snow tires

Moraff

Active member
Nov 14, 2003
3,648
0
36
Interesting logic and values taking into consideration the massive depreciation hit you took on your 2008 car and when you drove your 2010 (already a model year old) off the lot.

We place more value on our "new" car than operating what we have. And we will always find ways to justify what we want.
Not sure I'm following you. From Car A to Car B I moved up to a better car, my monthly pmts went up $4.34, my insurance went DOWN by $250/yr and I didn't put a penny out of my pocket to do so. Other than not getting full value out of my tires what financial error did I make?
 

Moraff

Active member
Nov 14, 2003
3,648
0
36
You and Moraff may be very careful drivers, but there are 100s out there who are not. Then add kids, jaywalkers and seniors. I can't count the number of times I've had drivers blow red light, stop signs or pull out into traffic very badly and missed me by that much. Moraff's 25/75 thinking is flawed. Even at school zone speed with reaction time and mechanical stopping distance that an improvement of ~20 feet. At highway speeds it's ~75 feet.
You have valid points but at some point you have to decide what you wish to pay vs what you get in the way of an increased level of safety. Buying basic winter tires will give increased safety, but buying better quality winter tires will provide even more safety so shouldn't everyone be buying those? And in order to increase our safety in an accident shouldn't we be paying to install 5-point harnesses, wear helmets, HANS devices.......

Now I know it was mentioned that winter accidents dropped 18% after Quebec mandated winter tires, but how much of that was due to the milder winters we've had since then?

Isn't more likely that (as a general comment) people who buy winter tires drive more aggressively because they believe the superiority of the tires will allow them to do so? Kinda like the number of people who think that 4-wheel drive makes them stop quicker?

Sorry I'm rambling a bit... tired and heading to bed. Night all!
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,043
6,051
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Reality check alert! Reality check alert!! Woody is agreeing with Papa, the world must be waiting to end soon!!!!!!!
LOL!
That was equally shocking for me also....


"snow" tires are designed for more than simply snow. The rubber compound is different, so that even in the GTA with the lack of snow, the compound is going to give you better braking and handling. And it will give you better traction when there is slush/snow on the roads.

As for the money issue, it is really a nonissue. Having two sets of tires means that they wear at half the rate, extending the time between replacement. And you should be rotating tires very three months anyway, so this just ensures that you have rotated them at least twice of year, again extending the useful life of the tire.
Been there! Done that!
As stated earlier, for the several years living in the City of Buffalo where we were lucky to see a snowplow plow our street more than a couple times each winter, I used snows! 2 snow tires on the rear because all my vehicles were RWD back then. You needed snow tires for traction to drive through the unplowed snow. Then when moving out of Buffalo back to the burbs, haven't had any need for snows. The burbs know how to keep their roads clear.

Always rotated tires every 5000 miles back then and every 7500 miles now.
 

Hangman

The Ideal Terbite
Aug 6, 2003
5,596
1
0
www.fark.com
My car came with low-profile 'summer' tires. Can't even call them all-season. It also has ABS, traction control, AWD, and a bunch of other tricks. What's the point of having all that technology if you have no grip on the actual road??

I have a set of winter tires on separate rims. Anyone who thinks they don't need winter tires because 'they're a really good river' or 'they know their car' is fooling themselves. You should be a good driver and know your vehicle's handling characteristics anyway. Winter tires are specialized equipment for specific conditions. In conditions like London or Sarnia is experiencing, proper winter tires will help you a lot more than misplaced bravado about your skills as a driver. If you're not willing to use the proper equipment, then stay the hell away from me. You're the guy I see sliding helplessly into an intersection when you can stop on the frozen slush and ice under your slick and cold-hardened 'all-seasons.'
 

Hangman

The Ideal Terbite
Aug 6, 2003
5,596
1
0
www.fark.com

shakenbake

Senior Turgid Member
Nov 13, 2003
7,807
1,920
113
Durham Region, Den of Iniquity
www.vafanculo.it
Some things never change. You still don't need them in the gta. Good all seasons are fine. Don't listen to the chumps who believe the hype and now have a second set to store.
That is your opinion. I used to think that it was all hype, too. But, I noticed on both my vehicles the much better control with winter tires in the cold. All seasons are a compormise with respect to winter driving, and I had among the best 'all seasons' on the market at the time.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
You have valid points but at some point you have to decide what you wish to pay vs what you get in the way of an increased level of safety. Buying basic winter tires will give increased safety, but buying better quality winter tires will provide even more safety so shouldn't everyone be buying those? And in order to increase our safety in an accident shouldn't we be paying to install 5-point harnesses, wear helmets, HANS devices.......

Now I know it was mentioned that winter accidents dropped 18% after Quebec mandated winter tires, but how much of that was due to the milder winters we've had since then?

