Toronto Escorts

37% of Covid Infections had 2 Doses of Vaccine

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
23,811
47,614
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
I would bet many “anti vaxxers” have already gotten or will soon get their shots, but like to roleplay in anonymous forums like this.
Would you really bet on that?...I wouldn't.

Most of the people I know that have chosen not to do it are set in their beliefs.

Now of all those people only 3 that I can think of are going to anti lockdown rallies. Blatantly showing a disregard for any restrictions.

The rest are following provincial guidelines to the hilt.
 

lenny2

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2012
3,574
729
113
Death wise Seychelles is way above their historical averages
They have more deaths NOW after vaccination than they had before

28 total deaths
3 in past 7 days
17 of those after country was re-opened (vaccinations complete)

Their case counts and ICUs are also way above their avg for past year
No surprise there. That's what is likely or possible to happen when you (1) "re-open" a place without having reached herd immunity & (2) where a more infectious covid19 VOC has been and (3) less effective vaccines used & (4) the usual groups of covidiots acting irresponsibly.

"Just under two thirds of those are either unvaccinated or have only had one dose, and the rest have had two doses, he said."

"While data on genetic sequencing are not yet available for infections in April, the B.1.351 variant, first identified in South Africa late last year, was found in the Seychelles in February, he said. AstraZeneca’s vaccine appeared to be less effective against that variant in a study, and South Africa halted plans to use it.

"... "Other nations that have vaccinated large portions of their populations have seen Covid cases plunge. In the U.K., where 52% of people have a first dose, cases are down 96% from a recent high in January. In Israel, where 60% have had at least one dose, new cases are down 99%."



" "The CoronaVac vaccine developed by Sinovac, a private company, was found to have an efficacy rate of just 50.4% in clinical trials in Brazil.
China recently announced that their vaccine has a very low efficacy which is strange for them to admit.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/12/china...hnk/index.html
"The protection rates of existing vaccines are not high," Gao Fu, director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, told a conference in the southwestern city of Chengdu on Saturday.
"In March, the United Arab Emirates started offering a third dose of a Sinopharm vaccine to residents who failed to generate sufficient antibodies after two shots." "


"Is San Francisco on the verge of a herd immunity breakthrough? Experts are optimistic

https://news.yahoo.com/herd-immunity...101403071.html
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,709
5,843
113
Anti-vaxx twerps believe in magic like homeopathy and faith healing, so unless a vaccine can magically create a virus-proof shield around the human body they can't understand how it works. Science is hard after grade 1.
Well the latest is Pine Tree Tea. It is floating on the Alt right platforms as the magical cure for the Covid-19 Infection and prevention. They have one concern that pregnant women should avoid it.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
48,060
8,502
113
Toronto
Covid shots are not vaccines.
So if the Moderna, Pfizer and AZ shots are not vaccines, please tell us what they are. A reference or two to back up your definition would be appreciated.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
29,223
52,458
113
So if the Moderna, Pfizer and AZ shots are not vaccines, please tell us what they are. A reference or two to back up your definition would be appreciated.
I think the argument is that they are "medical devices" for some reason.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
48,060
8,502
113
Toronto
I think the argument is that they are "medical devices" for some reason.
In that case, vaccines can be considered part of a larger group, a medical device. By any definition of vaccine, these shots qualify.

It's like ants are are ants even though they are part of a larger group, insects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Male4Strapon

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
29,223
52,458
113
In that case, vaccines can be considered part of a larger group, a medical device. By any definition of vaccine, these shots qualify.

It's like ants are are ants even though they are part of a larger group, insects.
You can make a very strict definition of vaccine that says it has to be a live or attenuated organism and then these wouldn't qualify.
Of course, lots of previous vaccines wouldn't qualify either.

You could be even more strict and say that vaccines come from the word "cow" and unless it is cowpox it isn't a vaccine.
Of course, that has the problem that Louis Pasteur himself is the one who recommended extending the word "vaccine" to the whole approach.

I suspect this is more likely a Sovereign Citizen type play. You know, the people who believe things like "if the flag has a fringe it is technically an admiralty court and so if you stand up and say the right magic words you don't have to pay your taxes"? There's a whole ream of life dedicated to the "one magic trick interpreting the laws" view of things.

So there is probably some law somewhere that they think controls the situation and if these aren't "vaccines" under that law they can resist or it can be banned or whatever.
It's like the people who argue about gun control by saying "It's a magazine, not a clip" or whatever.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
48,060
8,502
113
Toronto
You can make a very strict definition of vaccine that says it has to be a live or attenuated organism and then these wouldn't qualify.
Of course, lots of previous vaccines wouldn't qualify either.
I don't think that the method of engineering an injection or drink or pill or whatever, which stimulates the host body's immune system to produce antibodies, changes whether it is a vaccine or not.

So there is probably some law somewhere that they think controls the situation and if these aren't "vaccines" under that law they can resist or it can be banned or whatever.
The medical community decides what and what is not a vaccine, not something as defined by laymen lawmakers. (Maybe Rand Paul can decide.)
 

PeteOsborne

Kingston recon
Feb 12, 2020
2,042
1,850
113
kingston
I don't think that the method of engineering an injection or drink or pill or whatever, which stimulates the host body's immune system to produce antibodies, changes whether it is a vaccine or not.

The medical community decides what and what is not a vaccine, not something as defined by laymen lawmakers. (Maybe Rand Paul can decide.)
Don't believe this has to be posted but yet here it is.
Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,615
2,496
113
So vaccines work do they?
Yes they do TeeJay. Let's take Israel for example. Compare the number of cases and deaths between then and now. They started mass vaccinations in January 2021 and currently 56% of their population has been fully vaccinated. But I'm sure it's just a coincidence and you'll tell us the "real" reason their numbers are so low.

Jan. 27, 2021 - New COVID cases 11,934 - 7-Day average 6,575
May 12, 2021 - New COVID cases 30 - 7-Day average 38

Jan. 27, 2021 - New COVID deaths 92 - 7-Day average 61
May 12, 2021 - New COVID deaths 1 - 7-Day average 1

https://www.google.ca/search?q=covi...y43mAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdperABAA&sclient=gws-wiz

https://www.google.ca/search?q=covi...YAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6yAEIwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/world/covid-vaccinations-tracker.html
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
29,223
52,458
113
I don't think that the method of engineering an injection or drink or pill or whatever, which stimulates the host body's immune system to produce antibodies, changes whether it is a vaccine or not.
It's just definitional issues. Definitions and labels evolve. Sometimes they are relevant, sometimes they aren't.
If "vaccine" means "something that stimulates the body's immune system to promote active immunity to a specific pathogen" then obviously these are vaccines.
If "vaccine" is a more specific subgroup of the things above and only means "dead virus or bacteria injected for the purpose of stimulating the body's immune system..." then it wouldn't.

It would only matter if it is relevant to something.

The medical community decides what and what is not a vaccine, not something as defined by laymen lawmakers. (Maybe Rand Paul can decide.)
Of course laymen and lawmakers can define it. If they want to define "vaccine" strictly then they can. Lots of things are polysemic. "Planet" has more than one definition and different things are planets depending on who is defining it.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
48,060
8,502
113
Toronto
Don't believe this has to be posted but yet here it is.
Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
Never hurts to post facts/the truth.

Lawmakers are not the ones to decide what constitutes a vaccine.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
48,060
8,502
113
Toronto
It's just definitional issues. Definitions and labels evolve. Sometimes they are relevant, sometimes they aren't.
If "vaccine" means "something that stimulates the body's immune system to promote active immunity to a specific pathogen" then obviously these are vaccines.
If "vaccine" is a more specific subgroup of the things above and only means "dead virus or bacteria injected for the purpose of stimulating the body's immune system..." then it wouldn't.
Which is another way of saying that it is semantics and using them to fit an agenda.

It is not science. It is BS.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
29,223
52,458
113
Never hurts to post facts/the truth.

Lawmakers are not the ones to decide what constitutes a vaccine.
Of course they are. So are scientists.
They are likely to have different definitions at times and the same at others.

Which is another way of saying that it is semantics and using them to fit an agenda.

It is not science. It is BS.
Of course this i semantics to fit an agenda, that's what I said from the beginning.
 
Toronto Escorts