Teachers to Boycott After School Programs

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,912
6,837
113
First of all we're talking about organized extracurricular programs for kids. Secondly the answer is yes. The kids and parents have every right to complain when some teachers put kids in the middle when they don't get their way.

....
Sure they have a right to complain. They have a right to complain about their kids marks too. Doesn't mean they're right.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,912
6,837
113
Contract or no contract, teachers have a moral (if not contractual) obligation to take care of their students.
You're right. Teachers have an obligation to do their job to the best of their ability. Coaching is not their job. You could also make the same argument for parents. How many parents actually volunteer time coaching etc?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,912
6,837
113
When workers go on strike at an airline, we can fly another airline, there is no monopoly. The taxpayers did not pay for the planes and other infrastructure that is locked up by the union.
...
Your whole argument falls apart because sports is not a monopoly. There are kids leagues all over the place. Parents who are so concerned have other options (and for parents who think little johnny is going pro, they need to go way beyond school sports).
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,912
6,837
113
Exactly! There's so many unionized government employees who are paid far above what a person in the private sector would get. No wonder we pay high taxes but government is in debt, there's no money for infrastructure, roads, social programs etc. But that's a different topic.
...
From what has been previously posted, that seems untrue for teachers. It seems private school teachers are payed essentially the same.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,902
2,906
113
You're right. Teachers have an obligation to do their job to the best of their ability. Coaching is not their job. You could also make the same argument for parents. How many parents actually volunteer time coaching etc?
Missing the point.

Your whole argument falls apart because sports is not a monopoly. There are kids leagues all over the place. Parents who are so concerned have other options (and for parents who think little johnny is going pro, they need to go way beyond school sports).
Again, you're missing the point. This discussion has nothing to do with whether or not the teachers have to volunteer FFS. Of course they don't have to.

From what has been previously posted, that seems untrue for teachers. It seems private school teachers are payed essentially the same.
I wasn't specifically talking about teachers. Use a TTC fair collector making 100K with overtime as an example. I could go on and on...

Sorry to burst your bubble but is someone volunteered for something last year, that means nothing for this year. Years ago, I volunteered helping coach at a school. My job changed and I decided volunteering at a school didn't work for me any more. My boss would be pretty pissed of if I told him that I was required to leave work a couple times a week because I previously coached I'm obligated to continue in future years.
You really don't get it do you. Teachers haven't decided to stop coaching extracurricular activities because their jobs have changed or it doesn't work for them anymore. That has nothing to do with it. They are protesting decisions by the McGuinty Government and I personally thing they're a bunch of douches for doing so.

I've since heard their protest has now included refusing to help some fundraising clubs for the United Way. This will do nothing but negatively effect the people who rely on the United Way for help. Way to go teachers, talk about being excellent roll models. :confused:
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Stamping feet and holding their breath

I've since heard their protest has now included refusing to help some fundraising clubs for the United Way. This will do nothing but negatively effect the people who rely on the United Way for help. Way to go teachers, talk about being excellent roll models. :confused:
They go on strike,... for the students.

They refuse to help the clubs,...for the United Way.

FAST
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,626
3,194
113
Closer to 1/6th. http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/budget/ontariobudgets/2012/ch2g.html#c2_secG_FTC
Get your facts straight if you're gonna rant.
You are correct
It is closer to 1/6 th
I had misread that document when I last viewed it
I will take more care to be factually correct in the future
Thank you for pointing that out

Education is the second largest expenditure for the province and has grown by 10% in 2 years (about the same increase as Health care)
The third largest expenditure is interest on debt which is up 16% in the same time period
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,626
3,194
113
Facts who needs facts.
Facts are very important frank
They allow people to make informed decisions
It is also very important that one takes responsibility for misquoting a fact
Which I have done
I do need to be more careful in the future

However misquoting a number is not the same as misrepresenting yourself and implying you have an in-depth understanding of a system.
It appears you have been misrepresenting yourself for some time as well as I seem to recall back in the spring a post where you explaining how much time you spent marking.I could be wrong, however that does sound familiar.
I will let you worry about which lies you need to cover.

Now since you are not a teacher (just like to pretend to be a teacher) how can we take any information you provide on the subject as accurate ?

Credibility is such a fragile thing do you not a agree?
Oops, I guess you can not speak about credibility either because you have none
I guess that makes you a "lying whining bitch" does it not?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,912
6,837
113
Missing the point.



Again, you're missing the point. This discussion has nothing to do with whether or not the teachers have to volunteer FFS. Of course they don't have to.
Maybe I'm a bit dense but the above and below statements don't seem to jive. You seem like teachers should be told how and when they volunteer or under what cases they're allowed to stop volunteering.




You really don't get it do you. Teachers haven't decided to stop coaching extracurricular activities because their jobs have changed or it doesn't work for them anymore. That has nothing to do with it. They are protesting decisions by the McGuinty Government and I personally thing they're a bunch of douches for doing so....:
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,902
2,906
113
Maybe I'm a bit dense but the above and below statements don't seem to jive. You seem like teachers should be told how and when they volunteer or under what cases they're allowed to stop volunteering.
Yes you are. basketcase is an appropriate name. I can't help you!
 

Bachus

New member
Oct 2, 2005
75
0
0
Same pay for much higher quality teachers in private schools.
I call bull shit on that.
They are the same teachers and many go back and forth between the two systems over the course of their career and I know of plenty who would been very happy to teach in a public school but were not hired.
There are huge reasons why private sectors students do better than those in the public sector, smaller classes, greater parental involvement, greater access to all of the resources that money and socioeconomic status can buy and a culture of education in their family. ( not true for all the students in private but for the overwhelming majority of them it is).
Does that make for a better teacher? How about the one who is a school where half of the kids come to school hungry does that make for a worse teacher?
 

canuck99

New member
Aug 25, 2012
39
1
0
Sure, if teachers don't want to volunteer, then don't. All I'm saying is if they sign up at the beginning of the year, they should follow through with their commitment and not change their minds because they're not happy about something right at the beginning of the school year.

The vast majority of teachers realize this and continue to volunteer because they're honoring their commitment. They know it's the right thing to do. Good on them and it's what I'd do. My beef is with the one's who've decided to say too bad for the kids, I'm not happy with McGuinty. Really makes them look like a bunch of assholes and I'm not alone on this one.
I've told organizers that I'll be coaching next yr, but declined when the season was beginning. Had a good reason, but that's the way it goes.
We don't sign a contract to volunteer.
I've also seen coaches quit during the season. Life happens. They're volunteers.
others stepped forward just as they will for the teachers.
 

Bachus

New member
Oct 2, 2005
75
0
0
The great Irony of this whole situation is that had we taken our strike votes the issue of removal of extracurricular activities would not be on the table at all. Support for these programs is VOLUNTARY and so should not be part of the job actions. I think that this current action played right into the governments hand we should have just waited until we took a strike vote and begun to withdraw services in other ways. This did not happen and now the elementary teachers are refusing to do work that they are not being paid for, yes it hurts the kids but you can't expect people to work for free when they are being kicked in the teeth. Ultimately I think there will be a huge strike mandate and that ultimately the unions will end up in a full strike if only to challenge the unprecedented circumvention of the collective bargaining process by the provincial government. Workers have rights only of they are willing to fight to keep them. Ii will be unpopular and it will likely have a lasting effect on education but the teachers did not pick the fight. If you are mad and you all really should be. Be mad at the government and get them to repeal this law. There was no crisis, the unions were willing to meet all of the government numbers and I think given the last few contracts the province would have been able to make a good deal, the government refused to bargain in good faith. This was never about the money. It was about the government needing to look tough so that it could shore up the right side of the party and keep the PCs from gaining traction and keeping the liberals in power perhaps even back into majority. As in BC the government will be found to have been in the wrong but it will take 10 years to get a ruling by which time everyone will have forgotten all about this mess.
 

KBear

Supporting Member
Aug 17, 2001
4,169
1
38
west end
www.gtagirls.com
... There was no crisis, the unions were willing to meet all of the government numbers and I think given the last few contracts the province would have been able to make a good deal, the government refused to bargain in good faith. ...
Think the teachers were not willing to give up sick days?

If the education system was made an essential service, with the right to strike removed, this would solve the future problems from strikes.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,879
241
63
Same pay for much higher quality teachers in private schools.
Depending on the private school you may find teachers who are
a) not qualified by the same standards are public
b) not following the ontariou curriculum

Being private they can follow their own rules and operate independently.

Private schools typically get the spillover from the public system so you get some good with the bad. The difference in teaching quality is probably small over all.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,902
2,906
113
yes it hurts the kids but you can't expect people to work for free when they are being kicked in the teeth.
You must be a drama teacher.

If the deal was so bad, why did the Catholic board come to an agreement? The vast majority of working people in the Province of Ontario have little sympathy for your fight. Unfortunately you've been spoiled for far too long and when it comes time to give up a little (and by a little I mean a small amount of what very few others have to begin with) you act like little babies.

Most people who have jobs realize that when times are tough and the company they work for is going through tough economic times, they may not get a raise that year. They may have their hours, bonuses, even benefits cut. That's the reality that most people deal with. Teachers and other union employees see it differently, it's called entitlement and when you don't get what you want, you act like a child who's just had his candy taken away. You need a time out!
 
Last edited:

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,879
241
63
You must be a drama teacher.

If the deal was so bad, why did the Catholic board come to an agreement? The vast majority of working people in the Province of Ontario have little sympathy for your fight. Unfortunately you've been spoiled for far too long and when it comes time to give up a little (and by a little I mean a small amount of what very few others have to begin with) you act like little babies.

Most people who have jobs realize that when times are tough and the company they work for is going through tough economic times, they may not get a raise that year. They may have their hours, bonuses, even benefits cut. That's the reality that most people deal with. Teachers and other union employees see it differently, it's called entitlement and when you don't get what you want, you act like child who's just had his candy taken away. You need a time out!
Catholic board has what's called the me too clause. IF the public gets a better deal they can get it too. So they aren't as noble as you think. Let's say a strike happens and pay is lost by the public sector while one strike. The catholic teachers will continue to teach, make money and then get the same benefits others had to fight/sacrifice for.

In all likelihood there will be no raises but what the benefits will look like is still up in the air.
 
Toronto Escorts