Pickering Angels

Munk Debate on Zionism

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
1,711
1,455
113
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
6,898
4,625
113
Geno, I thought that I was the worst. You've always liked bc the best.:cry:
I mean BC is no Steel Panther, but their first to albums Bodycount and Born Dead were pretty good and even afterword they have some good tunes.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
88,810
21,062
113
Democracy is a term relating to a free election to determine who governs. Every citizen gets to vote. Apartheid is a term that describes how some citizens are discriminated against by governmental policy compared to other citizens and has nothing to do with who or how a person or party comes into power.

They are two separate topics.
Yes, and when the indigenous population are not considered 'citizens' and instead are internationally recognized as 'stateless refugees' living on their own land, then its apartheid.

Denying Palestinians citizenship is proof of apartheid, Shazi.

Killing the entire native population won't solve your problems, Shazi.
Neither will recreating Auschwitz for 2 million people.


 
  • Angry
Reactions: Klatuu

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
88,810
21,062
113
The UN said UNCONDITIONALLY.

Do you understand English? It means that the UN doesn't give a shit about what's going on around them.

Are you saying NOW that we shouldn't listen to what the UN says? Are you changing your policy regarding statements from the UN?
The UN also said Israel has to cease fire, Shazi.
The ICJ also ordered Israel to prevent the killing of all Palestinians in Gaza, allow all aid through and charge those for inciting genocide.
Inciting genocide carries a 5 year sentence in Canada, by the way.

And yet here you are still inciting genocide.
Israel has clearly failed to obey the UN as well.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
1,711
1,455
113

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
6,898
4,625
113
Not a fair comparison. Nobody is Steel Panther.
The are lyrical geniuses and understand that Death to all Butt Metal is the only way to go.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: southpaw

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
50,345
9,386
113
Toronto
Yes, and when the indigenous population are not considered 'citizens' and instead are internationally recognized as 'stateless refugees' living on their own land, then its apartheid.

Denying Palestinians citizenship is proof of apartheid, Shazi.
Every sovereign country in the world has the autonomy to decide on who they wish to bestow citizenship.

It's not apartheid. It's international law.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
88,810
21,062
113
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

southpaw

Well-known member
May 21, 2002
1,711
1,455
113
Every sovereign country in the world has the autonomy to decide on who they wish to bestow citizenship.
Indeed. Most Gulf States have strict laws on who can or cannot be a citizen. They don't bullshit the world by calling themselves "democracies".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
50,345
9,386
113
Toronto
The UN also said Israel has to cease fire, Shazi.
Don't change the topic.

You are agreeing that the UN told Hamas to return the hostages, unconditionally. That means that what Israel does is irrelevant to Hamas returning the hostages. It is NOT a condition for disobeying the order. Orders to Hamas are independent of orders to Israel. They are not linked. So, let's talk about Hamas first and then we'll talk about Israel.

Hamas has not returned the hostages from Oct.7. First, you condemn Hamas for disobeying the UN orders. After that, Israel.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
50,345
9,386
113
Toronto
History and facts show that Black South Africans did not have citizenship rights before 1948 when the National Party came to power and the apartheid era began. Black South Africans did not have the right to vote,
How many times can you be so wrong? From Wiki:

Segregation of coloured voters In 1951 Parliament passed the Separate Representation of Voters Act, which removed coloured voters from the common voters roll

This is documented history and it is contrary to your claims. You are clearly ignorant in regards to this history. Education is more important than your self-admitted anti-Semitism if you want to win a debate on the topic.

The exact same thing happens in Palestine.
You now know that this is wrong. Unlike the blacks in S. Africa, Palestinians have NEVER had the right to vote and were NEVER citizens. Those things never existed. As the old blues men used to sing, "You can't lose what you ain't never had."

Hence, it is exactly the same thing that happened in South Africa, and it IS Apartheid.
Totally different situations as per your newfound education. Hence there is no apartheid against certain/Arab Israeli citizens.

Now coming to the UNGA resolution, show me an international law, that states, that for Apartheid (which is a crime under international law), to be considered to exist, it needs a UNGA resolution first.
All I have to show is that the UN passed a resolution in 1963 against S. African apartheid, which I've previously done. They have not done so with Israel. If the UN felt Israel was guilty of apartheid, history (there's that inconvenient word for you) shows that they would pass a resolution saying so.

Well, there is none. Same with genocide.
More than one topic at a time is too much for you. We were already talking about apartheid and now you're throwing in genocide. As such genocide is irrelevant for this discussion. Don't be like Geno.

Your post displays a profound lack of logic, or fact. As I said, I have educated you above. Take some time to go through the actual history (not your own imaginations), and correct yourself.Yes, by people like me. And your posts are a product of conveniently ignoring people who educate you.Now it is clear why your posts are so completely lacking in logic or fact. You conveniently ignore actual facts and ignore people who fact check you. I was raised with values, where they taught me that "with age comes wisdom". I no longer believe this to be true. You are one of the case studies why.
I dont have to worry about myself, because although I have a lot of support from actual sensible members on this board, I never resort to relying on them as I am confident in my own posts. You could name them if you like. After all you need the support. But as I have said multiple times, you and your ol' buddies, that people laugh at, or what you guys rant on about at the early bird special, is frankly, irrelevant.
You never fail to amaze me how flawed and adolescent your arguments are. I'm not going to lower myself to your level and embarrass myself the way you do to yourself. My opinion of you is backed up by at least a handful of intelligent, educated and respected posters. I can understand why you don't want to list Amoeba and Geno as proof of your deficit in intellect, grasp of logic and being factually accurate.

History shows that blacks had a vote but it was taken away by apartheid. You need to change history to prove your point.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
50,345
9,386
113
Toronto
Indeed. Most Gulf States have strict laws on who can or cannot be a citizen. They don't bullshit the world by calling themselves "democracies".
Seriously? That is idiotic.

The actual reason that they don't called themselves democracies is because they are monarchies. Hahahahahaha.

That is the most STOOPID statement I've ever read. But thanks for the laugh and reaffirming my statement that every sovereign state has the right to decide who becomes citizens and that Israel has the same right. You agree that Geno's claim that Israel MUST bestow citizenship on Palis/Gazans is patently false.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
88,810
21,062
113
Don't change the topic.

You are agreeing that the UN told Hamas to return the hostages, unconditionally.
Its the same subject, Shazi.
Why on earth would you think only one side has to abide by the UNSC resolutions?

Hamas isn't even a state or UN member, the UN has no jurisdiction on them.
Israel is a member and as such is the party that must abide by UNSC resolutions.
As a member they must also abide by ICJ provisional measures.

Even so, Hamas sent in a letter saying they'd abide and Israel has refused to do so.

Instead, Netanyahu declared he's more interested in some kind of final solution.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
88,810
21,062
113
That is the most STOOPID statement I've ever read. But thanks for the laugh and reaffirming my statement that every sovereign state has the right to decide who becomes citizens and that Israel has the same right. You agree that Geno's claim that Israel MUST bestow citizenship on Palis/Gazans is patently false.
Israel has the choice to remain apartheid just as the world had a choice in sanctioning South Africa to end apartheid.
Israel had a choice to commit genocide and continue the occupation.

You just have to accept the consequences of turning zionism into the new nazis.


 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
50,345
9,386
113
Toronto
Why on earth would you think only one side has to abide by the UNSC resolutions?
I didn't say that. They are 2 different countries and take different actions and as such, they require different commentaries. There are many times that you've discussed Israel without mentioning Hamas.

What is your commentary on Hamas as a single entity defying UN orders? Or are you too afraid to criticize them? (Actually, that's a rhetorical question. We know you won't. You do not have the integrity to tell the truth.)
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
50,345
9,386
113
Toronto
Hamas isn't even a state or UN member, the UN has no jurisdiction on them.
Which means that they can kill and rape with impunity. That also shows that your calls to send both sides to the ICJ is just bullshit. Sending Hamas to court means nothing.

You are never honest and every post/tweet/picture are fraudulent. You continually lie and I just proved it about your call to send Hamas to court.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
50,345
9,386
113
Toronto
Israel has the choice to remain apartheid just as the world had a choice in sanctioning South Africa to end apartheid.
Yes, the UN lead that charge by passing the 1963 resolution against S. African apartheid.

Why aren't they doing that now with Israel? Until they do so this proves that your claims of Israeli apartheid are bullshit. You need to start being honest.
 
Toronto Escorts