I trust what the Lancet says and they said absolutely NOTHING regarding that (faulty) study. It was a letter to the editor and they did not review, vouch or even comment on it.The Lancet is trustworthy, you aren't.
I trust what the Lancet says and they said absolutely NOTHING regarding that (faulty) study. It was a letter to the editor and they did not review, vouch or even comment on it.The Lancet is trustworthy, you aren't.
Repeat with Mandy, all as one, as good little boys, 1, 2 ,3:Why would I agree with you, Danny?
Israel has a right to self defence. If the only way it can defend itself involves warfare in built-up areas, it has the right to do that and defend its own population.
Danny, when the Nazi army entrenched itself in Berlin in 1945 and dared the Soviets to come and attack it, should your commie buddies have said "Can't do that. We'll kill German civilians?"
Deranged.Repeat with Mandy, all as one, as good little boys, 1, 2 ,3:
"Israel has a right to self defense."
Not legally.Israel has a right to self defence.
Your fantasy is the zionist fantasy that zionists have rights to all of Palestine, Smotrich.I claimed that Israel had not annexed the West Bank or Gaza until the 6 Day War occurred.
How is that fantasy?
Wiki:
The West Bank, including East Jerusalem, has been under military occupation by Israel since 7 June 1967, when Israeli forces captured the territory, then ruled by Jordan, during the Six-Day War.[a]
Good story.Not legally.
Israel is the occupying power and does not have the right to self defence against the people they occupy. The right to self defence only applies to countries.
Hamas and Palestinians have the legal right to self defence against what the ICJ has ruled is an illegal occupation.
Pitiful ZiontologistGood story.
BTW, Hamas and Palestine are not countries and as such have no legal right to self defence.
Palestine is recognized as a country, Gvir.Good story.
BTW, Hamas and Palestine are not countries and as such have no legal right to self defence.
Another nice story, Geno.Palestine is recognized as a country, Gvir.
Also, Germans lost quite a bit of territory as a result of ww2.Danny, when the Nazi army entrenched itself in Berlin in 1945 and dared the Soviets to come and attack it, should your commie buddies have said "Can't do that. We'll kill German civilians?"
I disagree about genocide and have no clue where you get the ridiculous 180,000 number from as even hamas' ministry of health say around 40 with some percentage being combattants....
The problem with your argument is that Israel is practicing ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinians (180,000 perished so far)...
Are you a 2005 chat bot or simply incapable of justifying any of your claims?Deflection
Ah, the moronic arguments. Are you now claiming Palestinians aren't Arabs?Your racism is showing again.
They are 'Palestinians'.
You're also arguing that Palestine shouldn't have the same rights as Israel to decide who gets to be a citizen, that you think only Israel can decide that for Palestinians. Very colonial of you. Not only are you backing apartheid, genocide and settler colonialism now you're flouting the ICJ ruling and declaring that you don't support the two state solution at all anymore.
All you want is apartheid Israel and more genocide.
I guess you never read the document....
Now the ICJ says its time to give it up and return it to Palestinians.
...
Lets see. Jordan's army was supplied by British war surplus and led by British officers. Egypt was also equipped with British WWII equipment including more than 100 tanks and light tanks....
So you're saying that the Arab leaders were unprepared? We both agree that they've been poor leaders. One bad decision after another. Repercussions.
...
The Lancet posted a study that applied standard battlefield math to counted dead and said that its likely Israel has killed over 186,000 Palestinians.I disagree about genocide and have no clue where you get the ridiculous 180,000 number from as even hamas' ministry of health say around 40 with some percentage being combattants.
I don't like the amount of civilian death. I also don't like that there is no conceivable way to prevent Hamas from continuing their attempts at genocidal/ethnic cleansing beyond hoping that one day Palestinians reject them and their extremism. Despite what Frank says, there is no route towards peace that doesn't require both Palestinians and Israelis to accept the existence of the other.
If you truly believed in peace and opposed ethnic violence, you would include criticism of Hamas in your statements. Before the 7th, conditions in Gaza were improving with increased aid, fewer border restrictions, increased trade and increased employment in or in conjunction with Israel. Hamas saw that and the improving relations between Israel and Arab states and realized that neither serve their interest and put their plan in action, knowing Israel would react harshly and the people would celebrate Hamas again.
p.s. Frank has never defended hamas' right to commit racist violence.
Frank doesn't think Arabs are capable of making decisions or being accountable.What? You mean that the Arab leaders accepted the land offer in 1948?
So you're saying that the Arab leaders were unprepared? We both agree that they've been poor leaders. One bad decision after another. Repercussions.
...
No, the ICJ ruling on the settlements said the settlements are illegal and must be returned to Palestinians and restitution paid.I guess you never read the document.
The UN says Palestinians and Israelis need to negotiate a peace and it should be a two state peace based on the Green Line.