Ford passed the legislation for ripping up the bike lanes TODAY!!

ramblin

Well-known member
Nov 16, 2019
1,502
3,381
113
So here you go. Bike lanes east and west on College St.

Almost unused. Wide enough for three riders abreast - on EACH side of the street. That's room for 6 bikes at a time. And buffeted with a huge fat curb. That's 2 entire car lanes.

View attachment 373685

View attachment 373686
Still can't go three abreast without exiting the lane. The bike lane is just the ashpalted lane. The gutter isn't the lane, the concrete where people stand after parking, or the city puts sign posts post up isn't the lane. And you'll also note there are right angled curbs in places so you can't get to close to those or else you'll crash out.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,349
4,010
113
Yeah also it’s flat and warm so there this
And Toronto is not Montreal, nor Calgary or Edmonton? Burgs where you don't get the heads exploding histrionics and verbal diarrhea of pampered, coddled and swathed in diapers, motor vehicle drivers who are the culprits, not bike lanes, in congestion and gridlock.

I mean, c'mon get serious with these faulty inequivalences.
 
Last edited:

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,349
4,010
113
These businesses like Cyslists because can easily stop and lock their bike and walk into the business as cars just drive by, they may look for parking but mostly they drive away.
You don't ever here these BIAs railing against bike lanes nor have emergency services ever raised one iota of alarm of increased response times.

There is also an enormous amount of local area consultation, data gathering, months and months of preparation and planning and city council debate and votes involved versus a bribing, conniving, cynical electioneering blowhard employing the lowest of the low car culture war tribalism to gin up up what is really an insignificant non-factor in congestion and gridlock eaten up by low information, low knowledge, road raging, car is king inner and suburban rednecks.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
86,270
130,818
113
And Toronto is not Montreal, nor Calgary or Edmonton? Burgs where you don't get the heads exploding histrionics and verbal diarrhea of pampered, coddled and swathed in diapers, motor vehicle drivers who are the culprits, not bike lanes, in congestion and gridlock.

I mean, c'mon get serious with these faulty inequivalences.
Calgary, Edmonton and Montreal are all a lot smaller and less congested than Toronto. Calgary has a population of 1.5 million. Toronto has a pop of 7M.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
86,270
130,818
113
Still can't go three abreast without exiting the lane. The bike lane is just the ashpalted lane. The gutter isn't the lane, the concrete where people stand after parking, or the city puts sign posts post up isn't the lane. And you'll also note there are right angled curbs in places so you can't get to close to those or else you'll crash out.
Okay, 2 abreast with a massive amount of room between each rider.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
86,270
130,818
113
Where the frick is this bike lane induced congestion on College St. West that you incessantly cry you about?

Show me the bike lane caused congestion on College St. West?

I don't see the congestion; do you see it?

Where is the congestion?
The photos were taken on a Sunday afternoon..... :rolleyes:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Frankfooter

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
86,270
130,818
113
1) Bike lanes are insignificant, especially Toronto's. And all of this nonsense about Europe being different than Toronto when other large Canadian cities such as Montreal and get this Calgary and Edmonton have more extensive bike lanes yet you don't hear the car hog whiners and crybabies over in those cities raise a royal stink about really nothing at all because cars, cars, cars are the culprits in congestion and gridlock.

2) You really are a clueless, misinformed sort regarding City of Toronto council, issues, votes etc. City Hall did not want to tear down the Gardiner. Majority right-wing city councilors along with the right-wing mayor, John Tory voted to spend billions over a decade to send the Gardiner for reconstructive surgery and facelift it's eastern arc to the DVP a few inches to the north. Nip, tuck, Snip, snap. All of which has led directly to the traffic gridlock and congestion on the Gardiner, ingress into egress out of and surrounding area mayhem. This, my dear crybaby single occupancy vehicle driver fucks, not fuckin bike lanes, is causing congestion. You wanted it, you got it!
The GE was crumbling and needed to be fixed up or it would start collapsing. And city council suggested it should be torn down instead.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,349
4,010
113
Calgary, Edmonton and Montreal are all a lot smaller and less congested than Toronto. Calgary has a population of 1.5 million. Toronto has a pop of 7M.
The City of Toronto's population, 2.8 million reisdents, is 60% less than you believe it to be.

The City Montreal is a major urbanized city of 1.8 residents with the greater Montreal area contains 4.4 million residents.

Calgary and Edmonton are not rural hamlets.

All these cities basically have the same type of environments, urbanization and suburbanization.

The difference is that drivers in Montreal, Calgary and Edmonton are not widdle, gurly men, prone to histrionics, bedwetting and diaper soiling like those in Toronto when encountering an insignificant bike lane off to side of road.
 
