What baffles me about this discussion is that everyone here is involved in a hobby that, if we were found out, we would be sanctioned for if we were members of a professional body. Indeed, much of society would view the participants of this hobby as amoral, unethical, addicts, mentally ill and criminals. We are all, at the very least ethical failures, if we accept mainstream views and yet here we are condemning Peterson. What's the difference? He's a loud mouth and courageous about beliefs and we hide behind fake names and do it on the down low. We may disagree with his views and his style but who here is openly and actively challenging our society's view on sex work?