Mirage Escorts
Toronto Escorts

In the 21st century, anti-Zionism means anti-Semitism

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,544
2,724
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
another day another "Pro-Palestinian" obsessed with jews in Britain




The controversial columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown has written of Israel’s “influence” in Britain and how Labour Party members were expelled for “being pro-Palestinian”.

Ms Alibhai-Brown made the claim in a column this week for the i newspaper.

“I fear Israel is above international law and, in Britain, more influential than it has ever been,” she wrote, implicitly claiming in the very next sentence that as a result of that influence, “Several Jewish Labour Party members have reportedly been expelled from the party because they are pro-Palestinian.”

Referencing the International Definition of Antisemitism, she erroneously added that “the flawed International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which the Government has instructed universities to adopt, has already been used to inhibit legitimate criticism of Israel.”

Britain was the first country in the world to adopt the International Definition of Antisemitism, something for which Campaign Against Antisemitism and Lord Pickles worked hard over many meetings with officials at Downing Street.

The media watchdog CAMERA UK has documented a pattern of concerning statements from Ms Alibhai-Brown in her articles and social media pronouncements over the years, including a tweet from 2014 in which she wrote: “Jews were massacred by Nazis & good Germans did nothing. Now Israel massacres Gaza infants & good Israelis do nothing. Wrong lessons learnt.”

According to the Definition, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is an example of antisemitism.

Moreover, earlier this year, Ms Alibhai-Brown deployed the Livingstone Formulation in an article, in which she asserted that “These days, any criticism of Israel is deemed ‘antisemitic’.”

The “Livingstone Formulation”, named by sociologist David Hirsch after the controversial former Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, is used to describe how allegations of antisemitism are dismissed as malevolent and baseless attempts to silence criticism of Israel. In its report on antisemitism in the Labour Party, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) found that suggestions of this nature were part of the unlawful victimisation of Jewish people in the Party.

Late last year, Ms Alibhai-Brown made a similar claim, arguing in an article that “any criticism of the state [of Israel] is deemed antisemitic by apologists and diehard allies”, and suggesting that this is motivating a “purge” of Labour Party members. In the article titled “The UN is warning of spiralling violence, yet the West has forgotten the Palestinians” for the i newspaper, Ms Alibhai-Brown also wrote that “a report from Jewish Voice for Labour accused Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party of purging Jewish members who call Israel to account.” Jewish Voice for Labour is an antisemitism-denial group and sham Jewish representative organisation.

The year before that, she replied to journalist Stephen Bush’s reaction to being appointed to lead a Jewish charity’s review of racial inclusivity in the Jewish community by tweeting: “maybe ask them about the Palestinians.” The review was concerned with British Jews and was unrelated to Israel, a distinction that Ms Alibhai-Brown is apparently incapable of apprehending.

Previously Ms Alibhai-Brown also expressed her opposition to the Labour Party’s adoption of the International Definition of Antisemitism, describing the fringe minority of Jewish individuals who agreed with her as “good Jews”.

Newspapers and television broadcasters who host Ms Alibhai-Brown must think again before giving a platform to someone who takes such positions.

Inflammatory columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown writes of Israel’s “influence” in Britain and that Labour Party members were expelled for “being pro-Palestinian” (antisemitism.org)
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
84,557
19,276
113
another day another "Pro-Palestinian" obsessed with jews in Britain




The controversial columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown has written of Israel’s “influence” in Britain and how Labour Party members were expelled for “being pro-Palestinian”.

Ms Alibhai-Brown made the claim in a column this week for the i newspaper.

“I fear Israel is above international law and, in Britain, more influential than it has ever been,” she wrote, implicitly claiming in the very next sentence that as a result of that influence, “Several Jewish Labour Party members have reportedly been expelled from the party because they are pro-Palestinian.”

Referencing the International Definition of Antisemitism, she erroneously added that “the flawed International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which the Government has instructed universities to adopt, has already been used to inhibit legitimate criticism of Israel.”

Britain was the first country in the world to adopt the International Definition of Antisemitism, something for which Campaign Against Antisemitism and Lord Pickles worked hard over many meetings with officials at Downing Street.

The media watchdog CAMERA UK has documented a pattern of concerning statements from Ms Alibhai-Brown in her articles and social media pronouncements over the years, including a tweet from 2014 in which she wrote: “Jews were massacred by Nazis & good Germans did nothing. Now Israel massacres Gaza infants & good Israelis do nothing. Wrong lessons learnt.”

According to the Definition, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is an example of antisemitism.

Moreover, earlier this year, Ms Alibhai-Brown deployed the Livingstone Formulation in an article, in which she asserted that “These days, any criticism of Israel is deemed ‘antisemitic’.”

The “Livingstone Formulation”, named by sociologist David Hirsch after the controversial former Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, is used to describe how allegations of antisemitism are dismissed as malevolent and baseless attempts to silence criticism of Israel. In its report on antisemitism in the Labour Party, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) found that suggestions of this nature were part of the unlawful victimisation of Jewish people in the Party.

Late last year, Ms Alibhai-Brown made a similar claim, arguing in an article that “any criticism of the state [of Israel] is deemed antisemitic by apologists and diehard allies”, and suggesting that this is motivating a “purge” of Labour Party members. In the article titled “The UN is warning of spiralling violence, yet the West has forgotten the Palestinians” for the i newspaper, Ms Alibhai-Brown also wrote that “a report from Jewish Voice for Labour accused Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party of purging Jewish members who call Israel to account.” Jewish Voice for Labour is an antisemitism-denial group and sham Jewish representative organisation.

The year before that, she replied to journalist Stephen Bush’s reaction to being appointed to lead a Jewish charity’s review of racial inclusivity in the Jewish community by tweeting: “maybe ask them about the Palestinians.” The review was concerned with British Jews and was unrelated to Israel, a distinction that Ms Alibhai-Brown is apparently incapable of apprehending.

Previously Ms Alibhai-Brown also expressed her opposition to the Labour Party’s adoption of the International Definition of Antisemitism, describing the fringe minority of Jewish individuals who agreed with her as “good Jews”.

Newspapers and television broadcasters who host Ms Alibhai-Brown must think again before giving a platform to someone who takes such positions.

Inflammatory columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown writes of Israel’s “influence” in Britain and that Labour Party members were expelled for “being pro-Palestinian” (antisemitism.org)
Another day another pro apartheid post by someone purporting to be reporting against racism.
Another day of slandering Palestinians in defence of apartheid.

Same old, same tactic...
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,544
2,724
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Another day another pro apartheid post by someone purporting to be reporting against racism.
Another day of slandering Palestinians in defence of apartheid.

Same old, same tactic...


Franky rushing to defend a known anti-semtic individual who has ahistroy of inciting anti-jewish hatred






A statement was just released by "64 scholars denouncing the smear campaign against UN human rights rapporteur Francesca Albanese."

Of course, they have to somehow skate around the fact that she wrote that America is subjugated by the Jewish lobby, a classic antisemitic trope.

So they try to gaslight the world:
Once again, a high-ranking UN official defending the human rights of the Palestinians is being castigated, based on disingenuous allegations of antisemitism. This time, the trigger for such allegations is a statement Ms. Albanese made in 2014, excavated from a personal letter about Israel’s attack on Gaza she had shared on Facebook.

Indeed, Ms. Albanese said therein ‘America is subjugated by the Jewish lobby’. But first, she has rightly distanced herself from this inappropriate choice of words, and second, it is clear from the context of her statement that she was referring to pressure groups that are commonly referred to as the ‘Israel lobby’. Books have been written including by Jewish scholars about such groups. They legitimately exist and their influence, however effective, on American foreign policy towards Israel is real, in particular when it comes to blocking any initiatives aimed at holding Israel accountable for its inhumane treatment of the Palestinians.
When Special Rapporteur Albanese is delegitimized and stigmatized as an antisemite based on isolated and decontextualized statements, this amounts to political abuse of antisemitism, which fundamentally harms the urgent and important fight against antisemitism.
Let's look at their defense of Albanese.

First, they claim that it was "excavated" from a "personal letter" she shared. No, by definition, sharing a letter makes it an open letter, written to the world, to raise funds for UNWRA.

Then they claim that she "distanced herself" from that choice of words. Yes, but only when she was called on it - and even then, she denied that the phrase was antisemitic.

Third, they claim that in the context of the statement she was clearly talking about the "Israel lobby," not the "Jewish lobby," and that her critics are taking it out of context. This is another lie: in context, she wrote, "America and Europe, subjugated by both the Jewish lobby and the guilt for the Holocaust, remain on the sidelines and continue to condemn the oppressed - the Palestinians - who defend themselves with the only means they have..."

She is saying that Europe is "subjugated" by guilt for the Holocaust in the same breath that America is "subjugated" by the "Jewish lobby." She is saying that America and Europe are both beholden to not upsetting Jews. In context, it is very obvious that her "Jewish lobby" comment refers to Jews, not AIPAC, or else the Europe part of the sentence makes no sense.

But let's pretend that Albanese really meant "Israel Lobby," not "Jewish Lobby." It is still antisemitic - even according to these "scholars!"

You see, many of the same "scholars" who signed this letter also signed the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism, which is meant as an anti-Zionst alternative to the IHRA Working Definition. Aleida Assmann, Leora Auslander, Angelika Bammer, Omer Bartov, Peter Beinart, Michael Berkowitz, Daniel Boyarin, Jose Brunner, Stephen Clingman, Raya Cohen, Alon Confino, all signed both - and that is only through "C." There is a very large overlap between the signatories to this statement and the JDA.

Now, what does the Jerusalem Declaration say about examples of speech about Israel "that, on the face of it, are antisemitic"? The first one is, "Applying the symbols, images and negative stereotypes of classical antisemitism (see guidelines 2 and 3) to the State of Israel."

Guideline 2 says, "What is particular in classic antisemitism is the idea that Jews are linked to the forces of evil. This stands at the core of many anti-Jewish fantasies, such as the idea of a Jewish conspiracy in which “the Jews” possess hidden power that they use to promote their own collective agenda at the expense of other people. This linkage between Jews and evil continues in the present: in the fantasy that “the Jews” control governments with a “hidden hand,”...

Albanese is saying that Jews/Israelis have power over both the US and Europe, power that she is exposing in her letter. Note that she didn't say that the US and Europe are "influenced" (as the statement claims) or even "pressured" by the Lobby - she says that they are subjugated. That means that Jews/"Zionists" control the US and Europe.

Even dedicated anti-Zionists are on the record as saying that this is antisemitic - including many of the people who signed this statement!

These hypocritical scholars are ignoring their own definition of antisemitism in their zeal to exonerate Albanese.

Ironically, the JDA was written to allow people to freely attack (and boycott) Israel without being called antisemitic, but Albanese even crossed their own extraordinarily high bar for when attacking Israel is considered antisemitic.

They themselves are guilty of what they accuse Albanese's critics of: "this amounts to political abuse of antisemitism, which fundamentally harms the urgent and important fight against antisemitism."

Which shows the level of integrity of the anti-Israel crowd: Exactly zero.

(h/t GnasherJew)
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
84,557
19,276
113
Franky rushing to defend a known anti-semtic individual who has ahistroy of inciting anti-jewish hatred

See, there you go slandering yet another well respected person and the UN because they criticized Israel.

Next on the list for CM to slander:
The entire NDP party starting with Avi Lewis;
 

MrMessi

Well-known member
Mar 12, 2009
1,247
67
48
Why are you so afraid you describe what your solution for the Israeli Palestinian conflic is?
pot meets kettle all of your sources promotes antisemitism and many are liked to terrorists and terror organizations
Terrorism is very subjective, what america and it’s Allie’s did to the people of Iraq is no shy of terrorism, raped, killed, tortured innocent people for political gain.

So do the real terrorists have the right to label other terrorists? Hypocrisy at its finest.

Israel-Man you have a perverse and bizarre love for the Zionist regime, seeing the blood and dead bodies of innocent children brings solace to your heart doesn’t it?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,544
2,724
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
See, there you go slandering yet another well respected person and the UN because they criticized Israel.

Next on the list for CM to slander:
The entire NDP party starting with Avi Lewis;

franky's anti-semitic and terror apologism posts



quoting the Palestinian Centre for Human Right who are linked to the PLPF terrorist organization







quoting btselem an anti-semitic website who was caught hiring holocaust deniers



racist towards me saying blacks cannot defend israel ignoeing the fact that over 180,000 black people reside in israel which includes 25,000
black americans. quoting jewish voice for peace that supports terrorism and was busted citing neo nazi and white supremacists websites





claiming that black persons cannot support Israel that have over 180,000 black people living there







justifying terrorists attacks against israeli and jewish civilians














supports the anti-jewish vandalizing of a business owned by a Jewish man and making excuses for it







promoting the ethnic cleansing of Jews from the region.







apologist for hamas the terror group






defending the PLFP terror group




refuses to condemn anti-jewish hate crimes commited by anti-jewish gangs







refuses to condemn the anti-semitic attacks on jewish shoppers at a supermaket in Thornhill, Ontario Canada.




franky continues to sink deeper and deeper into anti-jewish terrorism. franky defends a mapping project in Massacheusets
anti-jewish activists create a list of jewish organzations for anti-semitic purposes



more anti-black racism





supports and defend anti-semitic actions at the University of Wisconsin




franky butturt at the definition of anti-semitism because he is one





franky defends a terrorist that was killed in a shootout with the IDF





defends hamas claiming that it is islamophobic to call hamas terrrorists



defending an anti-semitic terror supporting rally




defending a terrorist attack against a security guard(security guards are civilians)



still refuses to condemn hamas





post anti-black racism to deflect rom his support for terrorists and anti-jewish hate crimes



justified the murder of a security guard



franky resorts to slander defending the Fatah organization who admitted that they are a terrorist organization


 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
84,557
19,276
113
franky's anti-semitic and terror apologism posts
Merry Christmas, CM, or should I wish you a happy Hannukah?
Whichever, hope you have a good day with a little less hate than usual.

Have we finally found someone you won't slander?
Avi Lewis and the NDP back 13 steps against Israeli apartheid.

Are they 'terrorist supporters' or not?
Or are they just good people trying to end apartheid?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
60,354
6,468
113
Terrorism is very subjective, ...
Not to me. Attacks targeting civilians with the goal of inciting terror. That seems pretty much how Canada defines it as well.


And why are you unwilling to share your goal for peace between Israelis and Palestinians? Are you worried that stating your opinion will earn you condemnation?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
60,354
6,468
113
Zionism is a colonial movement. To say that its antisemitic is an antisemitic trope on its own.
Not all Jews support zionism.

This is just more of your racial stereotyping of the Jewish people.
Ah, back to your attempts to delegitimize a Jewish presence in Israel. Glad I live in a country that calls out that kind of anti-semitism.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
60,354
6,468
113
Canada also says that Kahanists are terrorists.
...
Canada says Kach are terrorists. They do not say non-violent people who share some of those views are terrorists. They are just racists.

If that is the standard you follow though then I guess you're going to call much of the Palestinian political spectrum terrorists because they share some views with the terrorists of Hamas, PFLP, PIJ, and parts of Fatah.


And the racist double standard where you freak out about a fringe Israeli racist party who got 5% of the vote but are absolutely silent about the mainstream racist terrorists running Gaza and the terrorist aligned party running the West Bank.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
60,354
6,468
113
...

Amnesty is as legit as it gets, CM.
Like when Amnesty says Gaza rockets are war crimes and can't be described as self defence?
Like when Amnesty says Jews being in the West Bank doesn't not make them legitimate targets and dismisses all the justifications you use?

Of course no. In that case they are just Jewish propaganda.
 

MrMessi

Well-known member
Mar 12, 2009
1,247
67
48
Not to me. Attacks targeting civilians with the goal of inciting terror. That seems pretty much how Canada defines it as well.


And why are you unwilling to share your goal for peace between Israelis and Palestinians? Are you worried that stating your opinion will earn you condemnation?
Seems like your scared to admit that your ok with the Zionists slaughtering children aren’t you? That’s why you and Israel-Man always have counter questions when oppression from the Zionist regime is evident!
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
60,354
6,468
113
Seems like your scared to admit that your ok with the Zionists slaughtering children aren’t you? That’s why you and Israel-Man always have counter questions when oppression from the Zionist regime is evident!
Dumb stawmen to cover up for your beliefs?

Again, what is your view for the best way to resolve the Israeli Palestinian conflict? Is that too hard for you?
 

MrMessi

Well-known member
Mar 12, 2009
1,247
67
48
Dumb stawmen to cover up for your beliefs?

Again, what is your view for the best way to resolve the Israeli Palestinian conflict? Is that too hard for you?
It’s Straw Man by the way.

The entire planet knows that the Palestinian people have been oppressed for decades, crimes against humanity is the mantra of the Zionist regime.

Arresting, torturing and imprisoning innocent Palestinian children are you denying this takes place?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,544
2,724
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Merry Christmas, CM, or should I wish you a happy Hannukah?
Whichever, hope you have a good day with a little less hate than usual.

Have we finally found someone you won't slander?
Avi Lewis and the NDP back 13 steps against Israeli apartheid.

Are they 'terrorist supporters' or not?
Or are they just good people trying to end apartheid?

nobody takes the NDP seriously since Jack Layton passed away
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
84,557
19,276
113
Like when Amnesty says Gaza rockets are war crimes and can't be described as self defence?
Like when Amnesty says Jews being in the West Bank doesn't not make them legitimate targets and dismisses all the justifications you use?

Of course no. In that case they are just Jewish propaganda.
I fully support taking Palestinians and Israelis to the ICC based on investigations on Amnesty reports.
Do you?

Are are you gaslighting yet again?

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
84,557
19,276
113
nobody takes the NDP seriously since Jack Layton passed away
Are you implying that the 17.8% that voted NDP in the last election are antisemites?
Same with the 2.3% that voted green?
That's 1/5 Canadians voting for parties that are now calling out Israeli apartheid.

Your views that Israel doesn't have to honour human rights is that of an extreme minority in Canada now.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts