Teachers to Boycott After School Programs

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Our tax dollars at work

If you want to see an excellent example of your education tax dollars being "well" spent go into the Durham District School Board website and look up their GUIDELINES TO INCLUSIVE LANGUAGE. I understand this board has spent well over one million dollars coming up with this gem. The committee is now hard at work to change the inappropriate names of the Canadian provinces. Names like Prince Edward Island, Manitoba and Alberta will be deemed to be unusable becuase of sexism (using male terminology). New Brunswick and Newfoundland will need to be changed because they disciminate against anything old. British Columbia and Nova Scotia are not acceptable becuse they imply a British background and do not reflect the realities of a world community. Ontario and Saskatchewan are to be banned bacause they are linked to native peoples and could be interrupted as a racial slur. Of course Quebec won't be changed because like all good politically correct peoples we need to bow before the almighty separtists. Further more children entering the school system beginning in September 2015 will be expected to have non-sexist names. Children with names like Robert and Roberta will not be allowed to enroll. So parents please consider naming your child with appropriate names like Parking Lot, Garbage Can, Grass, etc. Then you and your child can too can be inclusive in the vast wasteland of the Durham District School Board.
YEP,... saw one of the one of the idiots on the news talking about this with a straight face,...also,...no more "boy friends" and "girl friends",...has to be "partner".

Just more over paid civil servants being paid to do nothing !!!

FAST
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,879
241
63
make the teachers join the military, then during the summer we can deploy them to troubled areas around the globe and when they return, they will be fit and have interesting stories for the kids
Lol and the mayor could call them for snow removal
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,902
2,907
113
Lol and the mayor could call them for snow removal
Okay, off topic but are you telling me you don't know why Lastman called in the Army during that infamous snowfall in January 1999?
 
Last edited:

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,640
3,203
113
LOL more ignorance...... there are not 400K teachers, and they are not all retiring at the same time and they do not all necessarily max out on the gratuity.

You proposed savings will not even save 46 K per teacher when they retire as if I`m not mistaken days banked up to this point will be honoured.

Anyways, the rate of retirement and the savings in the short term is minimal. As teachers retiring in the next few years will likely have the max gratuity.
You are defiantly a short term thinker
Every dollar saved is important
Your trivializing the amount that would be saved, shows you have no respect for either
a) the current taxpayer or
b) future generations who will inherit this financial mess

It is not clear if this "gratuity" is to be grandfathered or not
The real shame is nobody acted 20-30 years ago to prevent us (taxpayers) from having to pay this out now
If the "gratuity" (not even trying to hide the nature of this abusive payment anymore are you?) is canceled, millions will be saved down the road.

Meanwhile, the deficit and interest on it will climb if this is all we do.
Exactly, which is why we need to do so much more (I am just getting warmed up)
The "Gratuity" (why do not just call it what it is - a retirement bonus) is the best place to start


If you really want to handle the debt aggressively you`d have to fire, slash pay and raises taxes. Realistically, I think rasing taxes is the only one that might happen in the near future.
No, that is not a realistic assessment at all
There is no appetite for increased taxes and any party that tries this before controlling costs will be committing political suicide
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...e-to-maintain-Ont-Teachers-compensation/page3
It is pretty clear no one wants to pay more taxes so teacher can maintain the status quo

So let`s see to recap
you were wrong about the gdp of ontario
you don`t know how many jobs lost by the recession have been recovered
you didn`t know that the amount of the education budget that makes up salaries has remained roughly proportional
you don`t know how many teachers are in the province
you miscalculated the short term savings of the pay freeze and stoppage of gratuity/banked sick days
you don`t know how many hours a teacher works as 4.5 h is for high school and assumes no marking, prepping, extracurriculars, meetings, parental contact
you don`t know how much of the ontario budget is accounted for by teacher`s salaries
I guess you will have to blame all that on my teachers , as they did not learn me too good
Inaccuracies ? Perhaps
I will be more careful going forward
Attempts to deceive? No
So who are you pretending to be today Frank?



you also refuse to acknowledge that for many years we were paying 15% tax and it went down to 13% in good times. Now that times are tough let`s bring it back.
Place more burden on everyone, so that your special interest group, gets to keep its ridiculous compensation package.
Absolutely not

that extra 2% could literally generate billions that could all go to the deficit (if we freeze spending on teacher salary and benefits which I said countless times is the likely outcome).
You are allocating $ again frank
We explained this to when you tried to allocate all of your pretend teachers taxes back to your pretend teachers salary in the spring
Finance is not your strength. Stick to the pretending and misrepresentation where apparently you excel
1. You are taking about a consumption tax increase- Are you out of your fucking mind ?
This hurts low income families and seniors disproportionally.

Far better to stop throwing money at an overcompensated group , than trying to take more from everyone
2. As I have said many times before tax increases will become a reality when the health care cost start to escalate
3. Thats is why is so important to get all costs under control , so that tax increases will support health care needed in 5 -10 years and not to support the debt racked up overcompensating teachers now


So in that scenario not one penny of the extra tax would go towards teachers unless you are suggesting that they should take in addition to the freeze of salarya and benefits and additional pay cut,
Now you are starting to clue in.

Teachers are paid 80% more than the average taxpayer for working 60-70% (am I am being very generous to teachers on this figure) of what the average taxpayer does. The difference in benefits is extreme
This has to be brought more into balance

While wage cuts down to an average of 65K and much lower top end caps is what is really necessary, this would lead to the biggest whining fest in the history of the province

Therefore
1. Freeze the wages for 5 years to let inflation narrow the gap between this overpaid lot and those that work to pay them
2. Slash the benefits (no more sick banking, they pay for 100% of their pension costs etc)
3. Go to a sysmestered system with teachers getting a total of 5 weeks vacation (let them at least try and earn 83K) for the same pay
4. Fire the worst performing 5-10% teachers and the next worse 5% the next year and so on

If the sysmestered system will not work then it will have to be slashing of salaries.
But no tax increases until education costs are controlled

That will put a dent in deficit and then (and only then) can we even think about tax increases to slay the debt and the expected health care increases.

Its not like I did not see the tax increase for teachers idea peculating in your tiny lying mind back in the spring (when you were misrepresenting yourself as a hard working teacher) .

And please do not try and say you increase is not for the teachers as you tied the two together (2% for the defict and teachers maintain what they have- do you think no one saw through that?).
Some might be infavour of an ta increase to pay down the debt, but only after the govt shows it can control costs


you also forget that others are entitled to an opinion, everyone here has a vote, and everyone here pays taxes.
Absolutely, it very important to respect that fact others pay taxes as well
However
1 Not everyone here has common sense (apparently)
2. A certain segment of the population feels compelled to spend my taxes on their special interest groups
3. Another segment views taxes are their ticket to a soft life and financial well being
4. Very few think further down the road than their next paycheque

If other want to direct money to teachers they are free to write them a cheque, but you do not speak for the majority, so do not expect your fools idea to fly

It is best for everyone to be respectful of how taxes are spent as the very worst sin is wasting them
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,879
241
63
inaccuracies that's rich..... they were misconceptions. You didn't research and make mistakes you just didn't know and shot off your mouth. And now you are brushing it off as inaccuracies.
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,879
241
63
Back to the original topic of the extracurriculars.

If the pay freeze happens that's a loss of 4.5K gross to any teacher not maxed out.

I think all teachers are going to be hit with a few unpaid days on top of that.

So if you were coaching for free you might be upset that you just lost more than 4.5K.

Also, while the kids are upset it's probably better to stop before the union makes it mandatory and you have kids who have invested money into an activity that won't ruun anymore.

Not saying this is right. It sucks but it's their (teachers) only play.

Too bad the economy dictates how we treat the environment and labour laws..... airline workers were ordered back to work, teachers are experiencing something similar, all civil servants will follow, along with any private unions, pretty soon everyone's going to be at the mercy of their boss.

Good luck to everyone.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
The untouchables

Too bad the economy dictates how we treat union labour laws..... airline workers were ordered back to work, teachers are experiencing something similar, all civil servants will follow, along with any private unions, pretty soon everyone's going to be at the mercy of their boss.

Good luck to everyone.
DUDE,...Why the hell shouldn't the economy effect unions,...it does the majority of the working public.

pretty soon everyone's going to be at the mercy of their boss
.
Again,...that is how the majority of the working public have always had it.

FAST
 

Bachus

New member
Oct 2, 2005
75
0
0
in order to pay for a partial grid increase over the next 2 years all teachers will be given 3 unpaid PD days which is actually a 1.5% wage cut. this was agreed to because the members felt that a total grid freeze was very unfair to newer teachers. We managed to bargain the government down to just being unfair on this issue. Yes this is 3 fewer days that your students will receive direct instruction but the government seems to be fine with this.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Still more money

in order to pay for a partial grid increase over the next 2 years all teachers will be given 3 unpaid PD days which is actually a 1.5% wage cut. this was agreed to because the members felt that a total grid freeze was very unfair to newer teachers. We managed to bargain the government down to just being unfair on this issue. Yes this is 3 fewer days that your students will receive direct instruction but the government seems to be fine with this.
So again,...the teachers are putting them selves ahead of the students for MORE money.

Also,...does "3 unpaid PD days" mean that the students will be in the class room 3 days less per "year" ??

FAST
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,640
3,203
113
inaccuracies that's rich..... they were misconceptions. You didn't research and make mistakes you just didn't know and shot off your mouth. And now you are brushing it off as inaccuracies.
Relative to misrepresenting yourself and blatantly lying about your first hand knowledge, yes they are

Frank
Can I be Frank with you and speak Frankly to you ?
Oops, sorry, pretending to be someone else is your deal

Anyways the point is you mess up by representing yourself as someone else
That lie pretty much negates your credibility, so be careful who you criticize

Back to the matter at hand
There are three indisputable numbers this whole thing revolves around
1. $83K per year
2. 2 1/2 months of vacation
3. $46.5 K for the average taxpayer in Ontario who puts in closer to 48-49 weeks of work and who is funding the teachers bloated compensation


These numbers do not equate
Add in a province running a deficit, growing debt, a host of very expensive benefits and a projection for huge Health Care expense in the near future and we have a financial mess.

You can try and split hairs and point out multiple stats (which you have), trying to justify an unsupportable position
But in the end it all revolves around those three numbers and the increasing debt

If you can not see this , then you are in DA Nile (and thats not the river in Egypt)
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,879
241
63
DUDE,...Why the hell shouldn't the economy effect unions,...it does the majority of the working public.

.
Again,...that is how the majority of the working public have always had it.

FAST
My point was that the interests of big corporations is taking precedence over things like environment and labour laws.

And the other point was that my fear is that labour laws will continue to be chipped away at (from their current state)
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Outdated

My point was that the interests of big corporations is taking precedence over things like environment and labour laws.

And the other point was that my fear is that labour laws will continue to be chipped away at (from their current state)

Actually you have hit on a on going issue with the union/left,...the term "labour laws",...the laws that unions, the left and NDP keep bringing up are specific to unions and should be labelled as such.

Everybody who works, provides Labour in one form or another.

The left continues to use the term as an all encompassing law that insinuates it applies to all "workers",... totally incorrect !!!!

The "laws" in question should/must be stated as "union labour laws",...which have absolutely NOTHING to do with the majority of employees regardless of what their profession is.

If the media, obviously not the TO STAR, where to use the correct term, “union labour laws",…the pinkos would NOT look so appealing to the less informed,… IE… the people who vote for the NDP, and don‘t belong to a union.

FAST
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,879
241
63
Actually you have hit on a on going issue with the union/left,...the term "labour laws",...the laws that unions, the left and NDP keep bringing up are specific to unions and should be labelled as such.

Everybody who works, provides Labour in one form or another.

The left continues to use the term as an all encompassing law that insinuates it applies to all "workers",... totally incorrect !!!!

The "laws" in question should/must be stated as "union labour laws",...which have absolutely NOTHING to do with the majority of employees regardless of what their profession is.

If the media, obviously not the TO STAR, where to use the correct term, “union labour laws",…the pinkos would NOT look so appealing to the less informed,… IE… the people who vote for the NDP, and don‘t belong to a union.

FAST
Good point. I'm just using the common vernacular (spelling?).
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts