used this Alberta kid this year ? LA's pick up of this guy shows why they are where they are and why the Oilers are where they are .
LA got him because they had a goalie Toronto wanted for him. Neither the Oilers nor Flames could offer a goalie that was worth taking.
I think Scrivens is a decent back up to tender like Quick, Don't see him as number 1.
 

Bargnani_

Bargnani_
Apr 28, 2008
1,821
0
0
LA got him because they had a goalie Toronto wanted for him. Neither the Oilers nor Flames could offer a goalie that was worth taking. I think Scrivens is a decent back up to tender like Quick, Don't see him as number 1.
Josh Harding was in the same position as Scrivens ... Ben Bishop also had the label of backup before being given the wheel to the Lighting ... The more Scrivens keeps playing at the level he is at the more the back up label will be taken off ...

All I said is congrats to Schrivens and it's too bad the Oilers scouting staff didn't see what LA and the Leafs saw ... I was giving kudos to the Kings ...
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
48,404
8,638
113
Toronto
What ? Read my post carefully ... I was talking about the Oilers organization .
Ben Scrivens posts his 3rd should out of the season last night ... He is number 1 in LA for awhile till Quick gets back from injury ... ? LA's pick up of this guy shows why they are where they are .
You were clearly also talking about LA and how Scrivens' acquisition shows why they are such a good organization.
 

Bargnani_

Bargnani_
Apr 28, 2008
1,821
0
0
You were clearly also talking about LA and how Scrivens' acquisition shows why they are such a good organization.
I said my post was a reflection of two organization ( Kings and Oilers ) ... Leafs were " not " one of those two ... Although you in your constant attack mode would only see what you want to see ... " Wow " positing " LA is a great organization and Oilers not " actually
caused a debate ...
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
48,404
8,638
113
Toronto
I said my post was a reflection of two organization ( Kings and Oilers ) ... Leafs were " not " one of those two ... Although you in your constant attack mode would only see what you want to see ... " Wow " positing " LA is a great organization and Oilers not " actually
caused a debate ...
I'm not attacking, just trying to understand. Sorry you are feeling so defensive.

Ben Scrivens posts his 3rd should out of the season last night ... LA's pick up of this guy shows why they are where they are .
I agree Kings are a good organization/team and Oilers suck. That is not in question and is irrelevant to my question.

I don't understand how acquiring a run of the mill goalie like Scrivens proves how great of an organization they are. That is what I am trying to find out and what you have not explained. IMO, they could probably use any one of two dozen backup goalies and still be miles ahead of the Oilers. He just happened to be the backup the Leafs had that would go back the other way when they traded Bernier.
 

Ironhead

Son of the First Nation
Sep 13, 2008
7,014
0
36
Ben Scrivens posts his 3rd should out of the season last night ... He is number 1 in LA for awhile till Quick gets back from injury ... Do you think a team in Alberta could have used this Alberta kid this year ? LA's pick up of this guy shows why they are where they are and why the Oilers are where they are .
Yes I was .. if you have a specific post you are refering too please share ... If you can't which I am pretty sure you can't then I can ask you why are you posting this comment ? Scrivens had no haters in this city and it's nice to see he is suceeding .
It is the timing of your posts.


What ? Read my post carefully ... I was talking about the Oilers organization .
Why is it in this Leaf thread then ?
It seems to be a backhanded shot at the Leafs.





LA got him because they had a goalie Toronto wanted for him. Neither the Oilers nor Flames could offer a goalie that was worth taking.
I think Scrivens is a decent back up to tender like Quick, Don't see him as number 1.
Also the Oil did not want to part with any of their young stars, like a center, another position the Leafs need to address.





Why is it that this type of comment is only made once a player is playing for a team other than the Leafs? Were you complimenting the Leafs last year for having him on their roster?
Agree with Shack and Dawgger. Also the Leafs made a trade and got what their think may be their number one goalie for the next 10 years. As previously pointed out, the other organizations did not have(to give) what the Leafs wanted in return.
 

Bargnani_

Bargnani_
Apr 28, 2008
1,821
0
0
It is the timing of your posts.




Why is it in this Leaf thread then ?
It seems to be a backhanded shot at the Leafs.







Also the Oil did not want to part with any of their young stars, like a center, another position the Leafs need to address.







Agree with Shack and Dawgger. Also the Leafs made a trade and got what their think may be their number one goalie for the next 10 years. As previously pointed out, the other organizations did not have(to give) what the Leafs wanted in return.
Thank you Mr Moderator ... Wow you agree with Shack and Dawgger .. So unusual of you .
 

Ironhead

Son of the First Nation
Sep 13, 2008
7,014
0
36
Thank you Mr Moderator ... Wow you agree with Shack and Dawgger .. So unusual of you .
OK, fine.
Now about your timing and the placement of your post here in a Leaf thread when apparently it has nothing to do with the Leafs.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
48,404
8,638
113
Toronto
Thank you Mr Moderator ... Wow you agree with Shack and Dawgger .. So unusual of you .
Not unusual at all. Craig and I agree on many things and rarely get into anything nasty.
 

Polaris

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2007
3,076
58
48
hornyville
The Leafs look big down the middle. The new centers are all bigger than the injured and suspended Leafs centers.

This Holland kid, similar to that other 1st round center they traded away Colborune, except Holland looks more like a play maker where Colbourne more of a grinder.

Putting Holland between Kessel and Van Reimsdyke makes it easier for him. Don't get caught, and just give the puck to your wingers.

That line of Orr, Smithson, McCleran is the biggest Leafs line I have ever seen.

Nice goal by Clarkson. That's a goal scorer type of goal. Quick release, top corner. The goalie probably did not have a chance on that one.

Out shot again. I think so. Did not check. Probably out shot again. Good goal tending again.

The Leafs again beat another team below them in the standings and below .500. So again, we wait to see how good this Leafs team is, can it make the jump to being elitte?

Got to wait until Bolland comes back.

I think the biggest difference in tonight's game, is the Leafs centers played a north south game. Nothing fancy, just patrol the middle up and down. Worked tonight, two wins in this home stand.
 

Ironhead

Son of the First Nation
Sep 13, 2008
7,014
0
36
Leafs centers

Bolland is still on the shelf for at least another month.

Kadri's is eligible to return.
Bozak should be back Thursday or Saturday.

McClement
Holland
Smith
Smithson



With the acquistion of Holland, a young center with upside, could Kadri now be on the block ?
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
48,404
8,638
113
Toronto
With the acquistion of Holland, a young center with upside, could Kadri now be on the block ?
Wouldn't bother me but I don't think so.
 

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,754
518
113
RC is a 'bigger is better' kinda guy, so I'd have to think yes. After the departure of Grabs so soon after a contract signing, I don't think either Bozak or Kardi are truly safe. But because Bozak is solid on the draw, imagine he would stay for sure.
But have to say, I really like Holland on the top line and would like to see him have a couple weeks there. Its would be great having Bozak on a 2nd line giving it that much more punch.
Bigger is only better if you can skate, today's game is all about speed and quick puck movement. I think the leafs have enough "big" guys but most of them skate like they have cement on their feet.
 

Ironhead

Son of the First Nation
Sep 13, 2008
7,014
0
36
Wouldn't bother me but I don't think so.
What do you think the Leafs will do when Bozak gets back ?(Kadri back tonight)
They may wait until Bolland returns, which is still at least four/six weeks away, but what then ?

I also like Holland and would like to see him on the first or second line for five or seven games.
 

Dawgger

Active member
Jan 3, 2005
4,578
0
36
Holland has looked pretty good between Kessel and JVR! He has played 2 games for the Leafs on the top line, how will he look long term,playing with players on the third line?
I like him but too early to really give him the stamp of approval.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
48,404
8,638
113
Toronto
What do you think the Leafs will do when Bozak gets back ?(Kadri back tonight)


They may wait until Bolland returns, which is still at least four/six weeks away, but what then ?

I also like Holland and would like to see him on the first or second line for five or seven games.
I've indicated many times in the past that I don't like playing the "GM game" and I'm not really going to start here but since you asked:

As you say, they have time 'til Bolland gets back. Lots of things can happen between now and then.

If it were right now, I think Holland would get sent down. He's not going to replace any of the other 4. Kadri (the punk) still has a lot more upside potential than Holland. Maybe the suspension will be a kick in the ass for him to grow up and conduct himself like a professional.

The team is still very young and growing together as a group under Randy. It's a work in progress and if potential is realized Kadri could be a key contributor. Not sure they want to make that significant of a change yet. The "potential" factor, though, does have a best before date. Holland is more of a soldier. He can be a solid contributor but likely not a game breaker the way Kadri can be.

A trade involving Kadri would probably occur later in the season, when more options are available as more teams become cellar dweller sellers.
 

gcostanza

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2010
7,818
528
113
I'm not sure I get the rush to trade Nazem Kadri.
It is fairly typical of Maple Leafs fans, they (we) tend to eat our young players.

Nazem Kadri is a special talent, you don't (shouldn't) trade players with nifty mittens like his because of a few bumps in the road.
 

great bear

The PUNisher
Apr 11, 2004
16,171
56
48
Nice Dens
Smith is out of options and must go to waivers if the Leafs try to send him down, Holland has options, so it will be Smith left with the Leafs when the Bozak gets back.
 
Toronto Escorts