Mirage Escorts
Toronto Escorts

37% of Covid Infections had 2 Doses of Vaccine

sp free

Well-known member
May 31, 2003
2,094
588
113
There wasn’t a second wave, or a third, and there won’t be a 4th.

These are manufactured through asymptotic testing with a faulty test. This is a known known.

You go right ahead and try to discredit Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former VP at Pfizer, Pete0sborne, hooker review board troll extraordinaire!

😂
 

PeteOsborne

Kingston recon
Feb 12, 2020
2,035
1,837
113
kingston
There wasn’t a second wave, or a third, and there won’t be a 4th.

These are manufactured through asymptotic testing with a faulty test. This is a known known.

You go right ahead and try to discredit Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former VP at Pfizer, Pete0sborne, hooker review board troll extraordinaire!

😂
I don't have to, his peers already have!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Male4Strapon

lenny2

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2012
3,574
729
113
sportsm60;13496470 said:
X-Files;13496500 said:
You mean the - EX - PFizer scientist Michael Yeadon who left the company in 2011? The same guy referred to here:

"In October, Yeadon wrote a column for the United Kingdom’s Daily Mail newspaper that also appeared on MailOnline, one of the world’s most-visited news websites. It declared that deaths caused by COVID-19, which then totaled about 45,000 in Britain, will soon “fizzle out” and Britons “should immediately be allowed to resume normal life.” Since then, the disease has killed about another 80,000 people in the UK."

"...Thousands of his tweets stretching back to the start of the pandemic document a dramatic shift in his views – early on, he supported a vaccine strategy. But they offer few clues to explain his radical turnabout.

"...When the coronavirus pandemic reached the UK in March 2020, Yeadon initially expressed support for developing a vaccine. He tweeted: “Covid 19 is not going away. Until we have a vaccine or herd immunity” – natural resistance resulting from prior exposure to the virus – “all that can be done is to slow its spread.” A week later he tweeted: “A vaccine might be along towards the end of 2021, if we’re really lucky.”

When a fellow Twitter user said vaccines “harm many, many people,” Yeadon replied: “Ok, please refuse it, but do not impede its flow to neutrals or those keen to get it, thanks.”

After Mathai Mammen, the global head of research & development for Janssen, the pharmaceutical division of Johnson & Johnson, posted on LinkedIn last summer that his company had started clinical trials of a vaccine, Yeadon responded: “Lovely to see this milestone, Mathai!” Mammen didn’t respond to a request for comment.

...By September 2020, Yeadon’s statements were attracting attention beyond Twitter. At the time, a movement had emerged in Britain against lockdowns and other restrictions meant to curb the disease. He co-authored a lengthy article on a website called Lockdown Sceptics. It declared that the “pandemic as an event in the UK is essentially complete.” And, “There is no biological principle that leads us to expect a second wave.” Britain soon entered a much more deadly second wave.

On Oct. 16, he wrote another lengthy article for the same website: “There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease.”

....“I obviously disagree with Mike and his recent views,” he said. Treherne’s company is researching brain inflammation, which he said could be triggered by coronaviruses. “This does not sound like the guy I knew 20 years ago.”

Moschos, the ex-colleague who took issue with one of Yeadon’s tweets, said he considered him a mentor when they worked together at the drugmaker from 2008 to 2011. More recently, Moschos has been researching whether it’s possible to test for COVID-19 with breath samples. He said Yeadon’s views are “a huge disappointment.” He recounted hearing Yeadon in a radio interview last year.

“There was a tone in his voice that was nothing like I ever remembered of Mike,” Moschos said. “It was very angry, very bitter.”

...LaMattina said he had lost touch with Yeadon in recent years. Shown links to Yeadon’s video declaring the pandemic over and a copy of his petition to halt COVID-19 clinical trials, LaMattina replied: “This is all news to me and a bit of a shock. This seems out of character for the person I knew.”

After losing his job at Pfizer in 2011, Yeadon set up a biotech company...

....Earlier this year, a group of Yeadon’s former Pfizer colleagues expressed their concern in a private letter, according to a draft reviewed by Reuters.

“We have become acutely aware of your views on COVID-19 over the last few months … the single mindedness, lack of scientific rigour and one sided interpretation of often poor quality data is far removed from the Mike Yeadon we so respected and enjoyed working with.”

Noting his “vast following on social media” and that his claim about infertility “has spread globally,” the group wrote, “We are very worried that you are putting people’s health at risk.”

lol
 

northofsixty

Member
Jun 23, 2017
1,834
1,583
113
Trying to stay in a Happy Place

So this is your shining example of one of the multiple studies definitely proving that lockdowns don't work???

I guess you and I have a very different idea of what constitutes a valid study. A disgruntled former pfizer scientist says "lockdowns don't work" in a Facebook post and you conclude that 1) this is actually a "study" and 2) this is absolute proof that this must be true.

So in answer to your post saying "You're welcome" I say thank you for providing definitive proof that you have zero credibility (and you have multiple posts confirming that fact)

Please redeem yourself by posting more of your multiple studies as surely you can do better than a single Facebook post or can you?
 
Last edited:

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
28,803
51,407
113
So this is your shining example of one of the multiple studies definitely proving that lockdowns don't work???
You just don't understand how one guy ranting on Facebook and saying he is going to "march towards the guns" is actually multiple studies?
It involves super fancy science things that you probably couldn't comprehend.

So in answer to your post saying "You're welcome" I say thank you for providing definitive proof that you have zero credibility (and you have multiple posts confirming that fact)
He is helpful that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: northofsixty
Toronto Escorts