Better than you do as proven over and over again.You still don't understand federal and provincial jurisdictions.
Better than you do as proven over and over again.You still don't understand federal and provincial jurisdictions.
We weren't discussing deficits or healthcare or education, etc etc.I already stated the facts about the deficits, the state of the Healthcare, and Education under DOFO, but you keep on being in denial.
Typical Skoob!!
It was specifically about a comment about DoFo being the worst premier in Ontario. In terms of public opinion, that would not be the case.Just because Wynne was bad or even worst, doesn't mean that Ford is not bad for the province.
Like I said...quick to make excuses and then quick to praise.When the economies of practically every single country around the Globe has been hit by the Covid-19 Pandemic, supply chain disruptions, the war in Russia, Global inflation, Climate Change hits on crops etc., yet you have no problem with pushing all the blame on the Trudeau Government for Canada also being affected by it. But now when Canada has the one of the best inflation figures, as well as being forecasted to have the best growth of the G7 Nations, a triple A rating, once again you would give no credit to the present Federal Government, but just your hatred no matter what.......LOL!!
But the actual fact is that Canada has a better credit rating than several of the G7 Nations including the USA, and the Inflation is lower than most G7 Nations.Like I said...quick to make excuses and then quick to praise.
"forecasted" does not mean it has actually happened. You are basing your view on speculation.
An article quoting the press release is still just using the press release, skoob.I already shared 3rd party sources that outline how the contracts the Liberals signed would have translated into $million of unnecessary costs. Don't like what I provided? Like I said file a FOI request and get your own. Don't be lazy.
Highway 413 was an election promise and needed. All other parties said they would cancel it if elected. They weren't elected. The people have spoken in our democracy. Why do you hate democracy?
Even the feds support it.
OMG!Like I said...quick to make excuses and then quick to praise.
"forecasted" does not mean it has actually happened. You are basing your view on speculation.
Those contracts were terrible. If DoFo had signed those contracts instead of the Libs you would have had a stroke.An article quoting the press release is still just using the press release, skoob.
You need an independent source that looked into the issue to see if there were any savings at all.
Not someone else posting the DoFo presser.
None of which addresses what I said. And I never said that Ford was the worst. I said he was bad for the province. You were the one who felt the need to use superlatives.It was specifically about a comment about DoFo being the worst premier in Ontario. In terms of public opinion, that would not be the case.
Other than public opinion, "the worst" is very subjective. So consensus based on public opinion, ie polls, would be the measure in that context.
If you bothered to actually do your own research you would find that the figure is based on the commitments the stupid contracts the Liberals signed would have cost the province based on energy we don't need.OMG!
So DoFo 'forecasts' $700 million in savings from energy not purchased and you say that happened.
Then you post this?
Skoob own goal!
I never said you said Ford was the worst. I'm saying that "best" or "worse" are subjective terms based on opinion. And if more people believe someone was the worst, then that would be the measure in terms of opinion.None of which addresses what I said. And I never said that Ford was the worst. I said he was bad for the province. You were the one who felt the need to use superlatives.
Of course it's subjective but it's no different than saying he's a good premier. No different than saying Wynne was worse.Saying Ford is "bad" for the province is also subjective and a very broad statement.
Actually, it most definitely does not. 1)I made no comparison, implied or otherwise. 2)It's possible that I feel that everyone is bad.That would imply that someone else was good for the province as to have something to compare with.
Are you saying there is no pleasing you and if there is, no one has been able to meet your expectations?Of course it's subjective but it's no different than saying he's a good premier. No different than saying Wynne was worse.
Actually, it most definitely does not. 1)I made no comparison, implied or otherwise. 2)It's possible that I feel that everyone is bad.
Poor logic.
A 9 year old report by the Fraser Institute?Those contracts were terrible. If DoFo had signed those contracts instead of the Libs you would have had a stroke.
They were all part of the Liberal's failed green energy scheme that cost everyone more.
Thank god they were cancelled by the grownups in the room.
Do the math...
Auditor general report sheds more light on Ontario's soaring electricity costs
• Consumers have paid $9.2 billion more for renewables under the current 20-year contracts than they would have had to under Ontario’s previous program of renewable procurement.
• Ontario’s guaranteed prices in 2014 for wind and solar are approximately double and three and a half times the current average U.S. costs, respectively.
• Using non-hydro renewables to reduce electricity-sector carbon emissions costs approximately $257 million for each megatonne of emissions reduced (Ontario’s estimated 2012 emissions were 167 megatonnes).
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/blo...e-light-on-ontarios-soaring-electricity-costs
You've posted a DoFo press release and the media posting that press release and its projection.If you bothered to actually do your own research you would find that the figure is based on the commitments the stupid contracts the Liberals signed would have cost the province based on energy we don't need.
Cost avoidance based on power generation through the multi-year contracts.
There's this thing called math you should look into.
No. It's a hypothetical example to prove that your supposition is wrong when you say that if I say that Ford is bad, automatically implies that someone else is good. There is no such implication. Ford is bad for Ontario means that Ford is bad for Ontario. Nothing more and nothing less.Are you saying there is no pleasing you and if there is, no one has been able to meet your expectations?