Come on, are you going to rat me out to Peterson?Don't squeeze one out while you're in there.
Jordan Peterson says Ontario psychologist licence may be suspended over public statements
- Thread starter Knuckle Ball
- Start date
What baffles me about this discussion is that everyone here is involved in a hobby that, if we were found out, we would be sanctioned for if we were members of a professional body. Indeed, much of society would view the participants of this hobby as amoral, unethical, addicts, mentally ill and criminals. We are all, at the very least ethical failures, if we accept mainstream views and yet here we are condemning Peterson. What's the difference? He's a loud mouth and courageous about beliefs and we hide behind fake names and do it on the down low. We may disagree with his views and his style but who here is openly and actively challenging our society's view on sex work?
Again, all you have to do is do a google search. Women have had a clear bias against working for other women. I don't make these things up.
I think you read something far beyond what is in the words. As with mandrill, study after study, poll after poll, women have a preference working for men. You can't dismiss it. It ain't going away. Sorry that reality clashes with your idealism. Humans are well.......humans.
If you follow the thread, I was responding to Knuckle Ball's statement "Try telling people in daily life that women are inferior leaders compared to men. Make sure you include some women when sharing these views." So my point was while a woman might project herself to be a leader, she is likely to prefer not working for another women. So that in itself is interesting relative to Knuckle Ball's statement.
Now as far as agencies, I really have no idea what "agencies" you are talking about. I'm sure there are successful female managed agencies. However, that wasn't really the point, but you weren't really following the thread.........were you?
By the way, I have worked for women. It usually goes very well.
Last edited:
Nonsense. Right now I work for a client, whose leadership are ALL women. And they've sort of formed a sorority and infact prefer to recruit and work with women.
Okay. But if any of us could make 5 or 10x our annual professional salary by transitioning into a "public sex work client crusader", we all would in a second.
And most of us would be honest and state what we believe and feel to be true and leave it at that. Doc Pee - OTOH - hoovers up a shopping list of grievances from Ben Shapiro and Andy Ngo and spouts them holus-bolus. There is no way that he believes ALL of that stuff uncritically and without nuance or reservation. He is selling himself to the rightie ideological consumer base like 1,000 other social media denizens. They all spout the same ideas. They all appear on each other's shows and websites and cheer each other on. It's a group effort grift. If they break ranks, they run the risk of breaking the spell for all of them.
If Doc Pee just went on a tedious obscure psych podcast and gave voice to some tedious abstruse psych theories, he'd be untouchable. Just another egghead doing egghead shit. The CPO would clap him on the back. It's the fact that he goes on Rogan and whatever other rightie popular show and rants about vaccines and "woketards" - the same way they ALL do - but with the edge of him being introduced and celebrated as an "intellectual brilliant professor" that brings him down. It's a rule breaker and it's also really trashy and a cash grab. The CPO's got him figured out and they don't like his hustle. Nor should they.
I spoke to you about "Libs of Tiktok" and told you that those are flakes and not representative of liberal ideas. You continue to obsessively read the site however.
Libs of TikTok is a far right, Twitter account run by this Karen called Chaya Raichik. She just bitches about liberals and whoever she perceives as woke all day long. Hence why orry is on that account.
Actually she never''bitches'' about anything........She helps progressives spread their message.
She posts the dumbest, most ludicrous stuff out there - stuff no actual liberal would take seriously for a second - and pretends that it's genuine liberal content.
And you take it at face value and believe it.
Hahaha!
You have the same tenacious and argumentative spirit that Peterson has!! Maybe you should! I'd support you as a sex work crusader!!
Jordan Paterson is simply Milo for intelligent people.....but he is still a provocateur, no matter how he's sliced....
Conrad Black is a dick and always will be.....he has already been "thrown out like a dead mouse".....Jordan Peterson for PM !!! Fuck Justin the Groper. The college of psychologists are going after him because he called Justin Groper a puppet. I hope he sues the fuck out of them. This all from a bunch of liberals that support the teachers to show children how to be Trans at school.
Jordan Peterson asks Ontario court to review disciplinary proceedings that violate free speech
Jordan Peterson asks Ontario court to review disciplinary proceedings that violate free speech
The disciplinary proceedings against his conduct violate the charter, Peterson argues in an application for judicial review filed in Ontarionationalpost.com
Conrad Black: Defamatory charges against Jordan Peterson should be 'thrown out like a dead mouse'
This proceeding is a disgrace, an outrage and an affront to every thinking and civilized person in Canada
Conrad Black: Defamatory charges against Jordan Peterson should be 'thrown out like a dead mouse'
This proceeding is a disgrace, an outrage and an affront to every thinking and civilized person in Canada
You have to report speeding fines... can you imagine if you were arrested or if someone reported that you were a john? You guys have no clue how intrusive and problematic professional standards are and you miss the point. Canadian society does not condone sex work, a professional college's mandate is to protect the public and hold professional to a higher standard of conduct than regular folks. Community standards are enshrined in these regulations and members are held to a higher standard because they are professionals.
I don't have an example but if a member of the public complains about your behavior, the complaint will be investigated and if you are found in violation of some standard you can be sanctioned... just like Peterson.
So, don't piss off a SP or let anyone know what you're do if you want avoid censure if you are a member of a professional college. Also, you would be surprised to see how an apparently insignificant complaint can turn into a nightmare.
So yes, I'm sure there are anecdotes of women working well together. Again, that's not the point. I am just citing very common and repeated polls of women and their preferences.
So again, I am just responding to Knuckle Ball. In the abstract, woman support female leaders. Personally, they have a bias against working for a woman. As I said in my response to KB, it's complicated.
Last edited:
I'm sorry, feel free to look it up yourself, try Google. If you break the law, you get in trouble with your professional associations... what don't you get?
