Assuming you don't give a flying fuck about Syrians. If you give a flying fuck about Syrians, then you would like for them to find some sort of regime that doesn't actively murder them, the way Assad/ISIS/Hezbollah do.I have some bad news for you.
The so called "free Syrian army" and "moderate Muslims " are the same as Isis, plus or minus 10 percent.
Even Israel (which despises Assad because Assad wants the Golan Heights back) ha now changed their tune and they support Assad.
Assad has always opposed Islamo Fascism.
Well I think this is what happened: The Russian jets were flying for a long time in the area along the Turkish border that Turkey declared a no-fly zone, ignoring demand after demand from Turkey to get out of there -- because the Russians are arrogant fuckheads. The Turks then sat the watching those Russian jets and getting pissed off and got itchy for ANY excuse to shoot them down, so the second they flew over Turkish airspace shot them down. And it was only a second--the jets flew over a little strip of Turkey that juts out into Syria, they would only have been over it for seconds.101 posts on this topic and I honestly don't know what to believe.![]()
sounds like premeditated murder to me.Well I think this is what happened: The Russian jets were flying for a long time in the area along the Turkish border that Turkey declared a no-fly zone, ignoring demand after demand from Turkey to get out of there -- because the Russians are arrogant fuckheads. The Turks then sat the watching those Russian jets and getting pissed off and got itchy for ANY excuse to shoot them down, so the second they flew over Turkish airspace shot them down. And it was only a second--the jets flew over a little strip of Turkey that juts out into Syria, they would only have been over it for seconds.
My guess is that the Turks fired while they were over Turkish territory but that they were over such a short time that they were back of Syria when the missiles hit.
Turkey isn't allowed to shoot down foreign military jets flying over its territory?sounds like premeditated murder to me.
Well, frankly I don't, I just want someone in charge that will keep the whackos in order. The one documented massacre blamed on the Assad regime (Hafez not Bashar) was the Hama Massacre, where Assad crushed an uprising by the Muslim Brotherhood. In hindsight, can you really blame him? The US killed FAR more people in Iraq then the Assads have killed. In the context of the civil war, stats and info about who killed whom is pretty unreliable. Even the number of people killed by the US in the Iraq war is a range of from 100K to 900K+ with the most credible number being around 300K. Most of the Syrians are fleeing chaos, not Assad. The older Assad far far more brutal then then son, yet there were not a great deal of refugees. Its the war, and people flee all wars, it has little to do with Assad.Assuming you don't give a flying fuck about Syrians. If you give a flying fuck about Syrians, then you would like for them to find some sort of regime that doesn't actively murder them, the way Assad/ISIS/Hezbollah do.
Because you don't give a FLYING FUCK about Syrians. You just want a guy in charge who keeps the place under control regardless of the cost in human life -- a zillion dead Syrians, who the fuck cares. Well some people do--but YOU clearly don't.Well, frankly I don't, I just want someone in charge that will keep the whackos in order.
They were soldiers following orders, and were out of the fight. Also valuable as prisoners. Now the Russians will demand revenge. The Turks have signed their death warrant.They said those "helpless men" were trying to bomb them before they became "helpless". Just saying, not trying to justify anything.
250K is the total Syrian estimated dead, Iraq war killed about 300K probably more. The sanctions against Iraq are estimated to have killed another 500K. So whos the butcher. And it was all done to keep them in check. Assad isn't launching wholesale assaults on the population, he is attacking people trying to overthrow him. civilian deaths are pretty much unavoidable. And for Assad it is fight or die. Some tribes in Syria have raised up against Assad, so what would you suggest as a correct course of action in that case? The US bombed infrastructure as well. Israel bombed oil tanks at Lebanons airport wiping out fish grounds even though the govt agreed to close the airport. Winning an insurgent war requires destruction of infrastructure. Look what the US did in Fallujah... Syria is one big Fallujah. The Vietnam boat people crisis was far worse then the Syrian refugees. More people are fleeing the collapse of the Assad regime, not the regime itself.Because you don't give a FLYING FUCK about Syrians. You just want a guy in charge who keeps the place under control regardless of the cost in human life -- a zillion dead Syrians, who the fuck cares. Well some people do--but YOU clearly don't.
And no that isn't he only documented massacre blamed on Assad, in the current civil war the guy has repeatedly used artillery and airstrikes on towns and cities that didn't support him, wholesale attacking the civilian population.
As for your BULLSHIT attempt to argue that the Iraq war was worse--BULLSHIT. There are already more dead civilians in Syria from the direct fighting, and there's no way to estimate the civilian losses from lack of access to healthcare and services--which is what your sources claim killed the most people in Iraq. The Syrian war is highly likely FAR WORSE. We just don't know yet, because nobody can go in and count the bodies without getting killed by Assad, Hezbollah, Isis, Putin, or some other fuckhead. The Americans botched the reconstruction in Iraq which resulted in poor delivery of services--Assad actually bombs the hospitals and destroys the infrastructure of places opposed to him: It isn't some accidental L Paul Bremmer fuckup. It's intentional wholesale assault on a civilian population.
Which is why it is now the world's largest refugee crisis. Bar none.
Russians have control of the air space over Syria. There's no reason for escort. Putin's "stab in the back" comment had double meaning. The other meaning being a F-16 popping up from the Turkish side and putting a missile up the pipe of his attack plane.I am very suprised that a bomber wasn't accompanied by Fighter Jets. Bomber is a sitting duck on its own. If a bomber was accompanied by the Jets two pilots would probably still be alive.
Yes, yes and German Capt. Wilm Hosenfeld saved Szpilman the Jew. While Szpilman's family, and millions of others, were turned into carbon emissions at Treblinka, Sobibor, Auschwitz, etc.Nonsense. I think your slip is showing.
I am reminded about the instance of German fighter pilot Franz Stigler who saved an American bomber crew desperately struggling for survival. Stigler had been dispatched to shoot down a straggler B17 and when he caught up to it, he could not believe what he saw. The B17 was virtually crippled and its crew fighting for their lives. By your account, he should have done his duty and shot it and the crew down. But when he saw that the plane was no longer a threat, he not only spared the crew, but guided it to the coast because the B17 was so badly wrecked, it had no guidance system left.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ane-let-fly-safely-instead-shooting-down.html
There's actually a photo I saw that showed a gathering of over 100 men women and children. They were all American, and none of them would be alive if Franz Stigler had simply shot that B17 down.
Actually I do care very much about Syrians. They were all far far better off under Assad then they would be under any of the current contenders for the throne.Assuming you don't give a flying fuck about Syrians. If you give a flying fuck about Syrians, then you would like for them to find some sort of regime that doesn't actively murder them, the way Assad/ISIS/Hezbollah do.
Before.Was that before or after the Commando Order?
It is a deep penetration strike fighter/fighter bomber very similar to the former USAF & RAAF F-111.It's fast for a bomber but still a sitting duck if you compare it to F16.
Another example of the artificial post World War I boundaries in the Middle East.The underlined bits are important. The Turkmen are seen as "related peoples" by the Turks and there are feelings of loyalty. I suspect that it was only a matter of time before Erdogan lashed out at Putin attacking Turkmen dissidents in Syria.
http://sputniknews.com/russia/20151125/1030742094/pilot-su24-rescued-no-turkish-space-violation.html"There were no warnings. Not via the radio, not visually. There was no contact whatsoever. That's why we were keeping our combat course as usual. You have to understand what the cruising speed of a bomber is compared to an F-16. If they wanted to warn us, they could have shown themselves by heading on a parallel course. But there was nothing. And the rocket hit our tail completely unexpectedly. We didn't even see it in time to take evasive maneuvres."