Who will you be voting for??

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Are you really that lazy or did you conveniently miss this part?
" Liberal MP Adam van Koeverden, the parliamentary secretary to Guilbeault, aggressively pushed back against Poilievre's motion Tuesday. He called the Conservative leader a climate-change denier who threatens the country's future."

Are you kidding?
I said this in my previous post: "The article opens with that but I dont see where he called Pierre a climate change denier."
Yeah, I saw that line.
But where in the article does it explicitly quote the MP calling Pierre a climate change denier?

Nothing wrong with someone condemning racists. But that's not what happened here

Unless you didn't read the article Trudeau made the comment in light of a protest organized by the group La Meute.
He was right.
Here is a brief from wikipedia:

La Meute is a far -right, identitarian and nationalist pressure group opposed to illegal immigration and Islam.
Police officers, experts and the majority of journalists place La Meute on the far right . It is notably described as xenophobic Islamophobic supremacist, ultranationalist and even populist.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

The Conservatives surged ahead in the polls because people thought Trudeau would not be able to stand up to Trump.

Wow, nice mental gymnastics there.
Trudeau's rating had been tanking for like 2 years and reached a low point when Freeland quit.
Nothing to do with Trump.
Pierre capitalized on hatred for Trudeau, leveraged inflation and shot up in popularity.
But after Trump came to power he just appeared a weak leader pushing MAGA-lite.
Which is why he lost his own riding.
He needs to take responsibility for that.
As for Trump preferring Carney, it is to take credit as usual.
As if he is king maker.
But he said this before Pierre's fortunes tanked.
So does he actually prefer Carney?

 

[Skoob]

Are you kidding?
I said this in my previous post: "The article opens with that but I dont see where he called Pierre a climate change denier."
Yeah, I saw that line.
But where in the article does it explicitly quote the MP calling Pierre a climate change denier?

Unless you didn't read the article Trudeau made the comment in light of a protest organized by the group La Meute.
He was right.
Here is a brief from wikipedia:

Are you serious?

Your response proves 3 things:
- all you read is headlines
- you don't actually read the body of an article
- you desperately distract when cornered

I even copied/pasted/bolded the exact line you are playing dumb about. It's in the body of the article not in the "opening".

Never ask me to prove anything to you because it's a waste of time and I'll remind you of this.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Are you serious?

Your response proves 3 things:
- all you read is headlines
- you don't actually read the body of an article
- you desperately distract when cornered

I even copied/pasted/bolded the exact line you are playing dumb about. It's in the body of the article not in the "opening".

Never ask me to prove anything to you because it's a waste of time and I'll remind you of this.

You are the one who read the first line in the article.
I read the entire article and I made my reply.
I literally said, "Yes the article opens with that".
You are just gaslighting now and grasping at straws.
Show me in the article where the MP is directly quoted saying Pierre is a climate change denier.

 

[Skoob]

Wow, nice mental gymnastics there.
Trudeau's rating had been tanking for like 2 years and reached a low point when Freeland quit.
Nothing to do with Trump.
Pierre capitalized on hatred for Trudeau, leveraged inflation and shot up in popularity.
But after Trump came to power he just appeared a weak leader pushing MAGA-lite.
Which is why he lost his own riding.
He needs to take responsibility for that.
As for Trump preferring Carney, it is to take credit as usual.
As if he is king maker.
But he said this before Pierre's fortunes tanked.
So does he actually prefer Carney?

Trudeau's rating had been tanking slowly. Then when Trump won the election, he started turning on his own party and this resulting in his ratings plummeting more. Strangely enough, his approval rating started going up in Dec up to March hitting the same point (47%) as it was in Feb 2021. I guess people liked him more after he resigned? Proof that Liberals are just confused.

The "Trump-lite" thing is proof of the brainwashing the Liberal campaign has done on you. Poilievre always pushed back against Trump. He has never endorsed him and has publicly stated this many times. Even Trump didn't like him.

You are a classic brainwashing victim.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Trudeau's rating had been tanking slowly. Then when Trump won the election, he started turning on his own party and this resulting in his ratings plummeting more. Strangely enough, his approval rating started going up in Dec up to March hitting the same point (47%) as it was in Feb 2021. I guess people liked him more after he resigned? Proof that Liberals are just confused.

The "Trump-lite" thing is proof of the brainwashing the Liberal campaign has done on you. Poilievre always pushed back against Trump. He has never endorsed him and has publicly stated this many times. Even Trump didn't like him.

You are a classic brainwashing victim.

Trudeau's rating when Trump won was sub 30%.
It was 43% in 2022 Dec, and had been declining steadily since then.
So, it is untrue that Trudeau's ratings had anything to do with Trump.
The Liberal gained a lead over conservatives after Carney took over, and Trump announced Tariffs.
Pierre was still talking about 2 genders or whatever MAGA-lite talking points of the day.
Hence he lost.
And what about the video that I posted are you refuting?

 

[squeezer]

Your "so what" response only makes you look even more hypocritical (if that's even possible).

I will say it again, Justin was to soft on the twats!

No silly, I didn't say it was Carney's fault that GM is laying off all those people...I asked you what Carney is going to do about it? That's the reason why he won the election right? To "stand up to Trump".

So? What's he going to do?

ps have you ever thought for a second that Trump "is smitten" over Carney because he knows how easily it will be able to control him? (Trump loves people like you!)

Oh I see, so this is the first face-to-face meeting since Carney officially got the mandate to represent Canada and actually took his seat. Meanwhile, does Pee Pee even have a seat in the House? Just checking.


It’s hilarious—you keep demanding to know what Carney’s going to do before he’s even had a proper sit-down with your beloved clown. Honestly, how can anyone possibly develop a strategy before meeting the human headline himself?


But please, do go on parroting the same tired lines while blindly defending your clown Trumputin—it’s so impressively predictable, it’s almost an art form. Truly, you make it far too easy.