At least this proves you’re a real Rielly fan like you said you wereInteresting stats. I guess I'm so used to Rielly being the Leaf's best offensive defenseman and playing with Toronto's "high octane" offense I thought his stats would be better.

At least this proves you’re a real Rielly fan like you said you wereInteresting stats. I guess I'm so used to Rielly being the Leaf's best offensive defenseman and playing with Toronto's "high octane" offense I thought his stats would be better.
Plus, I see Rielly in action much more than Pietrangela.At least this proves you’re a real Rielly fan like you said you were![]()
hey jerkcostanza - guess you didn't read the first post of this thread. Why don't you fuck off back to your own TML thread? Your shit disturbing isn't wanted here. Everyone else is getting along in this thread. If you can't stop following members around for the sole reason of antagonizing them, your participation in this thread isn't welcome.I'm checking into it, but I'm pretty sure every general manager in the NHL is constrained by the cap.
On the surface, this feels like a pro move by the Sharks so that Marleau can do a final lap with his long-time team and then slip gently into retirement. Thinking he won't likely pick up too many minutes or make too much more than a locker room contribution. Front role office awaits...Patrick Marleau signs for the league minimum of $700,000.
Of course, one never knows with Dubas (other than he is constrained by the cap) .
Then why did you say it in the first place?It goes without saying but I guess for you we actually have to say it.
He made a rational point, without calling somebody a jerk or telling them to fuck off. Is nobody allowed to politely disagree? Evidently you can't follow your own recommendations. Please keep things civil.hey jerkcostanza - guess you didn't read the first post of this thread. Why don't you fuck off back to your own TML thread? Your shit disturbing isn't wanted here. Everyone else is getting along in this thread. If you can't stop following members around for the sole reason of antagonizing them, your participation in this thread isn't welcome.
Yeah, that is a really classy move by the Sharks. This way he can retire gracefully as a Shark. Hall of Fame next.On the surface, this feels like a pro move by the Sharks so that Marleau can do a final lap with his long-time team and then slip gently into retirement. Thinking he won't likely pick up too many minutes or make too much more than a locker room contribution. Front role office awaits...
Shack has been on my ignore list for a long time, so I don't see any of his posts anymore. I've been trying to give gcostanza the benefit of the doubt because when he leaves the BS at the door, he actually offers some interesting perspectives. But if he can't put aside the petty harassment and antagonism, I'd prefer he just have his 'fun' with his buddies in his own thread and stop ruining things for the rest of us here. Same goes for Shack and superstar_88. I thought the first post of this thread had some pretty clear messaging. If it continues, I'll take it up with the mods. They say they want to put an end to the crap here, so maybe we'll need to inquire how serious they actually are about it.Yeah, that is a really classy move by the Sharks. This way he can retire gracefully as a Shark. Hall of Fame next.
BTW: If Costanza and Shack have any decency they would restrict their silly antics to their own Leaf thread and leave the rest of us alone.
Shack has been on my ignore list for a long time, so I don't see any of his posts anymore. I've been trying to give gcostanza the benefit of the doubt because when he leaves the BS at the door, he actually offers some interesting perspectives. But if he can't put aside the petty harassment and antagonism, I'd prefer he just have his 'fun' with his buddies in his own thread and stop ruining things for the rest of us here. Same goes for Shack and superstar_88. I thought the first post of this thread had some pretty clear messaging. If it continues, I'll take it up with the mods. They say they want to put an end to the crap here, so maybe we'll need to inquire how serious they actually are about it.
hey jerkcostanza - guess you didn't read the first post of this thread. Why don't you fuck off back to your own TML thread? Your shit disturbing isn't wanted here. Everyone else is getting along in this thread. If you can't stop following members around for the sole reason of antagonizing them, your participation in this thread isn't welcome.
If you viewed Gauthier in his 1st season as a pro, and this past season, you just might call Barb Underhill a miracle worker.
How exactly would that happen?
The only way Taylor Hall moves prior to his contract expiration is if he wants to be traded.
The Buffalo club will just ignore the NTC/NMC in his contract?
Well, the owners are tRUMPies, so, contracts and legalities mean little to nothing to them.
Possible, I suppose.
I'm checking into it, but I'm pretty sure every general manager in the NHL is constrained by the cap.
The above are 2 posts by John Wick and all of my posts in this thread.As I write this post, 6 teams are over the Upper Cap Limit.
Included on the list are:
Arizona
St. Louis
Vegas
Anaheim
Montreal
Washington
The closest team under, but nudging up against the Upper Limit?
That would be the Winnipeg Jets
SumBitch
I‘m sure John will respond in his own way, and I don’t have any intention to judge this seemingly ongoing “pissing contest” between the two camps; what I’d like to do is to offer an observation as a bystander.The above are 2 posts by John Wick and all of my posts in this thread.
In all seriousness:
I did use the word SumBitch in one of them, and mentioned the political affiliation of the owners of an NHL club in another.
I fail to see where I disturbed anyone's shit, harrassed or antagonized a member.
I asked a couple questions.
I provided some facts.
I offered my opinion, concisely and without cursing (other than the SumBitch).
Could Mr. Wick offer me an example in those posts where I disturbed a member's shit or antagonized someone?
Now, if a particular member is delicate and sensitive, and offended by the word SumBitch, I do apologize.
It's not just JW who is pissed off. Other members have also expressed their displeasure, to put it mildly, with the antics of these 3. Here below is just one example how a respected member think about these 3.I‘m sure John will respond in his own way, and I don’t have any intention to judge this seemingly ongoing “pissing contest” between the two camps; what I’d like to do is to offer an observation as a bystander.
First off, I don’t find any of your posts in this partocular thread out of line. A little mockery is not offensive and I do think John might have overreacted a little bit.
Having said that, I think I can understand why, it’s because of this preconception that you/Shack/S88 are ganging up to bully Darts. Again I’m not here to judge if this “preconception“ is right or wrong, fair or unfair, but I do think that’s what caused his reaction.
This “preconception“ is no different than how you guys look at Darts’ posts. You believe he’s is a Habs fan, a Leafs hater and is here to troll Leafs’ fan and that often lead to “over reaction” in your response.
My humble opinion is that if we can just leave these “preconceptions“ aside and just concentrate on the subjects in discussion without preconceived notions, we can get into a lot more interesting discussion or debates as grownups.
My advance apologies if my opinions offend anyone.
I appreciate hearing a neutral observer's opinion. Thanks.I‘m sure John will respond in his own way, and I don’t have any intention to judge this seemingly ongoing “pissing contest” between the two camps; what I’d like to do is to offer an observation as a bystander.
First off, I don’t find any of your posts in this partocular thread out of line. A little mockery is not offensive and I do think John might have overreacted a little bit.
Having said that, I think I can understand why, it’s because of this preconception that you/Shack/S88 are ganging up to bully Darts. Again I’m not here to judge if this “preconception“ is right or wrong, fair or unfair, but I do think that’s what caused his reaction.
This “preconception“ is no different than how you guys look at Darts’ posts. You believe he’s is a Habs fan, a Leafs hater and is here to troll Leafs’ fan and that often lead to “over reaction” in your response.
My humble opinion is that if we can just leave these “preconceptions“ aside and just concentrate on the subjects in discussion without preconceived notions, we can get into a lot more interesting discussion or debates as grownups.
My advance apologies if my opinions offend anyone.
Aside from mentioning his history of falsely accusing people of racism, I have no desire to engage in any conversation with Shack because he is nothing more than a trash talker.Aside from mentioning his history of racist posts,
You’re welcome Shack. I haven’t followed other threads so I can’t comment on your assertions that Darts is a racist. From my very brief exchange on the political issues with him, I did get the impression that he’s an admirer of the Chinese Communist Party which in my opinion is an evil regime and is harmful to the free world. However I recognize that I could be wrong about this impression of Darts so I won’t let that affect the way I communicate with him on the sports discussions.I appreciate hearing a neutral observer's opinion. Thanks.
Aside from mentioning his history of racist posts, I have no desire to get into an explanation of any length as to why some of us are less than enamoured of darts' posts. I will just say that, for me, it has nothing to do with darts' preference of hockey teams.
Actually no, we should talk sometime.I did get the impression that he’s an admirer of the Chinese Communist Party
You are bang on smuddan. I am simply fed up of the bullying that these three posters seem to delight in perpetrating on ANYONE who they disagree with. Darts is just the 'target du jour'. They follow him around the board incessantly quoting virtually every post he makes, always with the goal of challenging, belittling, abusing, insulting and antagonizing - the subject doesn't matter in the least. It's just a pretense under which they can continue the bullying. They brand him a racist. They perpetually call him by derogatory and insulting nicknames. It just never stops. It's nothing but a concerted, coordinated effort to run someone out of town. Most of the time, Darts doesn't even respond, so they ramp it up all the more. They think they're cool, and funny, smart, and oh so mature. Right. Pack of ten year olds chasing the same kid around the schoolyard every damn recess. If/When the kid changes schools, they find a new target.First off, I don’t find any of your posts in this partocular thread out of line. A little mockery is not offensive and I do think John might have overreacted a little bit.
Having said that, I think I can understand why, it’s because of this preconception that you/Shack/S88 are ganging up to bully Darts. Again I’m not here to judge if this “preconception“ is right or wrong, fair or unfair, but I do think that’s what caused his reaction.
I've asked you a few times to explain how this post is not racist.Aside from mentioning his history of falsely accusing people of racism, I have no desire to engage in any conversation with Shack because he is nothing more than a trash talker.
Aside from the line in my sig quote, which is blatant, he has made references to the colour of the skin of perpetrators when a crime has been committed and ascribed certain characteristics to Asians for no other reason than they are Asian.You’re welcome Shack. I haven’t followed other threads so I can’t comment on your assertions that Darts is a racist. From my very brief exchange on the political issues with him, I did get the impression that he’s an admirer of the Chinese Communist Party which in my opinion is an evil regime and is harmful to the free world. However I recognize that I could be wrong about this impression of Darts so I won’t let that affect the way I communicate with him on the sports discussions.