Canadian Economy - Buoyant

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,399
7,276
113
Agreeing Fuji is hardly something which instills confidence in your decision making
At some point you will disagree with him and then come to realize how untrustworthy and difficult he is
Disagree with me or not, I am always truthful
First learn how to behave like a gentleman. You are acting like you are the innocent one with the back and forth heated discussions with all the members that do not have the same views as you. One day you may grow up. As for Fuji we have disagreed on a few occasions but we do not undergo that endless name calling, as well as condescending attitude that you always seem to come up with. Arrogance does not get you Brownie points however, much you think that you are "truthful". You are lying to yourself.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,440
3,077
113
You still cannot fathom the bs that spews out of your mouth.
That condescending attitude of yours says it all.
What value does that provide?

Insult all you want, but tie it to something tangible


Maybe you do not understand that most Canadians take out a mortgage to invest, yes invest in a house.
The value of the house goes up over a period of time and it is a great investment in the long run.
What do you think that the Government is doing?
???
You have a bad habit of introducing irrelevant and non related topics without tying them to anything I have stated
This makes your arguments confusing to read and disjointed. Again the point of typing out a post is to communicate, not confuse the audience.
Please review your posts with this in mind

Did you think I did not know most Canadians have a mortgage?
Did you think I did not know real estate has been a very good investment for most Canadians?

How this ties to Justin's excessive borrowing is unclear due to your poor communication skills
I can only guess you are implying if the average Canadian can borrow , so too should the government.

The problem with your weak and ill thought out argument is that home owners have to have a plan to pay back the loan. ie. the terms of the mortgage
In addition the lenders will not grant a mortgage if the debt becomes excessive

Governments are immune to these restrictions as they have the ability to raise taxes
If that is Justin's ultimate plan then he should disclose this so Canadians understand what the future for them or their kids holds
The reality is Justin is borrowing and spending because he knows the bill will not come due under his administration.
He will just kick the can down the road and it will be an issue for your kids and grand kids



Harper created huge deficits and you are okay with it, in spite of his denial that there was a recession.
As pointed out before (Do you not pay attention???).
There is a time to borrow and a time for manage costs
2008 was definatly a time to borrow.
What Harper said prior to the recession, well as you say no one is perfect and it did not cost any money
The real point Harper should be evaluated on is he acted when it was required

Justin borrowed when it was not necessary, rather he borrowed to buy the voters. with their future taxes.
I have to give him or his team credit for this as it worked. He won
It however is not a positive thing for Canadians
The economy was sluggish when Trudeau took over,
0.9% GDP growth for 2015 is not great, however it was not a disaster and certainly not a reason to re-inflate the debt it took Canadians decades to get under control (i.e. the debt Justin's father created)

but with this fastest growth rate in a space of a few months, means he HAS NOT just wasted money that some right wing sites try to instill in that head of yours.
1. Get this straight. I do not spend time visiting right wing websites. You pompous ass
2. Ask you kids when they get wacked with higher taxes if Justin's spending was wasteful (do not forget to remind them he paid $10 MM to a murdering terrorist and do not forget to remind them Justin has never has to worry about money his entire life)
3.You really need to view this from a long term perspective. Justin is borrowing with 7, 10 ,15 and 20 year maturities. That is when the bill comes due. Well past when he is no longer PM
4. A couple of quarters of above average growth is great, however it is not sustainable and certainly not worth the Billions he is borrowing
5. If the economy sustains 3.0%+ GDP growth for several years then you have an better case to justify the stimulus. Time will tell, however we are far too dependant on the US and I fear their growth will stall.
6. Did you learn something? or are you too pig headed to take an objective view?

You were predicting how this was going to be doomsday since the Liberals won the election.
The carbon tax and his assault on small business will prove to be very detrimental to the economy

Eat your words and stop coming out with further nonsense now.
Instead how about you take an objective look at this
Think of your kids future

Again your hatred is displayed in your innuendos against Trudeau, by comparing him to ten year olds. He is smarter than you will ever be, but if you think of him as a ten year old, then Harper must be a 5 year old. LOL
.
For the 4th or 5th time I do not hate Justin
I think he is poorly qualified for the job
As for the reference to a ten year old, sadly he still does not understand the responsibilities associated with spending other peoples money, what is even sadder is he likely never will
I am "economic literate" and do not need that brainwashed pompous and extremely stupid advice of yours.
Not having any concern for the debt you kids are going to be burdened with proves other wise

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...surges-4-5-on-consumer-spending-key-takeaways
http://business.financialpost.com/n...owth-higher-than-expected-in-second-quarter-2

The above are two links from more conservative sites. Read and try to take in some facts into that grumpy old head of yours.
At no point have I indicate the current GDP growth is not impressive
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,440
3,077
113
First learn how to behave like a gentleman. You are acting like you are the innocent one with the back and forth heated discussions with all the members that do not have the same views as you. One day you may grow up. As for Fuji we have disagreed on a few occasions but we do not undergo that endless name calling, as well as condescending attitude that you always seem to come up with. Arrogance does not get you Brownie points however, much you think that you are "truthful". You are lying to yourself.
What's the matter?
Did you drop your soother
Grow up

I hope you and Fuji are very happy together
However I would not trust him with the steam off my piss on a cold winters day
 
Last edited:

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
If you wish to remain an economic illiterate suit your self and ignore my wisdom

Most 10 years old children understand if they borrow money they need to have some kind of plan to pay it back
Too bad you hold 10 year olds to a higher standard than your PM

Re the Rebel and the Sun
1. I have never read the Rebel
2. The Sun is suitable for wrapping fish or scoping out the strip clubs

You may do well to read the Globe or the Economist at some point in order to fill in the obvious missing pieces in your economic understanding

Ha Ha
I have forgotten more than you will ever understand
Three times I pointed out factual information about the US economy which was relevant to one of your flawed arguments and three times you did not clue in
All sputter. No content. Your little finger is not content. Your azhheimers is not content.

Are you aware that you have no reasons for the things you say? You endlessly declare what you belong to be true and then when challenged for reasons why it's true you cite your little finger and how much you have forgotten.

Not convincing.

You know nothing about finance and nothing about economics otherwise you'd be able to give reasons.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,440
3,077
113
All sputter. No content. Your little finger is not content. Your azhheimers is not content.

Are you aware that you have no reasons for the things you say? You endlessly declare what you belong to be true and then when challenged for reasons why it's true you cite your little finger and how much you have forgotten.

Not convincing.

You know nothing about finance and nothing about economics otherwise you'd be able to give reasons.
Says the moron who thinks his duel currency Franken plan is actually feasible. What a joke

I stand behind what I post and can address tough questions
You avoid hard questions and claim victory despite the absence of anyone agreeing with you.
You regularly have victory parades of one with all others looking at you in disbelief

Go ahead ask me why Trudeaus carbon tax plan and his tax assault on small business will be detrimental
Go ahead and ask me why excessive borrowing by Justin was the wrong thing to do

Fuji, you are a mental midget and I can best you any day of the week
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,440
3,077
113
The current US economy is all Obama. Trump hasn't even passed a budget yet.
The current US growth rate is more attributable to the US federal reserve than Obama.
His policies were not accommodative to growth , rather he applied more regulations and vetoed growth projects for environmental reasons.
Good or bad will depend upon your perspective

Recent US activity may also be traced to hope for Trumps election promises of
1. Reduced regulation particularly in the Financial sector
2. Tax reform
3. infrastructure spending

However his administration has become a circus and the confidence he can accomplish any of these is waning

I hope you are taking notes Fuji as finally you may learn something
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,399
7,276
113
What's the matter?
Did you drop your soother
Grow up

I hope you and Fuji are very happy together
However I would not trust him with the steam off my piss on a cold winters day
You really cannot disseminate what I was trying to explain to you.
Once again you start your usual dumb tantrums. No wonder Fuji got you banned from here.
When you figure out how to behave more appropriately, then we can have a civil discussion, that is if you know what being civil means.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,399
7,276
113
What value does that provide?

Insult all you want, but tie it to something tangible



???
You have a bad habit of introducing irrelevant and non related topics without tying them to anything I have stated
This makes your arguments confusing to read and disjointed. Again the point of typing out a post is to communicate, not confuse the audience.
Please review your posts with this in mind

Did you think I did not know most Canadians have a mortgage?
Did you think I did not know real estate has been a very good investment for most Canadians?

How this ties to Justin's excessive borrowing is unclear due to your poor communication skills
I can only guess you are implying if the average Canadian can borrow , so too should the government.

The problem with your weak and ill thought out argument is that home owners have to have a plan to pay back the loan. ie. the terms of the mortgage
In addition the lenders will not grant a mortgage if the debt becomes excessive

Governments are immune to these restrictions as they have the ability to raise taxes
If that is Justin's ultimate plan then he should disclose this so Canadians understand what the future for them or their kids holds
The reality is Justin is borrowing and spending because he knows the bill will not come due under his administration.
He will just kick the can down the road and it will be an issue for your kids and grand kids




As pointed out before (Do you not pay attention???).
There is a time to borrow and a time for manage costs
2008 was definatly a time to borrow.
What Harper said prior to the recession, well as you say no one is perfect and it did not cost any money
The real point Harper should be evaluated on is he acted when it was required

Justin borrowed when it was not necessary, rather he borrowed to buy the voters. with their future taxes.
I have to give him or his team credit for this as it worked. He won
It however is not a positive thing for Canadians

0.9% GDP growth for 2015 is not great, however it was not a disaster and certainly not a reason to re-inflate the debt it took Canadians decades to get under control (i.e. the debt Justin's father created)


1. Get this straight. I do not spend time visiting right wing websites. You pompous ass
2. Ask you kids when they get wacked with higher taxes if Justin's spending was wasteful (do not forget to remind them he paid $10 MM to a murdering terrorist and do not forget to remind them Justin has never has to worry about money his entire life)
3.You really need to view this from a long term perspective. Justin is borrowing with 7, 10 ,15 and 20 year maturities. That is when the bill comes due. Well past when he is no longer PM
4. A couple of quarters of above average growth is great, however it is not sustainable and certainly not worth the Billions he is borrowing
5. If the economy sustains 3.0%+ GDP growth for several years then you have an better case to justify the stimulus. Time will tell, however we are far too dependant on the US and I fear their growth will stall.
6. Did you learn something? or are you too pig headed to take an objective view?


The carbon tax and his assault on small business will prove to be very detrimental to the economy


Instead how about you take an objective look at this
Think of your kids future

.
For the 4th or 5th time I do not hate Justin
I think he is poorly qualified for the job
As for the reference to a ten year old, sadly he still does not understand the responsibilities associated with spending other peoples money, what is even sadder is he likely never will

Not having any concern for the debt you kids are going to be burdened with proves other wise


At no point have I indicate the current GDP growth is not impressive
Again your derogatory language like the A** word is uncalled for. Really you have no class, and it is once again the reason why you were BANNED.

Same old arguments. Fact is the GDP growth is 4.5% and you absolutely hate the idea that Harpo could not achieve it as he could not understand what a recession is all about. He was handed a vibrant economy on the plate, then screwed up, and the so called experts that you follow then pat him on the back. Well Steve Harpo was not qualified for the job, as he messed up on the international scene as well. The Americans are even envious about Canada having a PM like Mr. Trudeau. You hate Mr. Trudeau and it is very clear from your ridiculous comments about him. You worry about Mr. Trudeau borrowing to fix the antique infrastructure, but the sooner it is fixed the better as it helped trigger the economy. Obviously, you buy the notion that this growth was thanks to the Americans and the right wingers thank Trump for it. Hilarious.

One thing is clear, is that if the environment is not addressed, then our children will be the ones to live with it, as they will pay the price. They will not care for the extra pennies in their pockets, if they have to put up with the impact of climate change. Obviously, you are one of the climate change deniers, who is penny wise and pound foolish.

Keep up the good work Mr Trudeau. You are rejuvenating the economy that was screwed up by Steve Harpo Boy. Whose money do you think Steve Harpo Boy spent when he amassed deficits of hundreds of billions of dollars, that your children are now paying the price? The elitists got all the tax cuts that resulted in this very high deficit and a poor GDP growth under his tenure.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,440
3,077
113
You really cannot disseminate what I was trying to explain to you.
Once again you start your usual dumb tantrums. No wonder Fuji got you banned from here.
When you figure out how to behave more appropriately, then we can have a civil discussion, that is if you know what being civil means.
Oh that hurts soo much
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,440
3,077
113
Again your derogatory language like the A** word is uncalled for.
Making unsubstantiated accusations implying I spend all my time trolling right wing Nazi websites is not called for either
Really you have no class, and it is once again the reason why you were BANNED.
No I got banned because Fuji is a pussy who insulted me to no end and when cornered by my questions he chose to whine to the mods like a 12 year old tatle tail
I am not the only one he has pulled this crap on.
Once again you make incorrect assumptions

Same old arguments. Fact is the GDP growth is 4.5% and you absolutely hate the idea that Harpo could not achieve it as he could not understand what a recession is all about.
That is ridiculous
PM Harper acted when he need to
Let me clear up some more of your incorrect assumptions
1. I Do not hate Justin. I just think he is not qualified for the job
2. I want Justin to succeed. If he succeeds the country will do well
3. Be aware that any success he has now will have its costs down the road. That is the nature of debt

He was handed a vibrant economy on the plate, then screwed up, and the so called experts that you follow then pat him on the back.
That is bullshit. he managed the economy well and then this thing called a world wide financial crisis hit. He acted appropriately and Canada emerged relatively unscathed compared to the US and other countries.

Jesus
You talk about me hating Justin, (which I do not), however you hate Steven Harper so much you are incapable of objectively viewing the economic environment in which he had to manage.
The value of an opinion which is driven by such hate is worthless as you have zero objectivity
Well Steve Harpo was not qualified for the job, as he messed up on the international scene as well.
Really ?
By being tough on the dictator Putin ?

The Americans are even envious about Canada having a PM like Mr. Trudeau.
Next to trump anyone would look good even Justin
You hate Mr. Trudeau and it is very clear from your ridiculous comments about him.
Listen you ignorant fool
I have told you many time I do not hate Justin
What part of that do you not understand
Are you so arrogant that you know better than me how I feel about someone?

Justin is energetic , very principled (too our detriment), compassionate and takes a good photo
He does however lack the intelligence of his father and still worse he does not have any respect for the taxpayer

Grow up


You worry about Mr. Trudeau borrowing to fix the antique infrastructure, but the sooner it is fixed the better as it helped trigger the economy.
Infrastructure spending is necessary and a budget should be based upon needed projects.
In the election Justin threw out billions of dollars of infrastructure spending without knowing if it was enough or too much for the need projects
That is ass backwards, piss poor financial management and very irresponsible
It did however accomplish his objective, which was to buy the vote

Obviously, you buy the notion that this growth was thanks to the Americans
Given the nature of our export driven economy and the recent growth in the US I buy that notion because it is true
In addition as of January it appears not a whole lot of increased infrastructure spend has occurred
http://business.financialpost.com/n...ar-into-their-term-the-money-is-trickling-out

So Copernicus what is the driver of the growth?
It took all of 2 minutes to do the research to blow your argument away

and the right wingers thank Trump for it. Hilarious.
If you had a clue you would know his election did lift optimism in the US business community. This has waned as he has proven to be the head clown in his circus administration

One thing is clear, is that if the environment is not addressed, then our children will be the ones to live with it, as they will pay the price. They will not care for the extra pennies in their pockets, if they have to put up with the impact of climate change. Obviously, you are one of the climate change deniers, who is penny wise and pound foolish.
Once again you incorrectly make assumptions about my views
While I do have a concern that global warming may be man made, I know enough to objectively sceptical. The time line of recorded temperature is miniscule relative to the 4.5 billion year history of an ever changing planet.
If we do nothing and we cook the planet, our extinction will be the biggest sin man kind has ever committed

That said, I also understand that without US participation in tackling climate change all our efforts will be for naught.
In addition we shall make our economy uncompetitive. If the US was onboard this might make sense.
As I mentioned Justin is very principled, an admirable quality most of the time, however in this case it is a bad decision


Keep up the good work Mr Trudeau. You are rejuvenating the economy that was screwed up by Steve Harpo Boy.
You will never understand until your kid freaks about the tax increases he/ she have to pay
Whose money do you think Steve Harpo Boy spent when he amassed deficits of hundreds of billions of dollars, that your children are now paying the price?
What part of financial crisis do you not understand?
If you can pretend that did not occur you have no business even pretending you understand economics


The elitists got all the tax cuts that resulted in this very high deficit and a poor GDP growth under his tenure.
Bullshit.
9 of 10 years of positive GDP growth. Justin will not equal that record
as for tax cuts the wealthy pay a lot of tax
Anything over $200,000 and the income tax grab is over 51%, Layer on top all the sales taxes and it likely approaching 60-63%
I guess you think Justin and Kathleen are better suited to spend more of our money than we are?
Penalizing your most productive citizens is a very bad idea
This is outrageous
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,399
7,276
113
Making unsubstantiated accusations implying I spend all my time trolling right wing Nazi websites is not called for either


No I got banned because Fuji is a pussy who insulted me to no end and when cornered by my questions he chose to whine to the mods like a 12 year old tatle tail
I am not the only one he has pulled this crap on.
Once again you make incorrect assumptions


That is ridiculous
PM Harper acted when he need to
Let me clear up some more of your incorrect assumptions
1. I Do not hate Justin. I just think he is not qualified for the job
2. I want Justin to succeed. If he succeeds the country will do well
3. Be aware that any success he has now will have its costs down the road. That is the nature of debt


That is bullshit. he managed the economy well and then this thing called a world wide financial crisis hit. He acted appropriately and Canada emerged relatively unscathed compared to the US and other countries.

Jesus
You talk about me hating Justin, (which I do not), however you hate Steven Harper so much you are incapable of objectively viewing the economic environment in which he had to manage.
The value of an opinion which is driven by such hate is worthless as you have zero objectivity

Really ?
By being tough on the dictator Putin ?


Next to trump anyone would look good even Justin

Listen you ignorant fool
I have told you many time I do not hate Justin
What part of that do you not understand
Are you so arrogant that you know better than me how I feel about someone?

Justin is energetic , very principled (too our detriment), compassionate and takes a good photo
He does however lack the intelligence of his father and still worse he does not have any respect for the taxpayer

Grow up



Infrastructure spending is necessary and a budget should be based upon needed projects.
In the election Justin threw out billions of dollars of infrastructure spending without knowing if it was enough or too much for the need projects
That is ass backwards, piss poor financial management and very irresponsible
It did however accomplish his objective, which was to buy the vote


Given the nature of our export driven economy and the recent growth in the US I buy that notion because it is true
In addition as of January it appears not a whole lot of increased infrastructure spend has occurred
http://business.financialpost.com/n...ar-into-their-term-the-money-is-trickling-out

So Copernicus what is the driver of the growth?
It took all of 2 minutes to do the research to blow your argument away


If you had a clue you would know his election did lift optimism in the US business community. This has waned as he has proven to be the head clown in his circus administration



Once again you incorrectly make assumptions about my views
While I do have a concern that global warming may be man made, I know enough to objectively sceptical. The time line of recorded temperature is miniscule relative to the 4.5 billion year history of an ever changing planet.
If we do nothing and we cook the planet, our extinction will be the biggest sin man kind has ever committed

That said, I also understand that without US participation in tackling climate change all our efforts will be for naught.
In addition we shall make our economy uncompetitive. If the US was onboard this might make sense.
As I mentioned Justin is very principled, an admirable quality most of the time, however in this case it is a bad decision



You will never understand until your kid freaks about the tax increases he/ she have to pay

What part of financial crisis do you not understand?
If you can pretend that did not occur you have no business even pretending you understand economics




Bullshit.
9 of 10 years of positive GDP growth. Justin will not equal that record
as for tax cuts the wealthy pay a lot of tax
Anything over $200,000 and the income tax grab is over 51%, Layer on top all the sales taxes and it likely approaching 60-63%
I guess you think Justin and Kathleen are better suited to spend more of our money than we are?
Penalizing your most productive citizens is a very bad idea
This is outrageous
Show me where I mentioned "trolling Nazi Websites". Either you are confused about who said that to you, or you are a liar.
You are the one that started all the insults.
You do not want Mr Trudeau to succeed, but since he is doing so, you just cannot live with it. But keep on displaying your hatred for him. You are the ignorant one, pretending to be mr know it all. Your accusations of "throwing billions of dollars" is pure stupidity.
Harper had no clue that Canada was in a recession, but eventually when the economy was going downhill, then he started to take some action. Maybe you have a very short memory. The USA economy was practically heading for a depression, and Obama had to try and save it from doing so. Harper on the other hand was handed an economy that was booming. So trying to give him credit for the state of the Canadian economy compared to the USA, just either shows your bias or displays your total ignorance in the matter. So I understand the whole economics better than you. Again for the umpteenth time, you hate Trudeau and and are not giving him any credit. He is spending on infrastructure although not as quickly as expected. However, if the economy is growing then he has more leeway to spend at a slower pace. Are you complaining about the dollars not spent? So where and what in your opinion is he wasting the cash on? If Steve Harpo was elected, he promised to spend over $50 billion on the unproven F35 fighter jets. What a waste that would have been as, they had not done their homework. Thankfully Mr Trudeau threw that plan in the garbage. Off course you try to find excuses for him. Again you go on about tax increases, when Trudeau has actually cut the taxes for the majority of Canadians, such as the middle class and low earners. But off course you do not appreciate it. He did not increase corporate taxes. But you post a link to show that he spent "LESS" of your tax dollars than what Steve Harpo did, but the growth rate is 4.5% and you still complain about him spending your kids dollars. You are a clown.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
The current US economy is all Obama. Trump hasn't even passed a budget yet.
You are ignorant if you think passing a budget has anything to do with the economy.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
You are ignorant if you think failing to pass any significant legislation has anything to do with the economy.
You must not have any money in the stock market.... you're such a tool.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,440
3,077
113
Show me where I mentioned "trolling Nazi Websites". Either you are confused about who said that to you, or you are a liar.
It was implied
You are the one that started all the insults.
He hit me first your honour
You do not want Mr Trudeau to succeed, but since he is doing so, you just cannot live with it.
Gee lets see
I say explicitly I want him to succeed
You say I do not want him to succeed
What exactly qualifies you to know better than me what I want?
But keep on displaying your hatred for him.
For the umpteenth time I do not hate him
Can you not tell the difference between hate and a lack of confidence he is up for the very important responsibility?
Are you that stupid?

You are the ignorant one, pretending to be mr know it all.
Well it appears I know more than you
Your accusations of "throwing billions of dollars" is pure stupidity.
Really ?
Campaign promises to run deficits in perpetuity.
Almost two years later he still has no plan to come back to balance
That is the definition of "throwing billions of dollars"

Harper had no clue that Canada was in a recession, but eventually when the economy was going downhill, then he started to take some action.
Maybe you have a very short memory.
Every economist was calling for a soft landing up until a few months before the shit hit the fan
Di you know better? If so how much did you make shorting US bank stocks? Did you sell you house and buy a comparable for less in august 2008?
I did not think so
The USA economy was practically heading for a depression, and Obama had to try and save it from doing so. Harper on the other hand was handed an economy that was booming.
He became prime minister 2 years before 2008 so yur timing is off and if you think our economy is immune to US event , your in dire need of some re-education
So trying to give him credit for the state of the Canadian economy compared to the USA, just either shows your bias or displays your total ignorance in the matter.
We escaped that mess in much better shape than just about any developed economy. That is a fact
So I understand the whole economics better than you
.
It appears you do not understand anything about economics

Again for the umpteenth time, you hate Trudeau and are not giving him any credit.
I told you he is compassionate, principled and takes a nice picture
What else did you want?
What an idiot!
He is spending on infrastructure although not as quickly as expected.
Of coarse it is not as quickly as expected
That's what happens when you apply ready shoot aim planning
However, if the economy is growing then he has more leeway to spend at a slower pace. Are you complaining about the dollars not spent?
Do not worry, Justin will manage to put those dollars to waste

If Steve Harpo was elected, he promised to spend over $50 billion on the unproven F35 fighter jets. What a waste that would have been as, they had not done their homework. Thankfully Mr Trudeau threw that plan in the garbage. Off course you try to find excuses for him.
How much to cancel the contracts?

Again you go on about tax increases, when Trudeau has actually cut the taxes for the majority of Canadians, such as the middle class and low earners.
Why not plan effectively, manage the finances responsibly and give all Canadian tax cuts
Nope Justin /Kathleen think they know hw to spend 60% of my money better than I could
That should be criminal
But off course you do not appreciate it. He did not increase corporate taxes. But you post a link to show that he spent "LESS" of your tax dollars than what Steve Harpo did, but the growth rate is 4.5% and you still complain about him spending your kids dollars. You are a clown.
Your an idiot. He will spend all that money and more
It is a timing issue and only used to show you that his infrastructure spending is not the driver of the recent growth rate ( US activity and The Canadian Consumer are driving the growth)
Once he does spend it the result will be to drive up interest rates

If Justin has any clue he should push out the spend and balance the budget two years in a row
I would vote for him if he acted responsibly
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,399
7,276
113
It was implied
Again no proof. You are a liar.


Gee lets see
I say explicitly I want him to succeed
You say I do not want him to succeed
What exactly qualifies you to know better than me what I want?
You are denying that he has been doing a good job for the economy with a GDP growth of 4.5% and many more jobs created. OKay??

For the umpteenth time I do not hate him

Can you not tell the difference between hate and a lack of confidence he is up for the very important responsibility?
I am stupid?
Corrected it for you.

Well it appears I know more than you
No you do not. You are just an arrogant right wing dude.

Really ?
Campaign promises to run deficits in perpetuity.
Almost two years later he still has no plan to come back to balance
That is the definition of "throwing billions of dollars"
Pretty plain that you do not know where he is wasting all that money, just the usual right wing speculation. He is not spending it as quickly as your own link stated. So maybe he thinks it does not require that much stimulation for now.

Every economist was calling for a soft landing up until a few months before the shit hit the fan
Di you know better? If so how much did you make shorting US bank stocks? Did you sell you house and buy a comparable for less in august 2008?
I did not think so
Pure expected nonsense.

He became prime minister 2 years before 2008 so yur timing is off and if you think our economy is immune to US event , your in dire need of some re-education

We escaped that mess in much better shape than just about any developed economy. That is a fact
Yes, he became a PM before 2008. But the damage was already done South of the border when he was PM and they were in a steep decline, while the Canadian economy was already the envy of the world.
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/news/2006/12/21/2420/the-u-s-economy-in-review-2006/

It appears you do not understand anything about economics
I understand it far better than you.

I told you he is compassionate, principled and takes a nice picture
What else did you want?
I am an idiot!
Correction again.

Of coarse it is not as quickly as expected
That's what happens when you apply ready shoot aim planning
Do not worry, Justin will manage to put those dollars to waste
Nonsense and more garbled nonsense.

How much to cancel the contracts?
Mr Trudeau saved $50 billion in expenses for this moronic adventure by Stevie Boy Harper. Trudeau may have been penny foolish, but he was pound wise in that respect.

Why not plan effectively, manage the finances responsibly and give all Canadian tax cuts
Nope Justin /Kathleen think they know hw to spend 60% of my money better than I could
That should be criminal
Your hatred know no bounds. The rich barely care but you stay awake at night thinking about them. Boo hoo.

I am an idiot. He will spend all that money and more
It is a timing issue and only used to show you that his infrastructure spending is not the driver of the recent growth rate ( US activity and The Canadian Consumer are driving the growth)
Once he does spend it the result will be to drive up interest rates
Interest rates have gone up in the USA as well. Most advanced nations have higher interest rates. The Bank of Canada sets those rates. Yet no proof that he is spending more money.

If Justin has any clue he should push out the spend and balance the budget two years in a row
I would vote for him if he acted responsibly
He does not need your advice. He has to do what he was elected to do and think in the interest of the country, not just what you or the right wingies want.
 
Toronto Escorts