Isn't more likely that (as a general comment) people who buy winter tires drive more aggressively because they believe the superiority of the tires will allow them to do so? Kinda like the number of people who think that 4-wheel drive makes them stop quicker?

Sorry I'm rambling a bit... tired and heading to bed. Night all!
You can wear a 5 point harness or helmet if you want and that will probably protect you, but what about the other guy you might hit. If you think the winter was milder last year in Montreal than the year before, you don't have friends, family or business there. The worst condition for driving is when the temperatures straddles 0C like it does a lot in TO. That's when you get ice and slush. When it's really cold, the snow is crisp and dry and there is little black ice and no slush.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
From the website "The tyre is the perfect alternative for motorists who want to drive all year round in a moderate climate on one type of tyre."

I don't think Canada qualifies as "moderate", especially to a Dutch company. They don't really have a winter there.
What I see in this tire is that you have less tread/tire for each condition so again it's a compromise. Do you think that 3 inches of winter tread does the job of 6 inches of winter tread; no way. When buying winter tires you have to decide if you going to deal with more ice or snow. Some winter tires handle ice better than snow, some do it better the other way around.
 
Dec 12, 2008
319
0
0
Because you are gonna go through a set of tires anyway... so if you run snows 5 months a year the other tires will last longer.
No they won't. Tires need to be replaced every five or six years regardless of how few km's may be on them. The rubber will still harden and dry out compromising traction.
 

Old Milwaukee

New member
Aug 8, 2009
362
0
0
Not sure I'm following you. From Car A to Car B I moved up to a better car, my monthly pmts went up $4.34, my insurance went DOWN by $250/yr and I didn't put a penny out of my pocket to do so. Other than not getting full value out of my tires what financial error did I make?
Why would the dealer do this if there were not some financial benefit for them? Trust me, they profited in some way, at your expense.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
No they won't. Tires need to be replaced every five or six years regardless of how few km's may be on them. The rubber will still harden and dry out compromising traction.
Most car wear out or get traded in in 5 or six years, so no big deal. The idea is to use the tires you have. If they're sitting around for four or five years, what's the use? I've been doing this for over 30 years and the longest I've owned a single car was for 10 years, with 350,000 km, and went through two set of each in that time. I sold the car with the snows and the owner was very happy he didn't have to jump out and buy a set of snows for the first year as they still had good tread and no cracks inside or out. Using Nitrogen to fill the tires also helps extend the life.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
Most car wear out or get traded in in 5 or six years, so no big deal. The idea is to use the tires you have. If they're sitting around for four or five years, what's the use? I've been doing this for over 30 years and the longest I've owned a single car was for 10 years, with 350,000 km, and went through two set of each in that time. I sold the car with the snows and the owner was very happy he didn't have to jump out and buy a set of snows for the first year as they still had good tread and no cracks inside or out. Using Nitrogen to fill the tires also helps extend the life.

Problem with using N2 is if the tire goes low you do not have the ability to use your compressor to fill it. Until you can hit a gas station, anywhere, and fill the tire, it is impractical.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
Your tires last 5 years? Mine last, even with using snows, 3 years, occasionally 4.
I'm guessing yours are high performance with a tread rating of 160 or less. I'm not sure if snow have such ratings but all season are speed and distant rated.
 
B

burt-oh-my!

Burt everything you've brought has been discussed in this thread and put in perspective.

Yes, the winter tires wear a little quicker, they're softer, but you've only got them on for Nov to April, 5 months at most. If they're wearing too fast you might be keeping them on too long. I didn't put mine on this year until two weeks ago when the temperature reached 7C in the day time. They probably wear too unevenly for your tastes because you don't balance/rotate your tires periodically.

The tire rotations have to be done anyways, so putting the winter on then taking them off are just the same as rotation, no extra cost.

There are very few vehicles that can have steel wheels and you're forced to buy mags. I don't drive one, so it doesn't bother, but if you are then you can afford another set because they're expensive cars. A set of steel wheels should cost around $200, I paid $120, and if you think $200 is too much to spend every few years then you really cheap. Save some money and buy another car that takes the same wheel or sell them to someone.

Your safety factor comment is just stupid. If you want to die, feel free. The worse thing to happen is that someone else is killed. Your driving habits may be ok, but you can't count on other drivers.

Did you read the thread at all or just the first and last part?
Hey didckwad, my safety comment is completely rational. Safety like anything else has a price, both in terms of dollars and inconvenience. And, being safe is a probabilistic thing: you can take a dangerous action and have nothing happen to you, and you can take very safe actions, and still get hurt. My point is that just because something increases you rsafety, it is NOT obvious that you need to do it. you have to look at the trade-offs. Otherwise, as I said, you could most assuredly save a ton of lives by wearing helmets in cars.

If you want to die by not wearing a helmet in a car, feel free.

Of bloody wel course not everyone does normal tire rotations, idiot. The majority of people DO NOT rotate their tires, so yes, changing tires can increase costs that way. OBVIOUSLY.

They wear out faster, dummy, BECAUSE THEY HAVE A SHORTER RATED LIFE.

YOU obviously didnt read MY post - I have snow tires, so I amOBVIOUSLY not cheap. Please pay at least a little attention. I was saying that I dont get my panties in a knot when someone else makes a decision not to do something that improves their safety.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
Problem with using N2 is if the tire goes low you do not have the ability to use your compressor to fill it. Until you can hit a gas station, anywhere, and fill the tire, it is impractical.
I've seldom had to top off a N2 tire, maybe once in 3 years. Maybe the tires are topped off by the shop when the tires are changed over. There's no real problems if you 'have' to top off with air. The one time I've had a tire repaired and filled with air, I'll just ask my tire guys to purge and refill with N2. The only time they've ever charged me was the first time, $5.00 per tire, since then nadda. Oddly enough, my car dealer has decided to not get N2 gear in their new place, but I don't go to them for tire care anyway. They did have to replace a damage tire 'free' and because they filled it with air I went to my tire guys for the winter change over and they said they'd replaced it free next season.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
I have snows, but I can assure they most certainly DO cost you more money. They wear out at LEAST twice as fast, And my experience is that they wear out quite more 'unevenly' than regular tires do. the cost of changing over twice a year is an extra, or, if you have dedicated rims, the cost of those rims.

I don't think they are a necessity. I have them, I like them, but they aren't necessary. Just better.

Why is it that some people seem to think that just because something is safer it is therefore dumb not to have it? You want safety, wear a helmet in the car - guarantee you that that will save a lot of lives.

How a person drives is far far more important than having snows.
Hey didckwad, my safety comment is completely rational. Safety like anything else has a price, both in terms of dollars and inconvenience. And, being safe is a probabilistic thing: you can take a dangerous action and have nothing happen to you, and you can take very safe actions, and still get hurt. My point is that just because something increases you rsafety, it is NOT obvious that you need to do it. you have to look at the trade-offs. Otherwise, as I said, you could most assuredly save a ton of lives by wearing helmets in cars.

If you want to die by not wearing a helmet in a car, feel free.

Of bloody wel course not everyone does normal tire rotations, idiot(s). The majority of people DO NOT rotate their tires, so yes, changing tires can increase costs that way. OBVIOUSLY.

They wear out faster, dummy, BECAUSE THEY HAVE A SHORTER RATED LIFE.

YOU obviously didnt read MY post - I have snow tires, so I amOBVIOUSLY not cheap. Please pay at least a little attention. I was saying that I dont get my panties in a knot when someone else makes a decision not to do something that improves their safety.

Hey NUMBNUTTS!

Your whole first paragraph in your first post is total nonsense. Nuff said on that.

How do you know that most people don't rotate their tires? Do you go around asking everyone? If they don't, they won't get proper life from them and are wasting money; feel free. If they don't, they're idiots.

Tires wear out for all types of other reasons as well, under or over inflation, bad cornering, hard breaking, or jack rabbit starts, regardless of the rating of a tire. I've an amazing number of people driving their betters with snows on all year around; really dumb.


I did read your post and ya, you have snow tires, but you've decided they're not worth it as you whine about the costs in cash and your valuable time of rotating/changing, and buying the specialty tires, because the snows wear faster, certainly not twice as fast in my experience, and the extra wheels(steel wheels). You are counting/pinching pennies. All sort of posts in this thread and previous threads have shown the extra costs aren't that out of line and less than some think, especially when you measure them against the safety factors they give you,
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
Nitrogen tire fills?

Sucker!


Would you like to buy a glass of filtered water with your meal sir? $2
Ok, N2 filled tires don't leak as much through the rubber as O2 filled tires because the N2 molecule is larger. The N2 won't react with the rubber the same way, if at all, as O2 does causing weakness in the rubber on the inside. The cost is $20.00 once in the life of my set of tires which cost an average of $600.00. How many bottle of water do some people buy in 4 years. Don't worry, i don't buy much bottled water at all.

Then for those who don't have air compressors around their house or in the car, the gas stations are charging for top ups now.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
Ok, N2 filled tires don't leak as much through the rubber as O2 filled tires because the N2 molecule is larger. The N2 won't react with the rubber the same way, if at all, as O2 does causing weakness in the rubber on the inside. The cost is $20.00 once in the life of my set of tires which cost an average of $600.00. How many bottle of water do some people buy in 4 years. Don't worry, i don't buy much bottled water at all.

Then for those who don't have air compressors around their house or in the car, the gas stations are charging for top ups now.


Another advantage to N2 is you are not using compressed air. Unless an air dryer is used you add water to the compressed air.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts