In the 21st century, anti-Zionism means anti-Semitism

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,985
2,898
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Are you implying that the 17.8% that voted NDP in the last election are antisemites?
Same with the 2.3% that voted green?
That's 1/5 Canadians voting for parties that are now calling out Israeli apartheid.

Your views that Israel doesn't have to honour human rights is that of an extreme minority in Canada now.

why do you keep slandering and lying about my posts? i never said the NDP voters are antisemites.


you always run the mods when you accuse others and lying about your posts
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,741
22,210
113
why do you keep slandering and lying about my posts? i never said the NDP voters are antisemites.


you always run the mods when you accuse others and lying about your posts
You've accused every other person who criticizes Israeli apartheid as 'antisemites'.
I'm just curious to see if there is an actual limit to who you will slander.

Is this criticism antisemitic or legit criticism of the state of Israel?

New Democrats are asking the Liberal government to:

  1. respond to reports from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Israeli human rights NGOs and the United Nations and accept their recommendations to states
  2. refer the killing of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh to the International Criminal Court
  3. increase pressure on the Israeli government to stop its plan to annex Palestinian territory in violation of international law
  4. condemn the construction of illegal settlements, demolitions of Palestinian homes in the West Bank, and evictions from East Jerusalem, including Sheikh Jarrah
  5. call on Israel to end forcible displacement of villagers in Masafer Yatta
  6. increase funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) which supports Palestinian refugees
  7. condemn Israel’s undemocratic nation-state law
  8. condemn the Israeli government’s attacks on civil society in Israel and Palestine, including the recent designation of six Palestinian human rights groups as “terrorist”
  9. condemn the ongoing blockade of Gaza and increase Canadian humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza
  10. condemn military detention of Palestinian children, and reaffirm support for the Convention on the Rights of the Child
  11. vote for Palestinian human rights at the United Nations
  12. end all trade and economic cooperation with illegal settlements in Israel-Palestine
  13. suspend the bilateral trade of all arms and related materials with the State of Israel until Palestinian rights are upheld
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,985
2,898
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
You've accused every other person who criticizes Israeli apartheid as 'antisemites'.
I'm just curious to see if there is an actual limit to who you will slander.

Is this criticism antisemitic or legit criticism of the state of Israel?


my criticism are based on documented facts like news reports and facts which can be found using google searching. your problem is you refuse to read anything you don't like. and instead post links and sources which are linked to terrorists and antisemities
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,741
22,210
113
my criticism are based on documented facts like news reports and facts which can be found using google searching. your problem is you refuse to read anything you don't like. and instead post links and sources which are linked to terrorists and antisemities
Ah, that's the talk I expect from you.
You've accused Amnesty, HRW, B'tselem, the UN, Yesh Din, Bishop Desmond Tutu and a host of others of 'links to terrorists and antisemites'.
(of course you refuse to read those reports)

But when the NPD demands the same things the above agencies say, and the same things I've been saying, you won't call them 'antisemites'?
Interesting, maybe you do have limits.

How about when an Israeli cabinet member says:
“What acts like apartheid, is run like apartheid and harasses like apartheid, is not a duck – it is apartheid.”

Antisemite?

How about when an Israeli newspaper says Israel is apartheid?
Are they antisemites?

How about when 25% of US Jews say Israel is apartheid?
Are they antisemites?


How do you draw the line and where is it?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,985
2,898
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Ah, that's the talk I expect from you.
You've accused Amnesty, HRW, B'tselem, the UN, Yesh Din, Bishop Desmond Tutu and a host of others of 'links to terrorists and antisemites'.
(of course you refuse to read those reports)

But when the NPD demands the same things the above agencies say, and the same things I've been saying, you won't call them 'antisemites'?
Interesting, maybe you do have limits.

How about when an Israeli cabinet member says:
“What acts like apartheid, is run like apartheid and harasses like apartheid, is not a duck – it is apartheid.”

Antisemite?

How about when an Israeli newspaper says Israel is apartheid?
Are they antisemites?

How about when 25% of US Jews say Israel is apartheid?
Are they antisemites?


How do you draw the line and where is it?

franky likes to lie about my post how about showing terbites his posts where you cite sources link to terrorists and known anti-semites and defend anti-semitic hate crimes against jews




quoting the Palestinian Centre for Human Right who are linked to the PLPF terrorist organization







quoting btselem an anti-semitic website who was caught hiring holocaust deniers



racist towards me saying blacks cannot defend israel ignoeing the fact that over 180,000 black people reside in israel which includes 25,000
black americans. quoting jewish voice for peace that supports terrorism and was busted citing neo nazi and white supremacists websites





claiming that black persons cannot support Israel that have over 180,000 black people living there







justifying terrorists attacks against israeli and jewish civilians














supports the anti-jewish vandalizing of a business owned by a Jewish man and making excuses for it







promoting the ethnic cleansing of Jews from the region.







apologist for hamas the terror group






defending the PLFP terror group




refuses to condemn anti-jewish hate crimes commited by anti-jewish gangs







refuses to condemn the anti-semitic attacks on jewish shoppers at a supermaket in Thornhill, Ontario Canada.




franky continues to sink deeper and deeper into anti-jewish terrorism. franky defends a mapping project in Massacheusets
anti-jewish activists create a list of jewish organzations for anti-semitic purposes



more anti-black racism





supports and defend anti-semitic actions at the University of Wisconsin




franky butturt at the definition of anti-semitism because he is one





franky defends a terrorist that was killed in a shootout with the IDF





defends hamas claiming that it is islamophobic to call hamas terrrorists



defending an anti-semitic terror supporting rally




defending a terrorist attack against a security guard(security guards are civilians)



still refuses to condemn hamas





post anti-black racism to deflect rom his support for terrorists and anti-jewish hate crimes



justified the murder of a security guard



franky resorts to slander defending the Fatah organization who admitted that they are a terrorist organization




continue to lie and slander



still lying and slander


 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,741
22,210
113
franky likes to lie about my post how about showing terbites his posts where you cite sources link to terrorists and known anti-semites and defend anti-semitic hate crimes against jews
We went through that list before, each one is slander and a lie.
Feel free to pick one post and we can do a sample again, not that it'll change you.

Guess I'll have to repeat this since you got all panicky about answering.

You've accused Amnesty, HRW, B'tselem, the UN, Yesh Din, Bishop Desmond Tutu and a host of others of 'links to terrorists and antisemites'.
(of course you refuse to read those reports)

But when the NPD demands the same things the above agencies say, and the same things I've been saying, you won't call them 'antisemites'?
Interesting, maybe you do have limits.

How about when an Israeli cabinet member says:
“What acts like apartheid, is run like apartheid and harasses like apartheid, is not a duck – it is apartheid.”

Antisemite?

How about when an Israeli newspaper says Israel is apartheid?
Are they antisemites?

How about when 25% of US Jews say Israel is apartheid?
Are they antisemites?


How do you draw the line and where is it?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,985
2,898
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
We went through that list before, each one is slander and a lie.
Feel free to pick one post and we can do a sample again, not that it'll change you.

Guess I'll have to repeat this since you got all panicky about answering.

You've accused Amnesty, HRW, B'tselem, the UN, Yesh Din, Bishop Desmond Tutu and a host of others of 'links to terrorists and antisemites'.
(of course you refuse to read those reports)

But when the NPD demands the same things the above agencies say, and the same things I've been saying, you won't call them 'antisemites'?
Interesting, maybe you do have limits.

How about when an Israeli cabinet member says:
“What acts like apartheid, is run like apartheid and harasses like apartheid, is not a duck – it is apartheid.”

Antisemite?

How about when an Israeli newspaper says Israel is apartheid?
Are they antisemites?

How about when 25% of US Jews say Israel is apartheid?
Are they antisemites?


How do you draw the line and where is it?



dude quit repeating yourself it is annoying and only shows you have nothing to say


What does it mean when someone keeps repeating themselves in an argument?



Lance Appolonaire


they are parroting memorized talking points and its the only thing they have to offer.
they don’t know the topic well so they can’t come up with anything independently, only regurgitate what they’ve memorized from others.
stop the discussion… they aren’t prepared and its a waste of your time
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,741
22,210
113
dude quit repeating yourself it is annoying and only shows you have nothing to say


What does it mean when someone keeps repeating themselves in an argument?

Lance Appolonaire

they are parroting memorized talking points and its the only thing they have to offer.
they don’t know the topic well so they can’t come up with anything independently, only regurgitate what they’ve memorized from others.
stop the discussion… they aren’t prepared and its a waste of your time
Good point, CM.
How many times have you copy and pasted the same list of posts?
I'd say at least a dozen times in this thread.
I did it once in reply to your copy and paste.

So stop it.

There were over 1000 terrorist attacks by Israeli settlers in 2022.
Are you really against terrorism or just against Palestinians?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,985
2,898
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Israeli Security Forces Thwarted Bombing Attack Planned by Gaza Terrorists


24News – The Shin Bet domestic security agency said on Monday that it had thwarted a bombing attack in Israel directed by terrorist operatives from the Gaza Strip.

“At the end of an operation that lasted several weeks led by the General Security Service in cooperation with the IDF (Israeli military), on December 14 a terrorist infrastructure that planned bomb and suicide attacks in Israeli territory was thwarted,” the agency’s statement said.



As part of the operation, the Shin Bet and the IDF arrested a number of terrorist operatives, “who were acting under the direction of the ‘Resistance Committees’ organization and the ‘Shahadaa Al-Aqsa’ organization,” referring to terrorist organizations operating in the Gaza Strip.

The Israeli forces also seized an “explosive device” that was set to be used in a “significant terrorist attack in Israel.”



The operation focused on a number of known terrorist operatives from the Gaza Strip, headed by Ahmad Fathi Omar Hajjaj, a resident of Jabaliya, who is known as an expert in the production of explosives.

“The many intelligence products obtained from the operational activity led to the disclosure of the identities of other terrorist masterminds from the Gaza Strip, including: Maha Ladawi (resident of Nizirat), who helped recruit threats to the infrastructure and worked together with Jahad Ahmed, Zabri Muhammad Zabri Aram and Iman Yosef Khalil Zakot (residents of Rafah),” the agency said.

In addition, a number of suspects were arrested for investigation by the Shin Bet due to their involvement in promoting the terrorist activity that was exposed. Among them were Yunes Odeh, Khaled Marai, Ahmad Taher Jaradat and Kis Elshaib. The operation was carried out as part of the “long-running campaign that the General Security Service maintains together with the IDF and the Israel Police to thwart terrorism in the territories of Israel using a variety of methods and tools.”

“The State of Israel takes very seriously the terrorist activity directed from the Gaza Strip to the West Bank and Israel and works to thwart any threat ahead of time, and considers the Hamas organization to be responsible for all terrorist activity from the Gaza Strip,” the Shin Bet stated.


Outgoing Prime Minister Yair Lapid praised the security forces for the successful operation.

“I congratulate the Shin Bet, the IDF and the police for intelligence and operational activity that led to the arrest of terrorist squads — the long hand of the State of Israel will reach anyone who tries to harm the citizens of Israel,” he said.

“The war against terrorist infrastructures and terrorists continues every day, in all sectors — the security forces continue to act all the time to thwart any attempt to harm us. The struggle is not over — the State of Israel works all the time, with zero tolerance against terrorism. This is the only way we can allow a routine of life alongside a stubborn struggle,” he added.

Israeli Security Forces Thwarted Bombing Attack Planned by Gaza Terrorists | Jewish & Israel News Algemeiner.com
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,741
22,210
113
Israeli Security Forces Thwarted Bombing Attack Planned by Gaza Terrorists
Over 1000 settler terrorist attacks you refuse to acknowledge.
Why?

Another typical small scale terrorist attack.

This is settler colonialism, CM.
Are you for or against it?

 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,454
6,702
113
This fits your definition of terrorism:
...
Bullshit. People attacking a border are not entitled to protection. Cases where actually peaceful civilians were targeted should be investigated. And that is far different than the official policy from Hamas which sees all Jews in Israel as legitimate targets.

And still you refuse to even admit there is such a thing as terrorism from Palestinians. I'll stick with Canada's definition thank you.
 
Last edited:

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,454
6,702
113
I fully support taking Palestinians and Israelis to the ICC based on investigations on Amnesty reports.
...
Would be believable if you weren't continually arguing against Amnesty when they say Gaza rockets are completely unjustified and being a Jew in the West bank doesn't make one a legitimate target.


p.s. I know you like posting statements from random Jews so I'll reciprocate with a Canadian Arab who's statements are pretty close to my feelings.


The direction that the expected new Israeli government promised to take sounds pretty awful: Lifting a ban on racist MKs, political interference in the judiciary, more settlements and possibly annexation, anti-LGBT legislations, gender-segregated public events, and so on.

One might think that we’re reading the program of the Iranian regime, but no, this is Israel, the liberal democracy that we have been defending for decades. Will it still be a liberal democracy in a year or two?


Considering this, it is fair to ask whether supporting Israel still makes sense.

As someone who supports both Israel’s right to exist and the Palestinian right to self-determination, the answer is obvious: yes. We certainly can continue to support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state and to defend itself, and we should.


If we stopped supporting a cause the moment that its main proponents started acting in ways we do not agree with, we would never have supported the Palestinian right to self-determination. But both rights deserve to be supported on their own merits, not based on how some individuals act on them.

The Palestinians’ inability to act ethically has hurt their own cause more than it has hurt Israel, and the new Israeli direction is likely to hurt Israel more than it will hurt the Palestinians. The Palestinians have long needed to be told this, but any warnings to this effect have fallen on deaf ears. Now the upcoming Israeli government is equally ignoring warnings, even when the warnings come from Israelis themselves.

I have long advocated that Arabs need to learn from Israel and behave more like Israelis. Now I am disappointed to see that the reverse is happening. It is Israel that is learning to behave more like Arab states. While Israel has succeeded so far and has prospered thanks to pragmatic policies, it is now adopting dogmatism and tribalism as its guides, just as Arab states have done for a long time.

But despite this, when Israel is attacked, it has the right to defend itself, regardless of whether the prime minister is Naftali Bennett, Yair Lapid, Benjamin Netanyahu, or even, God forbid, Itamar Ben-Gvir or Bezalel Smotrich.

After all, the Palestinians have not lost their rights based on who leads them.

But while Israel loses no fundamental rights, by adopting far-right policies, support for Israel is likely to weaken, and more importantly, the far-right policies contemplated for the West Bank are likely to lead to Israel’s self-destruction by turning it into a de-facto binational state.

So, one could argue that whether we continue to support Israel or not may not matter in the end. As we’ve learned with the Palestinians, you cannot force people to act in their own best interests.

But I believe that it matters. The type of support that Israel receives is particularly important. Too much of Israel’s support now comes from the American Christian right, and not enough comes from the left, yet the left has not abandoned the Palestinians despite decades of Palestinian terrorism. Is it a surprise then that Israelis have felt let down by the left and have turned increasingly to right-wing parties?

We can choose a more ethical and proportional approach.

We can choose to stand by our own stated principles even when it’s hard. We can choose to support Israelis who are protesting in the streets against the upcoming coalition. We can also choose to support the right to life and liberty of Israelis who voted for the far right. It’s not an easy path, but it’s the correct path.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,454
6,702
113
...

Another typical small scale terrorist attack.
...
Yet you still refuse to describe Palestinians throwing rocks, firebombs, or shooting at Israeli vehicles as terrorism, even when groups like Lions Den proudly take credit for the attacks on social media.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,741
22,210
113
Bullshit. People attacking a border are not entitled to protection. Cases where actually peaceful civilians were targeted should be investigated. And that is far different than the official policy from Hamas which sees all Jews in Israel as legitimate targets.

And still you refuse to even admit there is such a thing as terrorism from Palestinians. I'll stick with Canada's definition thank you.
The UN investigated and says the protests were civilian and legit.
In the commission’s view, the demonstrations were civilian in nature, had clearly stated political aims and, despite some acts of significant violence, did not constitute combat or a military campaign.
By your own definition, this was terrorism.

The Gaza prison wall is not a border of any recognized country. Its just that, a prison wall. Protesting against an illegal occupation, apartheid rule and 'the world's largest open air prison' is about as justified as you can get for protests.
Shooting them every Friday for a full year is terrorism, targeting civilians to terrorize a population.
Israel used snipers using butterly bullets, or dum dums, for maximum damage to civilians.
They intentionally shot knees and legs, crippling thousands of civilians.

For you to deny that this is terrorism puts you on worse moral footing than Hamas.

Frankly I find your defence of this year long, weekly act of terrorism disgusting.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,741
22,210
113
Would be believable if you weren't continually arguing against Amnesty when they say Gaza rockets are completely unjustified and being a Jew in the West bank doesn't make one a legitimate target.


p.s. I know you like posting statements from random Jews so I'll reciprocate with a Canadian Arab who's statements are pretty close to my feelings.


The direction that the expected new Israeli government promised to take sounds pretty awful: Lifting a ban on racist MKs, political interference in the judiciary, more settlements and possibly annexation, anti-LGBT legislations, gender-segregated public events, and so on.

One might think that we’re reading the program of the Iranian regime, but no, this is Israel, the liberal democracy that we have been defending for decades. Will it still be a liberal democracy in a year or two?


Considering this, it is fair to ask whether supporting Israel still makes sense.


As someone who supports both Israel’s right to exist and the Palestinian right to self-determination, the answer is obvious: yes. We certainly can continue to support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state and to defend itself, and we should.

If we stopped supporting a cause the moment that its main proponents started acting in ways we do not agree with, we would never have supported the Palestinian right to self-determination. But both rights deserve to be supported on their own merits, not based on how some individuals act on them.


The Palestinians’ inability to act ethically has hurt their own cause more than it has hurt Israel, and the new Israeli direction is likely to hurt Israel more than it will hurt the Palestinians. The Palestinians have long needed to be told this, but any warnings to this effect have fallen on deaf ears. Now the upcoming Israeli government is equally ignoring warnings, even when the warnings come from Israelis themselves.

I have long advocated that Arabs need to learn from Israel and behave more like Israelis. Now I am disappointed to see that the reverse is happening. It is Israel that is learning to behave more like Arab states. While Israel has succeeded so far and has prospered thanks to pragmatic policies, it is now adopting dogmatism and tribalism as its guides, just as Arab states have done for a long time.

But despite this, when Israel is attacked, it has the right to defend itself, regardless of whether the prime minister is Naftali Bennett, Yair Lapid, Benjamin Netanyahu, or even, God forbid, Itamar Ben-Gvir or Bezalel Smotrich.

After all, the Palestinians have not lost their rights based on who leads them.

But while Israel loses no fundamental rights, by adopting far-right policies, support for Israel is likely to weaken, and more importantly, the far-right policies contemplated for the West Bank are likely to lead to Israel’s self-destruction by turning it into a de-facto binational state.

So, one could argue that whether we continue to support Israel or not may not matter in the end. As we’ve learned with the Palestinians, you cannot force people to act in their own best interests.

But I believe that it matters. The type of support that Israel receives is particularly important. Too much of Israel’s support now comes from the American Christian right, and not enough comes from the left, yet the left has not abandoned the Palestinians despite decades of Palestinian terrorism. Is it a surprise then that Israelis have felt let down by the left and have turned increasingly to right-wing parties?

We can choose a more ethical and proportional approach.


We can choose to stand by our own stated principles even when it’s hard. We can choose to support Israelis who are protesting in the streets against the upcoming coalition. We can also choose to support the right to life and liberty of Israelis who voted for the far right. It’s not an easy path, but it’s the correct path.
I assume, since you posted this, you must agree with his assessment, that Israel is headed towards self destruction caused by their own policies.
But while Israel loses no fundamental rights, by adopting far-right policies, support for Israel is likely to weaken, and more importantly, the far-right policies contemplated for the West Bank are likely to lead to Israel’s self-destruction by turning it into a de-facto binational state.

So, one could argue that whether we continue to support Israel or not may not matter in the end. As we’ve learned with the Palestinians, you cannot force people to act in their own best interests.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,741
22,210
113
Yet you still refuse to describe Palestinians throwing rocks, firebombs, or shooting at Israeli vehicles as terrorism, even when groups like Lions Den proudly take credit for the attacks on social media.
When Palestinians target civilians its terrorism.
When settlers are armed and backed by the IDF they are no longer civilians, as noted by the UN.

Now the question is how can any Palestinian tell the difference between a civilian, unarmed, settler and an armed militant settler.
Do they have uniforms?

How can you tell which ones were part of the over 1000 terrorist attacks by militant settlers from the civilian ones?
As the UN said:

“Armed and masked Israeli settlers are attacking Palestinians in their homes, attacking children on their way to school, destroying property and burning olive groves, and terrorising entire communities with complete impunity,” said the experts. 2022 is the sixth year of consecutive annual increase in the number of Israeli settler attacks in the occupied West Bank, despite a 2016 UN Security Council resolution specifically intended to halt settlement activity.

“Disturbing evidence of Israeli forces frequently facilitating, supporting and participating in settler attacks, makes it difficult to discern between Israeli settler and State violence,” said the experts. “The impunity of one is reinforced by the impunity of the other.”


According to the terms you prefer, if Palestinians target settlers and think they are militants its not terrorism.

The best answer is to get Amnesty, the UN and others to investigate all violence by both sides so they can charge whoever is committing terrorism.
On both sides.

You should support full investigations by the ICC on both parties, if you are really against terrorism.
I'm against terrorism by both sides and think we should bring in the UN and the ICC to investigate and lay charges as warranted.
That's the only way to end terrorism.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,985
2,898
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Students for Justice in Palestine lies in order to memorialize terrorists



(December 25, 2022 / JNS) While cities like Jerusalem, Hebron and Jenin are well-known as frontlines of the Arab-Israeli conflict, North American college campuses are a theater of another type of war.

Anti-Zionist student groups and faculty members routinely use the language of “social justice,” “liberation” and “resistance” to whitewash the heinous actions of Palestinian terror groups that vow to destroy the State of Israel and take the lives of Israelis in and out of uniform.


On Nov. 23, the Students for Justice in Palestine chapter at Georgetown University posted a carousel on Instagram that featured the profiles of 16 “young Palestinians killed by Israeli forces.”

Derived from posts by the anti-Zionist propaganda group Palestinian Youth Movement, the carousel listed names, photos and a brief “description” that presented the individuals as innocent victims of the IDF.

Cursory research, however, reveals a likely reason for Georgetown SJP’s omission of certain details regarding the deaths of these individuals: Of the 16 people listed, 12 were directly involved in acts of terror:


  • Mahdi Hashash was killed when he attempted to throw an explosive device during a visit by members of Knesset to Joseph’s Tomb.
  • Ali Antar, Mishal Baghdadi, Wadee Al-Hawah, Hamdi Qayyem and Hamdi Sharaf were armed members of the Lion’s Den terrorist group. They were killed in an intense firefight on Oct. 25 when the IDF raided the group’s headquarters and explosives factory. The Lion’s Den is thought to be responsible for the murder of an Israeli soldier and attempts to plant bombs in Jaffa and Kedumim.

  • Qusay Tamimi was killed after he threw a bomb at Israeli forces during a protest related to the raid on the Lion’s Den headquarters.

  • Tamer al-Kilani was a senior member of the Lion’s Den. At the time of his death, several attacks he planned had been foiled. He was also involved in shooting incidents around Nablus.

  • Oday al-Tamimi, also spelled “Udai Tamimi,” shot and killed 18-year-old IDF soldier Noa Lazar at a checkpoint near Jerusalem’s Shuafat neighborhood. Tamimi attempted to carry out another attack but was killed by security forces after he opened fire near the entrance to Ma’aleh Adumim.

  • Adel Dawoud, also spelled “Daoud,” was killed by Israeli forces after he threw a Molotov cocktail at troops stationed near the security barrier around Qalqilya.

  • Khaled Anbar and Salameh Sharayah were killed by Israeli forces after attempting to ram soldiers with a car during an arrest raid.
This isn’t the first time SJP has engaged in such egregious deception. In March, the SJP chapter at UMass Amherst hosted a vigil that memorialized members of Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, presenting them as “martyrs.” For context, these terror groups appear on the same list as Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

To whitewash the actions of these so-called “martyrs” at Georgetown, UMass or any other campus is to deny and erase the darkest chapters of Israeli history—the first and second intifadas, which took place from 1987-1993 and 2000-2005. During these two Palestinian terror campaigns, thousands of Israelis were killed in suicide bombings, stonings, stabbings and shootings, including numerous women and children.

Georgetown SJP’s “activism” in defense of Palestinian terrorism is yet another example of the growing hostility and bigotry directed at Jewish and Israeli students on college and university campuses across the United States.

Such efforts are more organized than they may appear. As 2021-2022 CAMERA fellow Aidan Segal wrote, “The ideological heirs to the 20th century’s eliminationist strain of antisemitism don’t wear their predecessors’ jackboots and black shirts. They don’t goosestep, nor do they “sieg heil”—at least not always. Instead, they wear the deceptively hospitable masks of civil rights activists—holding crude, modern imitations of the Wannsee Conference, airing out their genocidal fantasies under the politically appealing banner of Palestinian liberation.”

In a Jerusalem Post editorial published in May 2022, Segal exposed incidents in which chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine and far-left group Jewish Voice for Peace—which maintained a chapter at Georgetown for some time—collaborated with Samidoun, an organization with ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a U.S.-designated terrorist organization.

Samidoun spreads propaganda with the same messaging as Georgetown SJP’s Nov. 23 post. It attempts to justify acts of terrorism and dismisses them as a form of “resistance” and “martyrdom.” In a Dec. 20 post, for example, the group offered a “salute” to Nasser Abu Hmeid, a founding member of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, who was responsible for the deaths of seven Israelis during the second intifada.

Georgetown University President John J. DeGioia must address the bigotry espoused by anti-Israel student groups on campus. Ultimately, attempts by SJP to pass off individuals who commit acts of terror against Jews and Israelis as “martyrs” isn’t just disingenuous, it’s a thinly veiled justification for a genocidal assault on Jews.

Is this the message that Georgetown wants its students to espouse?

Adam Gordon is a Campus Advisor for CAMERA on Campus covering New England, the Southeastern United States and Canada.

Students for Justice in Palestine lies in order to memorialize terrorists - JNS.org
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,741
22,210
113
Students for Justice in Palestine lies in order to memorialize terrorists



(December 25, 2022 / JNS) While cities like Jerusalem, Hebron and Jenin are well-known as frontlines of the Arab-Israeli conflict, North American college campuses are a theater of another type of war.

Anti-Zionist student groups and faculty members routinely use the language of “social justice,” “liberation” and “resistance” to whitewash the heinous actions of Palestinian terror groups that vow to destroy the State of Israel and take the lives of Israelis in and out of uniform.


On Nov. 23, the Students for Justice in Palestine chapter at Georgetown University posted a carousel on Instagram that featured the profiles of 16 “young Palestinians killed by Israeli forces.”

Derived from posts by the anti-Zionist propaganda group Palestinian Youth Movement, the carousel listed names, photos and a brief “description” that presented the individuals as innocent victims of the IDF.

Cursory research, however, reveals a likely reason for Georgetown SJP’s omission of certain details regarding the deaths of these individuals: Of the 16 people listed, 12 were directly involved in acts of terror:


  • Mahdi Hashash was killed when he attempted to throw an explosive device during a visit by members of Knesset to Joseph’s Tomb.
  • Ali Antar, Mishal Baghdadi, Wadee Al-Hawah, Hamdi Qayyem and Hamdi Sharaf were armed members of the Lion’s Den terrorist group. They were killed in an intense firefight on Oct. 25 when the IDF raided the group’s headquarters and explosives factory. The Lion’s Den is thought to be responsible for the murder of an Israeli soldier and attempts to plant bombs in Jaffa and Kedumim.

  • Qusay Tamimi was killed after he threw a bomb at Israeli forces during a protest related to the raid on the Lion’s Den headquarters.

  • Tamer al-Kilani was a senior member of the Lion’s Den. At the time of his death, several attacks he planned had been foiled. He was also involved in shooting incidents around Nablus.

  • Oday al-Tamimi, also spelled “Udai Tamimi,” shot and killed 18-year-old IDF soldier Noa Lazar at a checkpoint near Jerusalem’s Shuafat neighborhood. Tamimi attempted to carry out another attack but was killed by security forces after he opened fire near the entrance to Ma’aleh Adumim.

  • Adel Dawoud, also spelled “Daoud,” was killed by Israeli forces after he threw a Molotov cocktail at troops stationed near the security barrier around Qalqilya.

  • Khaled Anbar and Salameh Sharayah were killed by Israeli forces after attempting to ram soldiers with a car during an arrest raid.
This isn’t the first time SJP has engaged in such egregious deception. In March, the SJP chapter at UMass Amherst hosted a vigil that memorialized members of Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, presenting them as “martyrs.” For context, these terror groups appear on the same list as Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

To whitewash the actions of these so-called “martyrs” at Georgetown, UMass or any other campus is to deny and erase the darkest chapters of Israeli history—the first and second intifadas, which took place from 1987-1993 and 2000-2005. During these two Palestinian terror campaigns, thousands of Israelis were killed in suicide bombings, stonings, stabbings and shootings, including numerous women and children.

Georgetown SJP’s “activism” in defense of Palestinian terrorism is yet another example of the growing hostility and bigotry directed at Jewish and Israeli students on college and university campuses across the United States.

Such efforts are more organized than they may appear. As 2021-2022 CAMERA fellow Aidan Segal wrote, “The ideological heirs to the 20th century’s eliminationist strain of antisemitism don’t wear their predecessors’ jackboots and black shirts. They don’t goosestep, nor do they “sieg heil”—at least not always. Instead, they wear the deceptively hospitable masks of civil rights activists—holding crude, modern imitations of the Wannsee Conference, airing out their genocidal fantasies under the politically appealing banner of Palestinian liberation.”

In a Jerusalem Post editorial published in May 2022, Segal exposed incidents in which chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine and far-left group Jewish Voice for Peace—which maintained a chapter at Georgetown for some time—collaborated with Samidoun, an organization with ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a U.S.-designated terrorist organization.

Samidoun spreads propaganda with the same messaging as Georgetown SJP’s Nov. 23 post. It attempts to justify acts of terrorism and dismisses them as a form of “resistance” and “martyrdom.” In a Dec. 20 post, for example, the group offered a “salute” to Nasser Abu Hmeid, a founding member of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, who was responsible for the deaths of seven Israelis during the second intifada.

Georgetown University President John J. DeGioia must address the bigotry espoused by anti-Israel student groups on campus. Ultimately, attempts by SJP to pass off individuals who commit acts of terror against Jews and Israelis as “martyrs” isn’t just disingenuous, it’s a thinly veiled justification for a genocidal assault on Jews.

Is this the message that Georgetown wants its students to espouse?

Adam Gordon is a Campus Advisor for CAMERA on Campus covering New England, the Southeastern United States and Canada.

Students for Justice in Palestine lies in order to memorialize terrorists - JNS.org
According to your article that wasn't terrorism as all of those attacks were targeting military targets. Sorry, CM, that is just the native population resisting an illegal occupation through force. Its not terrorism and its not a war crime.
Its violence and it would be far better if the violence from both sides ended, along with the occupation and apartheid.
But its not terrorism.

Do you think Palestinians have the right to self defence from an illegal occupation, or is that another right you don't think they deserve under apartheid rule?

Once again, you are using the word 'terrorist' as the new 'n' word.
As a racial slur.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,985
2,898
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
According to your article that wasn't terrorism as all of those attacks were targeting military targets. Sorry, CM, that is just the native population resisting an illegal occupation through force. Its not terrorism and its not a war crime.
Its violence and it would be far better if the violence from both sides ended, along with the occupation and apartheid.
But its not terrorism.

Do you think Palestinians have the right to self defence from an illegal occupation, or is that another right you don't think they deserve under apartheid rule?

Once again, you are using the word 'terrorist' as the new 'n' word.
As a racial slur.
Every time franky lie and slander me I will display his anti semitic and terror apologist postings


franky likes to lie about my post how about showing terbites his posts where you cite sources link to terrorists and known anti-semites and defend anti-semitic hate crimes against jews




quoting the Palestinian Centre for Human Right who are linked to the PLPF terrorist organization







quoting btselem an anti-semitic website who was caught hiring holocaust deniers



racist towards me saying blacks cannot defend israel ignoeing the fact that over 180,000 black people reside in israel which includes 25,000
black americans. quoting jewish voice for peace that supports terrorism and was busted citing neo nazi and white supremacists websites





claiming that black persons cannot support Israel that have over 180,000 black people living there







justifying terrorists attacks against israeli and jewish civilians














supports the anti-jewish vandalizing of a business owned by a Jewish man and making excuses for it







promoting the ethnic cleansing of Jews from the region.







apologist for hamas the terror group






defending the PLFP terror group




refuses to condemn anti-jewish hate crimes commited by anti-jewish gangs







refuses to condemn the anti-semitic attacks on jewish shoppers at a supermaket in Thornhill, Ontario Canada.




franky continues to sink deeper and deeper into anti-jewish terrorism. franky defends a mapping project in Massacheusets
anti-jewish activists create a list of jewish organzations for anti-semitic purposes



more anti-black racism





supports and defend anti-semitic actions at the University of Wisconsin




franky butturt at the definition of anti-semitism because he is one





franky defends a terrorist that was killed in a shootout with the IDF





defends hamas claiming that it is islamophobic to call hamas terrrorists



defending an anti-semitic terror supporting rally




defending a terrorist attack against a security guard(security guards are civilians)



still refuses to condemn hamas





post anti-black racism to deflect rom his support for terrorists and anti-jewish hate crimes



justified the murder of a security guard



franky resorts to slander defending the Fatah organization who admitted that they are a terrorist organization




continue to lie and slander

 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts