In other words Hamas does not agree to a sovereign Jewish state because they only support full right of return and the 1967 borders. No concession whatsoever.My error, yes the 1988 charter is bad. I meant the updated charter which I thought was the 1988 charter. Its not, its this one from 2017:
Hamas in 2017: The document in full
Hamas explains general principles and objectives in 42-article documentwww.middleeasteye.net
In it they clearly state that if a Palestinian majority supported it, they would back the two state solution based on the 1967 borders.
Hamas believes that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. However, without compromising its rejection of the Zionist entity and without relinquishing any Palestinian rights, Hamas considers the establishment of a fully sovereign and independent Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital along the lines of the 4th of June 1967, with the return of the refugees and the displaced to their homes from which they were expelled, to be a formula of national consensus.
The peace process will never progress unless Hamas is removed from the equation.