MojoRisin' said:
Toronto players also get put on a pedistal and are looked at as more than they are as well at times.
too wordy for me. my IQ can't decipher what that means...
your list shows alot of great coaches, but some have little experience coaching struggling teams. Quinn's been through it all.
Crawford - always has a strong team to coach
Ruff - Ted Nolan is probably better than this guy (brought a team from dead last to winning NE division title)
Sutter - he's apparently a good 'mind-fucker'... probably will be a great coach
Hitchcock - the most experienced one of the bunch
Renny - i can't say he's ever lifted a poorly performing team.
Lamerillo - probably a better manager... excellent either way.. one of the best for sure.
Tippett - very smart offensive minded coach, but little nhl experience and never had to coach a team that wasn't going to make playoffs.
Sutter - did we do him already?... or do you mean the other Sutter... he's not current, is he?
Babcock - great coach.
Trotz - give him a struggling team and he aint going anywhere with it.
personally, i think Quinn can coach with any of these guys... but, he may need managing position as well to have total control... I'd agree that Hitchcock, Lamerillo, and Babcock may be comparable... the others i am not so sure about. don't get me wrong... Quinn isn't THEE BEST... he is one of the top coaches available though...
just my opinion. let's face it. Quinn is getting old and we definitely have to look towards a replacement... is Paul Maurice it? i don't think he'll do the job. but, I have been wrong about Chicago, right?