Last edited:

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,349
4,010
113
The photos were taken on a Sunday afternoon..... :rolleyes:
Your God given right of a congestion free or Sunday driver's excursion during am and pm weekday rush commuting hours is a rust bucket relic of time long, long past.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,349
4,010
113
The GE was crumbling and needed to be fixed up or it would start collapsing. And city council suggested it should be torn down instead.
A suggestion by some on council, definitely not the majority, that it be torn down and replaced with an expanded lakeside boulevard and rapid transit was one of 3 proposals put forward.

Options, varying proposals and plans being put forward for the rigors of professional examination and subsequent reports thereof being made available to decision makes is the hallmark of good governance.

Suggestions, varying proposals and plans that were tabled, voted on and enacted by city of Toronto council and not Doug Fraud.

You can't understand city of Toronto council and city of Toronto issues if you are always cocooned in a casket of metal, glass, plastic and rubber while squealing like a stuck pig alongside thousands of other single casket occupants on the paved tar pits of the Gardiner, DVP, arterial, secondary roads.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
86,270
130,818
113
A suggestion by some on council, definitely not the majority, that it be torn down and replaced with an expanded lakeside boulevard and rapid transit was one of 3 proposals put forward.

Options, varying proposals and plans being put forward for the rigors of professional examination and subsequent reports thereof being made available to decision makes is the hallmark of good governance.

Suggestion, varying proposals and plans that were tabled and voted and enacted by city of Toronto council and not Doug Fraud.
The fact that ANYONE suggested that a major artery be torn down is astonishing in its idiocy.

Bet you supported the Gardiner being destroyed. Just your sort of exploit!
You can't understand city of Toronto council and city of Toronto issues if you are always cocooned in a casket of metal, glass, plastic and rubber while squealing like a stuck pig alongside thousands of other single casket occupants on the paved tar pits of the Gardiner, DVP, arterial, secondary roads.
Nah. I live in Little Portugal and usually walk to court at University and Dundas. I enjoy the scenery as I walk past......

I just have a few IQ points that tell me that the cars aren't going away - because 90% of the GTA is suburbs with shitty transit links.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
86,270
130,818
113
The City of Toronto's population, 2.8 million reisdents, is 60% less than you believe it to be.
Nah. GTA's about 7 million. You include Peel, York Region and Durham. That's where the cars live.
The City Montreal is a major urbanized city of 1.8 residents with the greater Montreal area contains 4.4 million residents.

Calgary and Edmonton are not rural hamlets.

All these cities basically have the same type of environments, urbanization and suburbanization.

The difference is that drivers in Montreal, Calgary and Edmonton are not widdle, gurly men, prone to histrionics, bedwetting and diaper soiling like those in Toronto when encountering an insignificant bike lane off to side of road.
Compared to Toronto, they're quite small.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,349
4,010
113
Nah. I live in Little Portugal and usually walk to court at University and Dundas. I enjoy the scenery as I walk past......

I just have a few IQ points that tell me that the cars aren't going away - because 90% of the GTA is suburbs with shitty transit links.
Your 'commuting folktale yarns from hell' keep changing as often as Trump has his soiled diapers changed.

First it was all, "Oh they made my commute south to the Gardiner a living hell because they put a bike lane on Palmerston or Augusta or whatever the fuck that street it was. So now my work commute to York Region Court in Newmarket is even more fucked up than it always has been! Woe is me."

Then it was, "I take the streetcar to the new monster courthouse on University Ave and it's all fucked up because of bike lanes."

Then it became, "The bike lanes are making my College St., streetcar commute to work/buy milk/get my shoes cobbled a visage out of Dante's inferno!"

To now, your quoted gem above about walking, joyously walking and skipping to work stopping to sing hello, hello, hello to all the little birdies, chipmunks and puppy dogs along the way.

You walking? Hah, that's rich!
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,347
10,370
113
That's just a lame excuse. If you build it they will come.
Warm weather will come? Also, anyone can take small streets and bike lanes are not even necessary. Just allow bikes going against the traffic on all one way streets (or even turn a blind eye as they pretty much already do now) and it’ll be safer than a damn bike lane with its zooming couriers and slow ass families with kids and all kinds of rookies
 
  • Like
Reactions: roddermac

roddermac

Well-known member
Sep 17, 2023
2,074
1,621
113
The fact that ANYONE suggested that a major artery be torn down is astonishing in its idiocy.

Bet you supported the Gardiner being destroyed. Just your sort of exploit!

Nah. I live in Little Portugal and usually walk to court at University and Dundas. I enjoy the scenery as I walk past......

I just have a few IQ points that tell me that the cars aren't going away - because 90% of the GTA is suburbs with shitty transit links.
Seriously. Since when did you become a conservative with common sense. As for the Gardiner. I support it being underground as some in the past have suggested.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts