Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
The other posters who also got banned and had to create new identities. LOL
Please explain when Hamas hides rocket launchers, factories, arms and headquarters under/within hospitals, schools and residential districts you can destroy them without destroying said buildings?
You don't even understand what I'm appalled by, do you?
The tactical argument that there will be civilian casualties isn't it.
You saying it is right and proper to commit war crimes is.
so you are afraid to answer the question. No explanation required. It is yes or no.
There have been about 55 UN resolutions against Israel, all of which were vetoed by the US. If the Palestinians have no recourse it will just lead to more terrorism and with the advent of cheap drones it will get worse as time goes on.
The US needs to stop vetoing and let the UN do its job to relieve some of the stress of the pressure cooker.
In the long term, the land has to be repartitioned with the border running along the latitude so it is short, and a DMZ put in place. Ideally, it would be a 50/50 split but given the powerlessness of the Palestinians, 70/30 with the 70 going to Israel would be reasonable.
The US needs to stop vetoing and let the UN do its job to relieve some of the stress of the pressure cooker.
In the long term, the land has to be repartitioned with the border running along the latitude so it is short, and a DMZ put in place. Ideally, it would be a 50/50 split but given the powerlessness of the Palestinians, 70/30 with the 70 going to Israel would be reasonable.
Murder was what hamas did in their terror attack on the 7th where they explicitly trained for and targeted Israeli civilians. You celebrated that.
The deaths of Gaza civilians is tragic but they are casualties of war, not murdered. And no moral person is celebrating Israel's response.
Wait. You've claimed Hamas unguided rockets are actually self defence. You've claimed that targeting of Jewish civilians in the West Bank is okay because in your words, you can't tell them apart.
The groups you pretend to support have been clear those are war crimes but you keep on claiming they're okay.
And look at Frank continuing to blame Israel for hamas choosing to butcher civilians by going door to door.
Ah, the patented Franky move of making up bullshit to try and justify his hatreds.
p.s. based on your refusal to listen to Palestinians and your claims that they are incapable of being responsible for their choices, seems like you consider Arabs to be animals.
This was Israel butchering 'human animals', basketcase.
11 days with no food, water or power for 2.2 million people, 50% of whom are children.
Last edited:
You have yet to be able to either state where the borders of Israel lie or whether Palestinians have basic human rights.
Israel has killed 1524 children so far.
Palestinians did not choose to live under a 54 year old occupation.
Nor did they choose to live through apartheid or in the world's largest death camp.
well, they kind of did when they rejected Israel's generous offer of citizenship in the newly minted country of Israel.
I'm stating that Hamas hasn't give a choice. So under those specific circumstances, where your enemy leaves no choice for your own survival, then they are justified.
Because the war crime imo isn't in the destruction, its in the placement that creates the situation. Hamas does it on purpose, they WANT civilian casualties. They prefer martyrs to mouths to feed. That's who they are.
So yes the tactical question matters, because unless you can give another option, you are promoting Hamas's tactics as humane.
That was the one with free unicorns and balloons, wasn't it?
