You should be praising Piers for bringing both sides on. I know you only want the Hamas terrorist narrative but Piers is being very fair in his coverage.
Piers had his work cut out for him in this interview,lol....
You should be praising Piers for bringing both sides on. I know you only want the Hamas terrorist narrative but Piers is being very fair in his coverage.
Those leaflets will do nothing when images of starving Palestinians eventually come out.
Why are you so emphatic on getting people to say that this is an Israeli war crime and that is an Israeli war crime.I have always said "it doesn't matter" because per international law, attacking human shields, is a war crime. So "passing the human shield test" makes no difference.
You have. Which is why it was easy to tell early on that you were anti-Israel/anti-Semitic right from the get-go. You were never neutral. It was a facade.Go back 300 pages when I was supporting military action by Israel. I called Israel a racist, oppressive and apartheid state. I have always called Israel racist, oppressive and apartheid state even before October 7. Go to the old "anti-Zionism is anti-semitism thread, if I am right, and I called Israel a racist, oppressive and apartheid state. Only now, I have more information about the kind of state it is, and you do as well. So an anti-Israel position, is infact the right moral position.
It was a one-time thing. I forget what the discussion was about, but when he brought it up he referred to the Israelis as defenders. My reply was, that proves that Hamas are the aggressors.I heard him say that Israel is an occupying state, and that it is in an offensive position, and therefore does not have a right to self-defense. I do not remember reading where he called Israelis "defenders". Quote him. If not this will be Example #3 of your lying and gaslighting.
There you go once again blaming Israel for everything. It's like Hamas had no other option than to kill the 1,200-1,400 civilians. You are justifying and thereby endorsing their actions. Israel had been obeying the ceasefire that was already in place. And you are saying that it was OK for Hamas to break it.The Israelis do not require such considerations. They are safe. October 7, wouldn't have happened if 2 things had happened: a) The larger issue had been addressed regarding Palestinian freedoms. b) Israel's security forces had not failed.
Yes you can condemn two separate things. But when you condemn something you are saying that there is no justification for it. There are no buts. It's an absolute. You can't say you condemn Oct. 7 and in the same breath talk about oppression etc. That is double speak.You can condemn terrorism and condemn Israeli oppression of the Palestinian people. Those are both compatible arguments and are not justifications for each other.
Yup. It's ALL on Israel. It always has been and always will be for people like you.Yes, so Israel should use it to address the larger issue that has led to this point.
I'm sure the 1400 that Hamas murdered would have appreciated some warning, and the opportunity to be elsewhere.Aww how sweet of them to drop leaflets of impending doom.
75 years of occupation since the Nabka, now we are in the middle of Nabka 2.0.Yup. It's ALL on Israel. It always has been and always will be for people like you.
It's all on Israel.
You’re saying it as if it’s a bad thing75 years of occupation since the Nabka, now we are in the middle of Nabka 2.0.
Its all on Israel.
Every single death is the result of a foreign colonial movement occupying Palestine, refusing to respect international law and UN resolutions and refusing to end the illegal occupation.
Every single death.
![]()
You're saying that as if you were a nazi.You’re saying it as if it’s a bad thing
How could you not know this?Bomb threat at my son's former Jewish day school on Bathurst near Viewmount Ave. today. School was evacuated for the police investigation and sweep of the building.
Have many Muslim institutions in Toronto have been similarly harassed?
So why didn't the Israeli government take the warnings coming from Egypt seriously?I'm sure the 1400 that Hamas murdered would have appreciated some warning, and the opportunity to be elsewhere.
I did not know that. I am not on their mailing list, nor did I hear about that on the CTV news. Whereas I am on the UJA Security mailing list.How could you not know this?
![]()
Police evacuate Vaughan community centre after potential threat
The building was evacuated, and officers in York Region conducted a search of the area. No injuries were reported.toronto.citynews.ca
Oh I know, it’s not about you.
Of course, anyone in the media or government who isn't on board completely supporting Hamas and throwing stones at Israel is the enemy in your world at the moment.Next you'll be saying even handed tucker carlson is.
You're saying that the day after Veltman was pronounced guilty.Bomb threat at my son's former Jewish day school on Bathurst near Viewmount Ave. today. School was evacuated for the police investigation and sweep of the building.
Have many Muslim institutions in Toronto have been similarly harassed?
It's happening on both sides.Bomb threat at my son's former Jewish day school on Bathurst near Viewmount Ave. today. School was evacuated for the police investigation and sweep of the building.
Have many Muslim institutions in Toronto have been similarly harassed?
Don't be silly. They would not have attacked that hospital unless they were 1000% fucking sure there were tunnels in there.That's an admission that there were no tunnels in the hospital.
That they've been killing people there for nothing.
I haven't seen anyone in the media supporting Hamas. Why would they?Of course, anyone in the media or government who isn't on board completely supporting Hamas and throwing stones at Israel is the enemy in your world at the moment.