Brett Kavanaugh and His Accuser Say They’re Willing to Testify

Bud Plug

Sexual Appliance
Aug 17, 2001
5,069
0
0
We're actually witnessing Republicans snatch a defeat from the jaws of victory.
Predicting politics is impossible, but I understand your reasoning perfectly. What fair minded person wouldn't want a country run by Democrats like those on the Senate Judiciary Committee?
 

Bud Plug

Sexual Appliance
Aug 17, 2001
5,069
0
0
How can you not like this woman??? (***LINK NSFLefties***)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWEBYVqjEbs
The woman in your link and her drinking buddies ran a train on me when I visited her high school. I had just walked fifty miles from the beach and found her and her friends blacked out from alcohol poisoning. I don't remember much about what happened next, including how I ended up partying later that night with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, but it affected me significantly for the next several years, causing me to acquire several post graduate degrees and become enormously successful.

Please feel free to tell any political operatives you know about this in complete confidence, and don't forget to donate hundreds of thousands of dollars to my GoFundMe page.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
Ford would not have been destroyed nearly enough to give Kavanaugh comfort to not testify. He'd have to testify or face a very possible conviction.
For those who wish to view this as a criminal proceeding ---- Do remember that this would have been a juvenile crime, and IF there were any criminal case to answer to, it would STILL be a juvenile crime.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
Well good luck with that since his record was not completely open during this confirmation process. .
When you said you prefer to look at his record - I assumed you were talking about his record as a jurist.
So how is Judge Kavanaugh's record as a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia not completely transparent? Please enlighten us!
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
So Jeff Flake does not know what he is doing. Really??
And what difference does it make what my opinion is on Flake's abilities to a partisan hack like you? If he's hurting the Republicans, he's a good guy. If he's helping, he's a bad guy. You honestly believe that your transparency is invisible??? LOL!!!!
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,045
3,915
113
Be prepared to be disappointed. The investigation will not draw any conclusions. And I don't see anything coming to light.
I was not aware that you are actually psychic.

You should phone up the FBI and tell them not to bother.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,365
4,570
113
What I precisely said is that they should have delayed it by a week and to have then conducted a FBI Investigation. But off course in your Trump like opinion you think that they should have gone ahead and elected to nominate him.

Again, I was right and you were wrong.
I think because the result will be the same it's a waste of resources. But if a few need this little bit of extra theatre so be it.

Quite frankly I don't care whether he gets in or not being a Canadian. I'm enjoying the spectacle of it all. It's Congress once again that looks stupid in all of this. Completely mishandled by both Parties.

Good, hopefully more turn away from the two parties.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,005
6,927
113
And what difference does it make what my opinion is on Flake's abilities to a partisan hack like you? If he's hurting the Republicans, he's a good guy. If he's helping, he's a bad guy. You honestly believe that your transparency is invisible??? LOL!!!!
Ohhh, you are such an honest guy with no partisan beliefs. Maybe you are dreaming!! Jeff Flake clearly was not comfortable with the manner in which there was not enough evidence but all here say in this whole affair.
He rightly wants a FBI Investigation rather than the He Said / She Said sit on the fence testaments. The FBI can get to the bottom of the barrel, and so Trumpty Dumpty has ordered one. Is that okay with you, now??
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,501
4,911
113

kkelso

Well-known member
Apr 27, 2003
2,470
28
48
The woman in your link and her drinking buddies ran a train on me when I visited her high school. I had just walked fifty miles from the beach and found her and her friends blacked out from alcohol poisoning. I don't remember much about what happened next, including how I ended up partying later that night with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, but it affected me significantly for the next several years, causing me to acquire several post graduate degrees and become enormously successful.

Please feel free to tell any political operatives you know about this in complete confidence, and don't forget to donate hundreds of thousands of dollars to my GoFundMe page.
This was the best thing I've read on here all week.

KK
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,825
3,376
113
Kavanaugh morphed into Donald Trump right before our eyes.

The moral and ethical decay that lay inside and underpins this indignant, railing white-privilege elitist came a-bubbling to the surface during his testimony.

Neither the judicial temperament and objectivity nor the moral compass he possesses to be a sitting judge anywhere.
How damn stupid ^.

If you were falsely accused of something that happened when you were 17 years-old, allegations which are not supported by those the accusers name as witnesses. You had been hung out to dry, YOU wouldn't be angry and upset?
It's a tried and true tactic of a seasoned lawyers/political operatives such as Kavanaugh and Graham that when the evidence against you and/or your case becomes 'too hot' to credibly rebut you go full on 'theater of the absurd mode'. Ranting and railing about "never in my life time"; "this is most unethical"; "I am so appalled and outraged"; "this is an orchestrated conspiracy against me"; "blah, blah, blah".

Pure theatrics and over the top performances worthy not of credibility and integrity but of abject dishonesty, deflection and evasiveness pointing to a inward recognition of guilt and an outward display of cowardice and moral decay in being incapable to admit what is obvious.
 

essguy_

Active member
Nov 1, 2001
4,431
18
38
It's a tried and true tactic of a seasoned lawyer and political operative such as Kavanaugh and Graham that when the evidence against you and/or your case becomes 'too hot' to credibly rebut you go full on 'theater mode' ranting and railing about "never in my life time"; "this is most unethical"; "I am so appalled and outraged"; "this is an orchestrated conspiracy against me"; "blah, blah, blah".

Pure theatrics and over the top performances worthy not of credibility and integrity but of abject dishonesty, deflection and evasiveness pointing to a inward recognition of guilt and an outward display of cowardice and moral decay in being incapable to admit what is obvious.
I agree and stated earlier that this ridiculous emotional display by Kavanaugh should really be enough to question his confirmation. If he cannot control his partisan anger during this, the most important testimony of his life, then he should stay a lawyer and not judge at the Supreme Court level. He has clearly demonstrated that he will view the world as Democrats vs Republican and let his emotions introduce partisan bias. Of course, that is why Trump chose Kavanaugh (aka “Bart O’kavanaugh”). But nobody should pretend that his anger during these proceedings was the stuff of a suitable Supreme Court nominee.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts