Jordan Peterson says Ontario psychologist licence may be suspended over public statements

[Pleasure Hound]

Jordan Paterson is simply Milo for intelligent people.....but he is still a provocateur, no matter how he's sliced....

 

[Pleasure Hound]

Jordan Peterson for PM !!! Fuck Justin the Groper. The college of psychologists are going after him because he called Justin Groper a puppet. I hope he sues the fuck out of them. This all from a bunch of liberals that support the teachers to show children how to be Trans at school.


Jordan Peterson asks Ontario court to review disciplinary proceedings that violate free speech

Jordan Peterson asks Ontario court to review disciplinary proceedings that violate free speech

The disciplinary proceedings against his conduct violate the charter, Peterson argues in an application for judicial review filed in Ontario

nationalpost.com

Conrad Black: Defamatory charges against Jordan Peterson should be 'thrown out like a dead mouse'
This proceeding is a disgrace, an outrage and an affront to every thinking and civilized person in Canada

Conrad Black: Defamatory charges against Jordan Peterson should be 'thrown out like a dead mouse'

This proceeding is a disgrace, an outrage and an affront to every thinking and civilized person in Canada

nationalpost.com

Conrad Black is a dick and always will be.....he has already been "thrown out like a dead mouse".....

 

[Leimonis]

Hahaha!

You have the same tenacious and argumentative spirit that Peterson has!! Maybe you should! I'd support you as a sex work crusader!!

name a case in Canada where a professional was sanctioned for prostitution

 

[alwilm]

I am not at all convinced that this is accurate.

Name one example please.

You have to report speeding fines... can you imagine if you were arrested or if someone reported that you were a john? You guys have no clue how intrusive and problematic professional standards are and you miss the point. Canadian society does not condone sex work, a professional college's mandate is to protect the public and hold professional to a higher standard of conduct than regular folks. Community standards are enshrined in these regulations and members are held to a higher standard because they are professionals.

I don't have an example but if a member of the public complains about your behavior, the complaint will be investigated and if you are found in violation of some standard you can be sanctioned... just like Peterson.

So, don't piss off a SP or let anyone know what you're do if you want avoid censure if you are a member of a professional college. Also, you would be surprised to see how an apparently insignificant complaint can turn into a nightmare.

 

[WyattEarp]

Nonsense. Right now I work for a client, whose leadership are ALL women. And they've sort of formed a sorority and infact prefer to recruit and work with women.

So yes, I'm sure there are anecdotes of women working well together. Again, that's not the point. I am just citing very common and repeated polls of women and their preferences.

So again, I am just responding to Knuckle Ball. In the abstract, woman support female leaders. Personally, they have a bias against working for a woman. As I said in my response to KB, it's complicated.

 

[alwilm]

name a case in Canada where a professional was sanctioned for prostitution

I'm sorry, feel free to look it up yourself, try Google. If you break the law, you get in trouble with your professional associations... what don't you get?

 

[dirtyharry555]

I spoke to you about "Libs of Tiktok" and told you that those are flakes and not representative of liberal ideas. You continue to obsessively read the site however.

The content is representative. The content that you see on that page becomes mainstream liberal politics in the years that follow.

 

[squeezer]

I'm sorry, feel free to look it up yourself, try Google. If you break the law, you get in trouble with your professional associations... what don't you get?

When you make a statement it is up to you to prove your statement. Don't be a lazy misinformation spreader!!!!

 

[The Oracle]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615398624665473024

Here's a new one,lol...

These SJW's just continue to push the limits of dumb...

 

[alwilm]

When you make a statement it is up to you to prove your statement. Don't be a lazy misinformation spreader!!!!

Honestly, I'm so tired of this thread... not why I joined TERB.

I don't have the arguementative staying power that some of you do! I'm getting old!!

 

[squeezer]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615398624665473024

Here's a new one,lol...

These SJW's just continue to push the limits of dumb...

You just gave lingering Johns an idea of how to stay past their one-hour appts.

 

[squeezer]

Honestly, I'm so tired of this thread... not why I joined TERB.

I don't have the arguementative staying power that some of you do! I'm getting old!!

Exercise, take your vitamins, and fuck lots of hot young ladies. This will energize you and allow you to participate with links and all.

 

[WyattEarp]

She posts the dumbest, most ludicrous stuff out there - stuff no actual liberal would take seriously for a second - and pretends that it's genuine liberal content.

And you take it at face value and believe it.

Yeah! She's a grifter!!

 

[Frankfooter]

If you actually would read my words on the page I rarely speak in absolutes. You challenged my original statement "I just don't know if anything he says or advocates is really black and white a violation of his profession." So after 362 posts debating the nature of Peterson's professional violations you thought you would offer a challenge to me personally of "You don't accept the findings of the CPO, who know the profession and what Peterson said?" Apparently, quite a few members don't Frank.

I'm actually not quite sure why I am singled out as the beneficiary of such banality. Sometimes I think I am the only conservative who doesn't have you on ignore.

Well, Wyatt, its all to do with your answers and phrasing, where you asked 'is it wrong to question authority' when I asked you about the CPO findings.
When you said 'I just don't know' that was likely the most accurate answer from you but the question then becomes, if you want to question authority and don't know or understand the CPO findings why didn't you do some research?
Valcazar and I have both posted links to the CPO statements, you can find the CPO website and standards if you looked and you could have checked out other sources.
Instead, after 400 posts in this thread about the subject you come out as someone who has strong opinions yet won't do the basic research to find out if those opinions are justified.

And yes, lots of right wingers go all cancel culture when they find don't do well in debates. Lots of people who argue for free speech also seem to be the first to want to ban people or stifle their free speech.

 

[Leimonis]

You have to report speeding fines... can you imagine if you were arrested or if someone reported that you were a john? You guys have no clue how intrusive and problematic professional standards are and you miss the point. Canadian society does not condone sex work, a professional college's mandate is to protect the public and hold professional to a higher standard of conduct than regular folks. Community standards are enshrined in these regulations and members are held to a higher standard because they are professionals.

I don't have an example but if a member of the public complains about your behavior, the complaint will be investigated and if you are found in violation of some standard you can be sanctioned... just like Peterson.

So, don't piss off a SP or let anyone know what you're do if you want avoid censure if you are a member of a professional college. Also, you would be surprised to see how an apparently insignificant complaint can turn into a nightmare.

Name a professional organization that obligates you to report speeding fines.

 

[mandrill]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615398624665473024

Here's a new one,lol...

These SJW's just continue to push the limits of dumb...

You must spend 10 or 12 hours a day reading this stuff.

 

[mandrill]

The content is representative. The content that you see on that page becomes mainstream liberal politics in the years that follow.

I'm looking forward to the tiktok which says "punctuality is a symptom of white supremacist" thinking becoming mainstream. Then I can sleep in and I can ignore 9:00 AM court.

 

[WyattEarp]

Instead, after 400 posts in this thread about the subject you come out as someone who has strong opinions yet won't do the basic research to find out if those opinions are justified.

Frank, I have been reading and I have been questioning. After 360 something posts in this thread, you have to do better than the experts at COP have spoken. Where are you in this thread? The whole thread has been those who challenge the COP and those who support them.

And yes, lots of right wingers go all cancel culture when they find don't do well in debates. Lots of people who argue for free speech also seem to be the first to want to ban people or stifle their free speech.

Huh? You challenged me and I firmly explained why I thought you were errantly tracking me for whatever reason you have rationalized. I can't help you if you think people are trying to ban you or stifle you.

As always, you and all of us would do well to stay in the conversation as much as possible and not get over our skiis trying to challenge specific members for various motivations.

 

[Frankfooter]

Frank, I have been reading and I have been questioning. After 360 something posts in this thread, you have to do better than the experts at COP have spoken. Where are you in this thread? The whole thread has been those who challenge the COP and those who support them.



Huh? You challenged me and I firmly explained why I thought you were errantly tracking me for whatever reason you have rationalized. I can't help you if you think people are trying to ban you or stifle you.

As always, you and all of us would do well to stay in the conversation as much as possible and not get over our skiis trying to respond to specific members.

Wyatt, I posted the CPO findings and you (or it could have been someone else, it was a couple of hundred posts ago) asked why I would post something boring and off topic.
That is the level of discourse here from the Peterson supporters.

Over 400 posts and not one went to the CPO website, press releases or findings to try to actually understand what is the CPO position.
Imagine if they dedicated the same amount of time as say, 200 posts, to doing basic research.

They wouldn't just be arguing whether or not its ok to question authority, they could specifically state 'JP said this, the CPO says this, the CPO is wrong'.
Instead its just:

Are you trying to say it's wrong to ask questions of authority?

 

[WyattEarp]

Wyatt, I posted the CPO findings and you (or it could have been someone else, it was a couple of hundred posts ago) asked why I would post something boring and off topic.
That is the level of discourse here from the Peterson supporters.

Over 400 posts and not one went to the CPO website, press releases or findings to try to actually understand what is the CPO position.
Imagine if they dedicated the same amount of time as say, 200 posts, to doing basic research.

They wouldn't just be arguing whether or not its ok to question authority, they could specifically state 'JP said this, the CPO says this, the CPO is wrong'.
Instead its just:

You yourself could cite specific instances that the COP noted and make your case. That doesn't mean everyone is going to agree with your findings. That's the nature of public discourse.

And no, I didn't say anything criticizing your posting of CPO findings. I have found the COP supporters to be generally vague. I hear a lot about how much money Peterson's making.