Yes, an imperialist 19th century mindset about "spheres of influence".
We agree.
Trump/Zelensky deal turns into Jerry Springer episode
- Thread starter nottyboi
- Start date
We agree.
Really? Name ONE. Or is it something you know about “everyone in the world”?
If the US was trying to invade Mexico, yes, it would be justified.
The threat of WW3 is what is needed to keep Russia contained.
Mutually assured destruction.
The other alternative is for Ukraine to acquire nukes.
The US and China also have spheres of influence of their own.
Canada is part of America's sphere of influence, whether you like it or not
There is not a snowball's chance in hell the West will ever give Ukraine nukes
They dont have to.
Ukraine can develop their own if they want to.
They have the capability.
On the flip side, what should Canada and Mexico do now that the US has joined a Russian military alliance?
With the US threatening Mexico and calling Canada the 51st state it seems like we need to call on NATO.
Last edited:
Yes really. From reading your idiotic posts I would bet good money you believe it’s a real photo, and yes you are also one of the delusional arrogant indigents on Terb that think they know everything about everybody in the world.
And you think CHat GTP is impartial? Where you do you think it loads it data? who do you think creates its alogos? AI is like a child, if a racist parent raises a child, what will their biases likely be? The war actually started in Kiev.
Provide sources to back up your history then.
Let me point out some obvious distinctions.
The USA has been in Europe since WW2. Russia and China do not have a presence in Mexico.
Europe is an ally of the USA - at least up to this week - and is intimately concerned about Russian aggression - espec Poland, the Baltics and Scandinavia. As the US is Europe's ally, it's legitimately concerned as well.
The US hasn't attacked Mexico since 1917 or denied Mexico's right to exist. Russia has done both re Ukraine.
your posts get dumber all the time.
The threat of WW3 is what is needed to stop Russia.
And obligations from the Russian hands that fed him since the 1980’s when Russia started to cultivate him. After which he (ha ha!) paid $100,000 for a full page anti-NATO ad in theNY Times
Yes not until Ukraine sees no way out of this and withdraws from the NPT.
Long shot but they could if they needed to and are pushed to it.
Canada a mexico should create a free trade agreement that us separate form the MCUSA, but logistics might be difficult with the USA.
Schlong, it wasn't even close to a scientific poll. It was open voting on a liberal commentator's website.
It's kind of bizarre to see it on CNN, but I guess this guy has his own weekend show.
I'm more interested in legitimate polling that tells us if the Oval Office meeting moved the needle on support for the war one way or another. My guess it won't change public sentiment in the U.S.
Last edited:
It is not going to happen unless Europe wants to be annihilated, and probably everybody else except maybe New Zealand.
One o f Russia's requirements for an end to the war is a demilitarized Ukraine.
I think Trump wants to be the Putin of the Western Hemisphere and would invade Canada and Greenland in a second, if he thought the backlash wouldn't be too great.
I think he would also invade Mexico and enslave the Mexicans and force them to work in concentration camps and produce golf carts and male makekup products at a very low cost for him and his friends.
