Will there ever be another Mo Cheeks??? I hated the Sixers of that day, but loved MO's attitude and heart....MLAM said:..because you go from having two post up threats (CV and Bosh) and an outside shooter / scorer to punish teams that double team them (James), to only ONE consistent scorer (Bosh) and no one to take the double pressure off of him (because Ford can't shoot).
If you think the 7-0 225 lbs, never seen a weight machine, 11 pts / game with no boards in the Italian league Bargnani is going to give you (this year) the 14 - 16 points / 6 - 8 reb you could have reasonably expected out of CV, you are dreaming.
If you make this trade because you think TJ Ford is the next Mo Cheeks, a pure point guard without big points and assist numbers - ok. But if you beleive that - why didn't the Bucks? Why couldn't TJ keep the other Buck point guards on the bench? And BTW - Cheeks could shoot - he was one of the most effiecnt shooting point guards in league history - he just didn't shoot much. TJ Ford can't shoot.
I understand that perhaps BC thought his chemistry was wrong with James at PG...ok, whatever. To me, you then DRAFT a "pure point", you don't give up proven talent to get one, unless you get PROVEN TALENT in return. TJ Ford has not proved he is top 25% NBA point guard yet...not even top 50%.
My analysis is that this trade makes the team worse - you've given up a proven scorer (CV) and put another one in limbo (James) for a guy who can't score (Ford). And BTW - who the fuck is he going to be doing all this passing too now?? A double and triple teamed Bosh?
Its a return to 2004, with Bosh as the only guy who can put the ball in the hole..
Damn, I just agreed with MALM... worse yet... I have to agree with the rest of your analysis above.... I cannot understand why they would not have drafted a PG.... the only thing that I can think of is that BC could not get a good deal for the #1 choice
But Mike James was not much of a point guard!!!!! More of a shooting Guard..