Israel at war

[shack]

Nah, pretty much every religious wacko from every religion thinks they are the chosen people. How else you gonna talk people into that ponzi scheme of jehova's witnesses needing sales to buy one of the limited thousands of seats in the afterlife?Nope, I have never said that.Not once.

I don't know if you said it but that is certainly what you wrote. You screwed yourself because your rhetoric is so radical and hate-filled it oozes out of your pores.You can't control yourself

hasbara troll lie that you repeat. Its a lie. Stop it. Its

Temper, temper, dear.

a genocide, not a war. The ICJ ruling states that Israel is the occupying power and you cannot declare war against people you are already occupying. The UN has also repeatedly stated its a genocide. So stop the lying. Stick to the legal definitions and internationally recognized views.No, I was making a sarcastic comment on how totally fucked up religious extremists are and you just proved you are a religious extremist by taking it as fact and instantly deciding that any reference to 'lesser humans' must be the people you are backing exterminating.Nope, we've been over this repeatedly. I didn't refer to either zionists or Palestinians in that comment, just religious extremists who think they are the 'chosen people'. Being a religious extremist you just instantly jumped in and though it only applies to you, as all religious extremists don't recognize that all other religious extremists also think they are the 'chosen people'.No, I made no reference to Palestinians. There is no such thing as 'Gazans', they are Palestinians, by the way.It took decades to end South African apartheid.
We are there now with zionism, it will end soon.
zionists are hated globally and recognized as racial supremacists committing genocide, a description they share with nazis.Idiotic lack of reasoning, Shazi. Netanayahu is the one stopping the return of the hostages, as you well know. That is why there are mass protests today against him in Israel. Ceasefire is the only way to get the hostages back and end the killing, on both sides, not to mention abiding by UNSC resolutions and the ICJ rulings.
Hate speech, Shazi.
You sound a nazi describing Jews in 1945.
Cut it out.

Sure. Just stop lying first.
You just wasted a lot of time and bandwidth because you can't change the fact that you called Gazans lesser humans. Let's strike up the band once again for another rendition:

slaughtering lesser humans is part of their path of righteousness.

 

[shack]

Shazi…

What does Shazi mean? What does Ziontology mean? Answer those and I'll address the rest of your post.

 

[Frankfooter]

I don't know if you said it but that is certainly what you wrote. You screwed yourself because your rhetoric is so radical and hate-filled it oozes out of your pores.You can't control yourself Temper, temper, dear.

I was replying to this:

Is there a revenge loophole or something? Maybe an appropriate scripture quotation? ...

With this sarcastic reply:

I think there is an exception for all chosen people, they can do no wrong and slaughtering lesser humans is part of their path of righteousness.

Nowhere in that post do I mention Jews or Palestinians.
That is all just your views coming out, Shazi.
All this is doing is proving that what I posted as sarcastic reply accurately reflects your genocidal views.

The problem is that you are a racial supremacist, a religious wacko who immediately thought the 'chosen people' could only apply to you and that by saying 'lesser humans' you thought that could only apply to the Palestinians you are trying to exterminate. You took a sarcastic reply and because you believe it to be true, took it as your own gospel.

Again, your views are exactly the same as Gallant, who will be issued with a warrant for genocide by the ICC very soon.
You may prefer 'lesser humans' but you also argue like you think you are fighting 'human animals' as Gallant states.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1814372884053176730

 

[shack]

Shazi…..you should be on your hands and knees begging forgiveness from Frankfooter. The ICJ confirmed every assertion he made regarding POS Nations conduct. You, squealed like a little pig that he was wrong and it would never happen. It did and in spades.

Apologize to him. Maybe you will finally regain some dignity.

Heck, I'll address it now because this is low hanging fruit and you need to apologize to me.

I did not comment one way or the other on the substance of what the ICJ said, other than to say the ruling is toothless.

What I have been going on about, and with complete validity, is that Geno is being cowardly and hypocritical by not commenting on the HRW report of a few days ago, wherein they ruled unequivocally that Hamas committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and atrocities including sexual abuse during the attack of Oct.7. If he wants us to accept every HRW ruling, he must accept this specific ruling at face value and exclusive of any other rulings.

I am not being unreasonable. It is a perfectly logical request in light of how this amicable exchange of ideas has progressed. This one missing statement by Geno, leaves an enormous gap in the breadth and scope of our discussion.

Unlike Geno's debating tactics, I did not resort to telling you to STFU. I hope you appreciate my scholarly and gentlemanly approach.

And I'm still waiting for your definitions of Ziontologist and Shazi. If you are unable, you can just simply say that that is the case.

 

[Frankfooter]

Heck, I'll address it now because this is low hanging fruit and you need to apologize to me.

I did not comment one way or the other on the substance of what the ICJ said, other than to say the ruling is toothless.

What I have been going on about, and with complete validity, is that Geno is being cowardly and hypocritical by not commenting on the HRW report of a few days ago, wherein they ruled unequivocally that Hamas committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and atrocities including sexual abuse during the attack of Oct.7. If he wants us to accept every HRW ruling, he must accept this specific ruling at face value and exclusive of any other rulings.

I am not being unreasonable. It is a perfectly logical request in light of how this amicable exchange of ideas has progressed. This one missing statement by Geno, leaves an enormous gap in the breadth and scope of our discussion.

Unlike Geno's debating tactics, I did not resort to telling you to STFU. I hope you appreciate my scholarly and gentlemanly approach.

And I'm still waiting for your definitions of Ziontologist and Shazi. If you are unable, you can just simply say that that is the case.

I replied directly to your HRW post multiple time, Shazi.
This was the latest reply.

You refuse to reply to my question.
Do you really believe that you are the 'chosen people' and that you have a right to exterminate and steal the land of people Gallant calls 'human animals'?
Every post by you in this nearly 1000 page long thread backs up this statement, Shazi.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1814658375155605690

 

[shack]

I was replying to this:

With this sarcastic reply:


Nowhere in that post do I mention Jews or Palestinians.
That is all just your views coming out, Shazi.
All this is doing is proving that what I posted as sarcastic reply accurately reflects your genocidal views.

The problem is that you are a racial supremacist, a religious wacko who immediately thought the 'chosen people' could only apply to you and that by saying 'lesser humans' you thought that could only apply to the Palestinians you are trying to exterminate. You took a sarcastic reply and because you believe it to be true, took it as your own gospel.

Again, your views are exactly the same as Gallant, who will be issued with a warrant for genocide by the ICC very soon.
You may prefer 'lesser humans' but you also argue like you think you are fighting 'human animals' as Gallant states.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1814372884053176730

Squirm some more. As you continue to mock me and claim how much more internet savvy you are than I, you, of all people, should know that sarcasm rarely is captured well by the written word.

As such you would not be so stupid to say something sarcastically. You would make sure that your words could not be misinterpreted. Therefor, I cannot accept that you attempted to use sarcasm here. You flatly called Gazans "lesser humans". You said it and you need to own it.

Or maybe you are prepared to tell us that you really are stupid. Those are the only 2 options I can see.

 

[Frankfooter]

Squirm some more. As you continue to mock me and claim how much more internet savvy you are than I, you, of all people, should know that sarcasm rarely is captured well by the written word.

As such you would not be so stupid to say something sarcastically. You would make sure that your words could not be misinterpreted. Therefor, I cannot accept that you attempted to use sarcasm here. You flatly called Gazans "lesser humans". You said it and you need to own it.

Or maybe you are prepared to tell us that you really are stupid. Those are the only 2 options I can see.

No, Shazi.
Nowhere in this exchange is there a mention of zionists or Palestinians.
That is entirely your own racist filter.

Is there a revenge loophole or something? Maybe an appropriate scripture quotation? ...

I think there is an exception for all chosen people, they can do no wrong and slaughtering lesser humans is part of their path of righteousness.

 

[shack]

I replied directly to your HRW post multiple time, Shazi.
This was the latest reply.

You refuse to reply to my question.
Do you really believe that you are the 'chosen people' and that you have a right to exterminate and steal the land of people Gallant calls 'human animals'?
Every post by you in this nearly 1000 page long thread backs up this statement, Shazi.

1)That link didn't work. Is it your early onset dementia again?
2)You need to specifically say, and without including anything else. that you agree with and accept at face value the HRW report of 4 days ago saying that Hamas committed war crimes and crimes against humanity including atrocities of a sexual nature on the Oct.7 attack on Israel. You have staunchly refused to do that.

Here is their statement of July 17. Do you agree with this statement of that date in and of itself, excluding any previous statements of theirs. Including any previous statements by HWR, negates your response. This is hardly a difficult request for a man of your intellect and integrity. (BTW, that is how one uses sarcasm without fucking themselves over. Your welcome. LOLOLOLOLOL.)
October 7 Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes by Hamas-led Groups | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)

 

[Klatuu]

Heck, I'll address it now because this is low hanging fruit and you need to apologize to me.

I did not comment one way or the other on the substance of what the ICJ said, other than to say the ruling is toothless.

What I have been going on about, and with complete validity, is that Geno is being cowardly and hypocritical by not commenting on the HRW report of a few days ago, wherein they ruled unequivocally that Hamas committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and atrocities including sexual abuse during the attack of Oct.7. If he wants us to accept every HRW ruling, he must accept this specific ruling at face value and exclusive of any other rulings.

I am not being unreasonable. It is a perfectly logical request in light of how this amicable exchange of ideas has progressed. This one missing statement by Geno, leaves an enormous gap in the breadth and scope of our discussion.

Unlike Geno's debating tactics, I did not resort to telling you to STFU. I hope you appreciate my scholarly and gentlemanly approach.

And I'm still waiting for your definitions of Ziontologist and Shazi. If you are unable, you can just simply say that that is the case.

More grubby pig squealing.

 

[Klatuu]

1)That link didn't work. Is it your early onset dementia again?
2)You need to specifically say, and without including anything else. that you agree with and accept at face value the HRW report of 4 days ago saying that Hamas committed war crimes and crimes against humanity including atrocities of a sexual nature on the Oct.7 attack on Israel. You have staunchly refused to do that.

Here is their statement of July 17. Do you agree with this statement of that date in and of itself, excluding any previous statements of theirs. Including any previous statements by HWR, negates your response. This is hardly a difficult request for a man of your intellect and integrity. (BTW, that is how one uses sarcasm without fucking themselves over. Your welcome. LOLOLOLOLOL.)
October 7 Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes by Hamas-led Groups | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)

No, it’s your dementia. The link works. FFS you are hopeless and a time waster.

 

[shack]

No, Shazi.
Nowhere in this exchange is there a mention of zionists or Palestinians.
That is entirely your own racist filter.

Own your words, Geno.

Frankfooter said:
slaughtering lesser humans is part of their path of righteousness. (That is you referencing Israelis and Gazans. In black and white.)

You sound just like trump when he tried telling us that when he suggested using bleach or internal light beams to cure Covid was a joke. Did you believe him when he said that? I didn't think you did, either.

In just one day you've mimicked both trump's and Hitler's tactics when they're caught lying. You must be so proud of yourself. Our self-proclaimed White Knight of TERB.

 

[shack]

More grubby pig squealing.

No intelligible response from you, eh Porky? You are consistent.

Why don't you use your words to show how wrong I am, instead?

 

[Frankfooter]

1)That link didn't work. Is it your early onset dementia again?
2)You need to specifically say, and without including anything else. that you agree with and accept at face value the HRW report of 4 days ago saying that Hamas committed war crimes and crimes against humanity including atrocities of a sexual nature on the Oct.7 attack on Israel. You have staunchly refused to do that.

Here is their statement of July 17. Do you agree with this statement of that date in and of itself, excluding any previous statements of theirs. Including any previous statements by HWR, negates your response. This is hardly a difficult request for a man of your intellect and integrity. (BTW, that is how one uses sarcasm without fucking themselves over. Your welcome. LOLOLOLOLOL.)
October 7 Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes by Hamas-led Groups | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)

OMG!
You still can't make links work.
Well, at least your DOS system was too old to get hit by crowdstrike.

I don't need to say anything to you, Shazi.
If you back the HRW then you are admitting Israel is apartheid and committing genocide.

Its still amazingly stupid that you think you can cherry pick this one HRW report when those reports are just used as fodder for the ICC and ICJ and we know who is facing charges from them. Hint, its not Hamas.

Take that HRW report to the ICC and ICJ, as other reports have been taken.
See if you can get them to issue findings and warrants, as they are doing.

 

[Frankfooter]

Own your words, Geno.

Frankfooter said:
slaughtering lesser humans is part of their path of righteousness. (That is you referencing Israelis and Gazans. In black and white.)

You sound just like trump when he tried telling us that when he suggested using bleach or internal light beams to cure Covid was a joke. Did you believe him when he said that? I didn't think you did, either.

In just one day you've mimicked both trump's and Hitler's tactics when they're caught lying. You must be so proud of yourself. Our self-proclaimed White Knight of TERB.

Wow, you really aren't very bright at all, Shazi.
Its one thing to be so incredibly hateful and racist that you back starving children to death and bombing them and their families.
Its another to post endlessly on this board and still not understand how links and quotes work.
Its another thing to be so incredibly stupid that you keep using a quote that only shows your own racism.
I didn't name Palestinians or zionists, Shazi, that's just your hate that went there.

All you're doing is proving that you are as racist and bright as Gallant, who the ICC is coming for very soon.

Israel-Palestine war: 'We are fighting human animals', Israeli defence minister says

Yoav Gallant to deny Gaza access to 'electricity, food, fuel'

www.middleeasteye.net

ICC to issue warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant ’within two weeks’

A report by Israel’s Channel 14 cited unnamed Israeli officials who said it was ’highly probable’ the warrants would be issued within a fortnight.

www.newarab.com

 

[Butler1000]

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/israel-strike-yemen-drone-attack-response-1.7270396

Looks like a certain drone strike wasn't worth it after all.

 

[Klatuu]

All the result of grubby Ziontology.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1814837800023314448

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Its 6:30am and Klatuu is already up posting his anti-Israel bullshit

 

[shack]

I don't need to say anything to you, Shazi.

Meaning that you are too cowardly to acknowledge the fact that HEW condemned Hamas of war crimes. Everybody has seen it and also how you pretend it doesn't exist. Feel free to live in your own fantasy land.
If you back the HRW then you are admitting Israel is apartheid and committing genocide.[/QUOTE]If you agree with HRW you admit that Hamas committed war crimes and crimes against humanity on Oct.7.
October 7 Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes by Hamas-led Groups | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)

Its still amazingly stupid that you think you can cherry pick this one HRW report when those reports are just used as fodder for the ICC and ICJ and we know who is facing charges from them. Hint, its not Hamas.
[/QUOTE]
It is stupid and juvenile for you to think that you can pretend that the HRW report of July 17 doesn't exist. You refuse to acknowledge it. You cover your ears and shout lalalala.
This what you look like to the rest of the board. A little child.



October 7 Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes by Hamas-led Groups | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)

 

[shack]

Let me remind you fragrance.
October 7 Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes by Hamas-led Groups | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)

Thanks Geno

 

[Klatuu]

Meaning that you are too cowardly to acknowledge the fact that HEW condemned Hamas of war crimes. Everybody has seen it and also how you pretend it doesn't exist. Feel free to live in your own fantasy land.
If you back the HRW then you are admitting Israel is apartheid and committing genocide.

If you agree with HRW you admit that Hamas committed war crimes and crimes against humanity on Oct.7.
October 7 Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes by Hamas-led Groups | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)

Its still amazingly stupid that you think you can cherry pick this one HRW report when those reports are just used as fodder for the ICC and ICJ and we know who is facing charges from them. Hint, its not Hamas.
[/QUOTE]
It is stupid and juvenile for you to think that you can pretend that the HRW report of July 17 doesn't exist. You refuse to acknowledge it. You cover your ears and shout lalalala.
This what you look like to the rest of the board. A little child.
View attachment 344293


October 7 Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes by Hamas-led Groups | Human Rights Watch (hrw.org)
[/QUOTE]

Shazi….cognitive decline is apparent. According to you, Frankfooter has already done what you asked. Another one of your fiascos.

I also like your admission that POS Nation is an apartheid state in your post at the top. In bold. What a JA you are.

Guaranteed that we'll hear from Geno condemning this strike. He repeatedly tells us we must listen to what the UN says. He supports law and order and condemns terrorism. He even did so today while praising the ruling of the ICJ and agreeing with the HRW's latest ruling that on Oct.7 Hamas was guilty of war crimes, crimes against humanity and acts of atrocity which most likely included rape and mutilation.