Exactly, the brothers do not like white men since they think the system's rigged against them even though all you need to do is get a real job and behave.
Do you believe in privilege? White privilege, etc?
- Thread starter Jenesis
- Start date
This is flat wrong. Babies prefer white dolls before any cultural indoctrination. Love of blue eyes has been genetic for thousands of years. White being a mass world wide minority is weird and bizare and it attracts. A small faction of the world population is "white" the majority of course are Asian. Its should be noted some countreis charge 1000% or more white tax to go to tourists to go do local attractions. Actual systemtic racism is the norm for non western countries to varying degrees. Immigration rates are lower than 1% in many - a sign that there not welcoming in the least. Tialand, prolby one of the most welcoming countries has strick controls of evening living and working there, thought it you have money that can be overcome.
If history is accurate, they did enter many of those countries, were treated well, and then took over the countries, while depleting the resources for their ‘common wealth’ hence the language .If a caucasian person moved to India, or China, Nigeria, or any country where the indigenous population isn't white....would anyone over there be trying to ignite a Leftist social justice movement counteracting brown or asian privilege?
No, because this is purely a Western idea, much like many of the Leftist social ideologies.
No One Cares.
Work Harder.
Stop Crying
Take a look at it from Canada’s indigenous people’s perspective, if you prefer something closer to home.
One can cherry pick a certain comment or communique and base their beliefs on it.
Not so simple, except for the simple minded.
Here is an example of a survey carried out on people of colour, both sexes some years ago, in the US
The summary was the following:
The coloured females who indicated that they preferred having children with whites, said, it was so because they did not want their children to be killed for being black.
As we all know, mothers will do anything to ensure their children have a good chance of living a good life.
That is only one example, as decisions made in life is not simple, for many, or as we say things are not always just black or white, there are many shades.
More PPS - Trumper's and White Privilege believers are playing the same game, just different uniforms.
Do you have any evidence to support this claim?
Where did you get this piece of fiction writing from because it sure makes no effort to respond to the claims I made in my post.
How so? Are you of the far right opinion that recognizing reality is dangerous?
Do you spew this racist drivel because you think minorities are incapable of rational thought or is it simply you like to make implied threats on why you see immigration as dangerous?
Google?
first result though the majority interpolations are racial theory and the doll test (famous in law philosophy and psychology)
blue eyes less so
The earliest recorded mention of blue eyes being considered beautiful is found in:
- Ancient Mesopotamia: The Sumerian King Shulgi of Ur (2094-2047 BCE) described his own eyes as "blue" and "lapis lazuli-like", indicating a positive association with the color.
- Ancient Egypt: In the Epic of Gilgamesh (circa 2100 BCE), the goddess Ishtar is described as having "lapis lazuli eyes", which were likely blue. This suggests that blue eyes were valued and associated with divine beauty.
- Indus Valley Civilization: The ancient Indus Valley Civilization (3300-1300 BCE) depicted blue-eyed figures in their art, potentially indicating a cultural appreciation for blue eyes.
- Vedic Period in India: In the Rigveda (circa 1500 BCE), the god Indra is described as having "blue eyes", which were considered a symbol of divine power and beauty.
Research on blue eye preference in various regions and cultures has yielded intriguing results:
- Global preference: Studies have shown that people from diverse cultures, including African, Asian, and Indigenous American populations, often associate blue eyes with beauty, trustworthiness, and intelligence.
- European countries: In many European countries, blue eyes are relatively common, and there is no strong preference for blue eyes over other eye colors.
- African countries: In some African countries, like South Africa and Ghana, blue eyes are often associated with beauty and are preferred by some participants.
- Asian countries: In some Asian cultures, like Japan and China, blue eyes are considered exotic and attractive.
- Latin America: In some Latin American countries, like Brazil and Mexico, blue eyes are associated with beauty and are preferred by some participants.
- Evolutionary factors: Blue eyes are relatively rare, making them stand out and potentially more attractive.
- Cultural influence: Media representation, colonial history, and cultural exchange can contribute to the perception of blue eyes as desirable. However this is only recently so its a best an add on feature.
- Social status: In some cultures, blue eyes are associated with wealth, power, or high social status. This status of course is related to the first two, with the rarity being key, and of course some universal like in humanity DNA to like blue eyes or see them as a positive special trait (as opposed to being left handed, also rare, but seen as a negative)
Last edited:
You are either totally ignorant or full of hate, but if the former here a video showing the racial hate that exists
None of the things you are claiming are referenced in the article you just cited.Google?
first result though the majority interpolations are racial theory and the doll test (famous in law philosophy and psychology)
blue eyes less so
The earliest recorded mention of blue eyes being considered beautiful is found in:
These early records suggest that blue eyes were valued and associated with beauty, divine power, and nobility in ancient cultures.
- Ancient Mesopotamia: The Sumerian King Shulgi of Ur (2094-2047 BCE) described his own eyes as "blue" and "lapis lazuli-like", indicating a positive association with the color.
- Ancient Egypt: In the Epic of Gilgamesh (circa 2100 BCE), the goddess Ishtar is described as having "lapis lazuli eyes", which were likely blue. This suggests that blue eyes were valued and associated with divine beauty.
- Indus Valley Civilization: The ancient Indus Valley Civilization (3300-1300 BCE) depicted blue-eyed figures in their art, potentially indicating a cultural appreciation for blue eyes.
- Vedic Period in India: In the Rigveda (circa 1500 BCE), the god Indra is described as having "blue eyes", which were considered a symbol of divine power and beauty.
Research on blue eye preference in various regions and cultures has yielded intriguing results:
The preference for blue eyes may be attributed to various factors, including:
- Global preference: Studies have shown that people from diverse cultures, including African, Asian, and Indigenous American populations, often associate blue eyes with beauty, trustworthiness, and intelligence.
- European countries: In many European countries, blue eyes are relatively common, and there is no strong preference for blue eyes over other eye colors.
- African countries: In some African countries, like South Africa and Ghana, blue eyes are often associated with beauty and are preferred by some participants.
- Asian countries: In some Asian cultures, like Japan and China, blue eyes are considered exotic and attractive.
- Latin America: In some Latin American countries, like Brazil and Mexico, blue eyes are associated with beauty and are preferred by some participants.
- Evolutionary factors: Blue eyes are relatively rare, making them stand out and potentially more attractive.
- Cultural influence: Media representation, colonial history, and cultural exchange can contribute to the perception of blue eyes as desirable. However this is only recently so its a best an add on feature.
- Social status: In some cultures, blue eyes are associated with wealth, power, or high social status. This status of course is related to the first two, with the rarity being key, and of course some universal like in humanity DNA to like blue eyes or see them as a positive special trait (as opposed to being left handed, also rare, but seen as a negative)
Moreover, the article you cited demonstrates that racial segregation had a profoundly negative impact on African American children’s self esteem as it led them to view white dolls as more attractive than black ones. This study was used as evidence by the NAACP in Brown vs Board of Education.
The rest of the stuff you cut and pasted from…ummm…wherever…doesn’t support your argument either. In fact, the last paragraph describes attraction to blue eyes as determined by “evolutionary factors, cultural influence, and social status.”
It is unclear to me whether you are even reading the material you are posting or, if so, if you have some cognitive processing difficulties because everything you post means literally the opposite of what you think it means.
Anyway…I’m done arguing with you about this.
Last edited:
blue eyes preference has proven to exist for 5000 plus years from documenation.None of the things you are claiming are referenced in the article you just cited.
Moreover, the article you cited demonstrates that racial segregation had a profoundly negative impact on African American children’s self esteem as it led them to view white dolls as more attractive than black ones. This study was used as evidence by the NAACP in Brown vs Board of Education.
The rest of the stuff you cut and pasted from…ummm…wherever…doesn’t support your argument either. In fact, the last paragraph describes attraction to blue eyes as determined by “evolutionary factors, cultural influence, and social status.”
It is unclear to me whether you are even reading the material you are posting or, if so, if you have some cognitive processing difficulties because everything you post is literally the opposite of what you think it means.
None of the things you are claiming are referenced in the article you just cited.
Moreover, the article you cited demonstrates that racial segregation had a profoundly negative impact on African American children’s self esteem as it led them to view white dolls as more attractive than black ones. This study was used as evidence by the NAACP in Brown vs Board of Education.
The rest of the stuff you cut and pasted from…ummm…wherever…doesn’t support your argument either. In fact, the last paragraph describes attraction to blue eyes as determined by “evolutionary factors, cultural influence, and social status.”
It is unclear to me whether you are even reading the material you are posting or, if so, if you have some cognitive processing difficulties because everything you post is literally the opposite of what you think it means.
Your being obtuse. Google. But lets see blue eye preference has existed at least for 4,000 years. So
the preference for blue eyes has indeed existed for thousands of years, predating colonialism. Research suggests that:
- Ancient civilizations: Blue eyes were considered desirable in ancient cultures, such as the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans.
- Genetic variation: Blue eyes are a result of genetic variation in the OCA2 and HERC2 genes, which code for eye pigmentation. This variation has been present in European populations for at least 4,000-6,000 years.
- Cultural and social factors: Preferences for blue eyes have been influenced by cultural and social factors, such as associating them with beauty, purity, or nobility, long before colonialism.
The white and blue doll experiment has been used by critical race theory in my opinion in a wrong way, the science center on the lowest level had (has if reopened) a retort to this with the documentation. I am tempted not to do your homework, as its not in good faith but just in case your having a bad day:
Here are some articles and sources that support the argument that fair skin preference predates colonialism:
- "The Cult of the Fair Skin in Ancient China" by Vivian-Lee Nyitray (Journal of Asian Studies, 2001)
- "The Beauty of Whiteness: Indian Perspectives" by Roopali Mukherjee (Journal of Women's History, 2006)
- "Skin Color and Beauty Standards in Ancient Greece and Rome" by Margaret C. Miller (American Journal of Archaeology, 2013)
- "The History of Skin Whitening in Japan" by Kaoru Takahashi (Journal of Japanese Studies, 2015)
- "Fair Skin and Beauty in Ancient India: A Study of the Ayurvedic and Sanskrit Texts" by R. H. Singh (Indian Journal of History of Science, 2017)
- "The Cultural Significance of Fair Skin in Pre-Colonial Africa" by T. O. Beidelman (Africa Today, 1963)
- "Beauty and the Bleach: Skin Lightening and the Politics of Skin Color in Ghana" by A. B. Ncube (African Studies Review, 2018)
P.S. I'm usually a typo-prone, unedited poster, but I'm making an exception here to ensure clarity.
P.S. I use cut and paste to bypass typing challenges whenever I can . I rely on the reader's acuity to connect the dots and understand the intended meaning . In this case, obviously this was too high a hope.
so again
In essence, the argument is that:
- Preferences for blue eyes and fair skin have existed for thousands of years, long before colonialism.
- These preferences have been influenced by a combination of genetic, cultural, and social factors.
- Colonialism may have exploited and amplified existing biases, but did not create them.
- Attributing these preferences solely to racism oversimplifies their complex origins and ignores the role of human culture and psychology.
The provided sources and articles support this argument, offering a nuanced understanding of the historical and cultural context of these preferences.
PPS preference does not indicate racism just as men who prefer women as partners are not sexist.
Last edited:
Yes.
And as I've said before, I saw differences between the way I was treated as a poor white kid and that of my less pale friends.
I'm not the one freaking out at the possibility of non-whites getting a fair shake.
It is sad to see a thread created by our black brothers who are asking each other to list agencies that will see them.
I see no comparable thread about agencies that will see whites.
I understand there is a bit more nuance, but imagine you're a decent, kind person, work hard, take responsibility, and are rejected out of hand simply based upon your look.
I see no comparable thread about agencies that will see whites.
I understand there is a bit more nuance, but imagine you're a decent, kind person, work hard, take responsibility, and are rejected out of hand simply based upon your look.
I believe in white privilege. I see it all the time.
I believe in pretty privilege. I experience it often.
I believe in pretty privilege. I experience it often.
Montreal is filled with "no black gents" SPs Toronto is paradise compared that city
